Tuesday 11 October 2011


       
Table of Contents

1.      The Catholic Church & The New World Order
2.      Is Celibacy To Blame? (For Child Sexual Abuse)
3.      Freemasonry Unveiled
4.      Who Can Find Fault With Democracy
5.      St. Francis DeSales: On A True Church Council
6.      “The Danger Of Sensationalism”
7.      How To Be A Catholic
8.      Jesus Christ Instituted The Holy Eucharist
9.      The Catholic Church and Antisemitism
10. The Papal Condemnations of Freemasonry
11. History
12. Where Terrorism Began
13. Where America Got Uncle Sam
14. The Story Of Blessed Oliver Plunkett
15. Death & Taxes
16. Where Everyone Mattered And Had A Home
17. The Truth About The Spanish Civil War
18. The Three Days Darkness (the impending Divine chastisement)


 The Catholic Church & The New World Order 
                                                                     By: Elaine Murray

Introduction

Until halfway into the 20th century, the order of the Western world was Christian. Not like the industrial revolution in England, which is the image most people have of the old world order. That was a phenomenon of the 18th century.  The Christian order was mostly rural in character, and those who were not farmers were mostly trades people or small to medium sized business people living in towns or cities, and government did little more than conduct the law of the land to keep everything in order. The whole scheme of things was modeled on Christian principles, due to the influence of the Catholic Church. The Christian character of even Protestant countries had the Catholic Church for its foundation, because all the Protestant countries were first Catholic countries. Even England was a great Catholic nation for 900 years before King Henry VIII broke away from the Church to establish his own version of Christianity. After Henry VIII broke away from the Church and inaugurated a great bloodbath to enforce his own religion, it became necessary to coin the word “pauper,” because Catholic England was so prosperous and well looked after by the Monasteries, that poverty was almost non-existent, as crime was almost non-existent. This state of things was possible due to the work of the monasteries, which were huge landed proprietors. Monasteries were peopled by monks who had vows of poverty, chastity and obedience. The vow of poverty meant that the monks were only allowed to retain of what was so generously bestowed on them by the wealthy and middle class, what was barely necessary to the support of life. The rest they gave away to the poor. The land they owned was rented to the poor at rents so low that they were merely token. If the land yielded the poor farmer a good yield that year, they paid the rent. If there was little or no yield, the poor farmer paid little or no rent. His tenure was of the most secure kind, because the monks were easy landlords permanently established. Their land did not pass on to an erring or greedy heir. The poor knew that they could turn to the monastery in their need. They, and weary travelers, never knocked on the monastery doors in vain. The monks were usually farmers themselves and had income from their own work too. The monasteries were great centers of learning. Many of the universities of today originated with Catholic monasteries. The monasteries also originated hospitals. It was thus that the nations became Catholic. St. Augustine went to England, and sought the approval of King Alfred to establish the monks and to preach the Catholic faith and found benevolent institutions, and soon the King and the people became Catholic. There was no bloody imposition of the true original form of Christianity by the sword. But it was all swept away by the imposition of man-made Protestantism by fire and sword. The same happened in other countries where Protestantism got a foothold.

Protestantism didn’t come out of the woodwork. A single adulterer could not have devised such a system and imposed it in an enduring fashion. Protestantism would have died when Henry VIII died, if it was his invention. Similarly, if Martin Luther was acting alone, he would have been dismissed as a nutcase or a buffoon, especially since his teachings were ridiculous and contrary to Sacred Scripture. No, Protestantism was enforced by the large network of Jews and secret societies which had become very powerful in some parts of Europe at the time. Protestantism was a product of the age old Jewish conspiracy against the Church. It was a religion to destroy religion;  a wedge to divide, and to eventually conquer the Christian West. That is why figureheads of this system such as Henry VIII, Martin Luther, and Calvin, etc., began cropping up in many places simultaneously – all disagreeing with one another in the particulars of Protestantism, but all agreeing with one another in their opposition to the Church of Rome, the true original Christianity at that time. The Protestants asserted that their revolt was really a call for the Church to reform certain real abuses that had crept into the Church then. Such abuses as simony, that is, the buying and selling of bishoprics and indulgences (an indulgence is time off purgatory if one does specific good works such as to recite certain prayers or attend Mass for the purpose. It can be applied to the living or the dead). However, the sincerity of the Protestants pretext of reform was shown in their intransigence and pertinacity in the face of the reforms the Catholic Church enacted at the Council of Trent to correct the abuses they used as a pretext for their dissention. Protestantism jettisoned whole books of the Bible, and mutilated the faith revealed by God. It is a revolt from the true biblical faith of the Catholic Church founded by God Himself, Jesus Christ, and guaranteed with His promises.

When the world was still under the sway of Christianity, the Blessed Virgin Mary appeared to three poor little shepherd children and told them that God was going to punish the world for sin, and that Russia was the instrument that God had chosen for the purpose. This occurred in Fatima, Portugal, in October 1917. At the other end of Europe, in the same month, the Russian revolution began, bringing Atheistic Communism to power, in one of the greatest bloodbaths the world has ever seen. 60,000,000 people, mostly Christians, lost their lives to establish the most miserable tyranny the world has ever known. Even the reign of Hitler was mild in comparison with the Russian revolution. One only hears of the tyranny of Hitler because the media and modern governments are under Jewish control, but one never hears of the horrors of the Russian revolution and its ensuing government. The Blessed Virgin said that “Russia would spread her errors, raising up wars and persecutions of the Church” and that “the good would be martyred.” She also gave a prophecy about the future of the Church called the famous “third secret of Fatima,” which there will be more about further on.
Over the next several decades, Communist Russia invaded Eastern Europe, China and several other East Asian countries imposing its errors. It did likewise in many African countries. In 1989, the Berlin wall came down, because the West had become so Atheized that there was no longer anything to keep out of Russia. Before that, Russia was like one big concentration camp.

Nevertheless, the government of Russia does not seem to be the cause of the Atheization of America the West, and besides, the old Communist regime of Russia is gone, and Russia seems to be becoming more of a democratic state where people can now protest against the president without being liquidated, as they were under the Communist regime. The answer to that resides in what Our Lady meant by “Russia”.

So what is the significance of Our Lady’s words about “Russia?” Firstly, it ought to be remarked that the leadership of the Communist revolution and the ensuing dictatorship was Jewish. The Communist revolution and its government was bankrolled by Jewish financiers on Wall St., New York.
It is evident that the majority of Jews are white people, who look more like Europeans than like the Hebrews of the Old Testament, who were brown people. The latter were not unlike the Arabs, who are also Semites, being descendants of Abraham. That is because the white Jews, called Ashkenazi’s, who constitute the majority of the International Synagogue, are descendants of a Southern Russian tribe called the Kazars, who converted to the Synagogue at the end of the first millennia. The worldwide Synagogue is under the control of these Ashkenazi’s. The Jews known as Sephardim, who are brown people, are the descendants of the Hebrews. These latter are racially Semites. However, neither the Sephardim nor the majority Ashkenazi’s are religiously Semites because they follow the Talmud and the Kaballah as their chief religious code, and the Torah (which is the Old Testament of the Bible) has been almost rewritten by them to adapt it to the political aspirations of the Synagogue. That makes it invalid before God. That is why Heaven regards the A.D. Synagogue as “Russia”, and not as Jews. The Jews before God were the people of the religion of the Old Testament. What Jews were in the Old Testament, Catholics are in the New Testament. However, I will continue to refer to these Ashkenazi’s as Jews so that I can make myself understood. The bankers on Wall St. are mostly Ashkenazi’s. So are the Jews who control the American Government through the agency of international Freemasonry. Thus, “Russia,” the Ashkenazi Jews, through the agency of Freemasonry, runs the New World Order. The New World Order is what is meant by the words “Russia would spread her errors.” This is also what is behind the many court cases and campaigns in recent history to drive prayer, Christmas with Christ, and Christianity out of the public weal, and why anything, no matter how untrue or insulting, can be said against Christianity, while on the other hand, even valid criticism of Jews is silenced by branding it “anti-Semitism: and by outlawing it as hate speech.

So where does that leave the Catholic Church “the Church of the living God, the pillar and ground of truth” (1 Tim. 3: 15),  if it is supposed to be against “the errors of Russia?” The institution of  the Catholic Church has been taken over by the New World Order, scaled down, and converted to its purposes. “For such false apostles are deceitful workmen, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no wonder: for Satan himself transforms himself into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers be transformed as the ministers of justice, whose end shall be according to their works.” (2 Corinthians 11: 13-15). This was achieved primarily by means of the child sex abuse scandals and by Vatican II.
There have been a number of what the Church terms as false Church Councils throughout history. Vatican II took place in the 1960s, but its results, such as introducing doctrines previously condemned by infallible authority, suppressing Catholic doctrines enumerated ahead, changing certainly valid sacramental forms for ones of disputable validity, and giving license to all forms of irreverence and even blasphemy, shows that it was, in reality, more of a Masonic congress to destroy Catholicism, and so, it is likely to be ranked among the false Councils of  Church history. It was not the institution of the Church that the enemies of Jesus Christ wanted to destroy, because they could take control of it, and turn it to their purposes. It was the faith of the Church they took aim at, because that’s what Christianity is: “Only those are to be considered members of the Church who profess the true faith and are baptized,” (Mystici Corporis, 22, by Pope Pius XII). “We should believe not otherwise than has been handed down by the tradition of the Church of God. Irenaeus too says: ‘The doctrine of the Apostles is the true faith.” (Satis Cognitum, 32, by Pope Leo XIII). Thus, the “errors of Russia” spread even into the Church up to its highest levels, as the famous third secret of Fatima predicted.
The child sex abuse scandals took care of destroying the well earned prestige the Church had, and of lessening its influence and attraction. It also provided a convenient smokescreen behind which to close down and sell off Church property and institutions. Sex as a weapon of war and hatred. They achieved this by flooding the priesthood and Catholic institutions with homosexuals and Freemasons, when they got control of the Church. By the 1950s they had such control, even in Rome, that a good Catholic boy could not get into the priesthood in many places.

Freemasonry was condemned directly or indirectly by all the Popes that have sat upon the chair of Peter since it was condemned in 1738 by Pope Clement XII. Freemasonry was originally a Catholic institution. It was the guild of stone masons that built the great basilicas and cathedrals from the middle ages. But it was taken over by the secret societies and formally constituted as an esoteric institution against the Church in 1717. Pope Leo XII called it “the kingdom of Satan” in his encyclical Humanum Genus or On Freemasonry in 1884. Pope Pius IX called it “the Synagogue of Satan.” Pope Leo XIII, in his letter to the Italian people in 1892, said that to be allied with Freemasonry was apostasy and treason: “Let us remember that Christianism and Freemasonry are essentially incompatible, to such an extent, that to become united with one means being divorced from the other. Let us, therefore, expose Freemasonry as the enemy of God, of the Church and of our Motherland.” “The more things change, the more they stay the same!” 

How can we be sure that Vatican II is what I said it is? We can be sure that Vatican II was Masonic and not Catholic, because of its fruits. “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. By their fruits you shall know them… Even so, every good tree brings forth good fruit, and the evil tree brings forth evil fruit.” (Matthew 7: 15-17). Vatican II taught what the infallible authority of the Church had previously condemned, and it suppressed crucial Catholic doctrines, and imposed Masonic doctrine. Liberty, Fraternity and Equality are the euphemisms Freemasonry has deceived the world with since the French revolution. At Vatican II, the new Masonic establishment of the Church introduced the new, unbiblical, man made, and previously condemned doctrines of Religious Liberty, Ecumenism and Collegiality, which are the Masonic doctrines of Liberty, Fraternity and Equality in Church-speak. Vatican II did what Freemasons have always done when they got power in Catholic states: monasteries and convents were shut down, and monks, nuns and priests who had nothing to do with the child sex abuse scandals were turned out on the streets. Catholic hospitals and other charities were shut down and given over to the state, even though the Catholic hospitals were as good, or better than the secular hospitals. Since Vatican II, hardly any Catholic schools remain, and the ones that do, shelved their Catholic curriculum and adopted the state curriculum, even though the Catholic curriculum was vastly superior to the state curriculums, which produce a lot of semi-literates and delinquents. Before Vatican II, boys Catholic schools were taught by priests or religious brothers, and girls schools were taught by nuns. Co-ed. was condemned by Pope Pius XI in his encyclical on Catholic education Divini Illius Magistri. It is consistent for the post-Vatican II church to do everything the opposite of the true Catholic Church. Almost all post-Vatican II “Catholic” schools are co-ed. and they are taught by unCatholic if not anti-Catholic lay teachers. Before Vatican II, Catholic education was so distinctive that Catholics were forbidden to send their children to godless state schools, or to Protestant schools. There were plenty of schools and Catholic universities to meet this need. Now most Catholic children go to public schools, and the public schools are less of a danger to the faith of the children than are the so-called Catholic schools of the average diocese or archdiocese. After Vatican II Catholic countries were deCatholicized by the Vatican directing their respective governments to drop the clauses in their nations constitutions making Catholicism the religion of the state. Only an enemy would reverse the success of the reign of God in the world. Vatican II also changed all the sacraments instituted by Jesus Christ, so that almost all of them are now invalid, with the possible exceptions of baptism and marriage. That particularly means that the invalid new rite of ordination and episcopal consecration have not produced valid priests or bishops since 1968.

Why is changing the teachings of the Church such a big deal? The reason that it is such a big deal is because the Catholic Faith is not man-made. The Catholic faith was given to man by God Himself, as a condition of salvation from Hell after death, and as a condition of being Gods people. The faith revealed by God is the truth, and the law of God, which is what is good and right, is what the Church founded by Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of God, consists of. The See of Peter was established by Christ as the guardian of the truth, and the law of God. That is the covenant of God. The truth about God and about life and death are eternal and immutable. To depart from the truth is to venture into lies. The high priest in the Old Testament (the same thing as the Pope in the New Testament) used to wear the words “urim” and “thummim” on the “Rational of Judgment” which he wore when he passed judgment on important matters in the name of God. The words “urim” and “thummim” means “truth” and “justice,” which has always been the basis of the Covenant of God. That is why: “Not every sin, however grave it may be, is such as of its own nature to sever a man from the Body of the Church, as does schism or heresy or apostasy.” (Mystici Corporis, 23, by Pope Pius XII). That even applies to the Pope, so that even a Pope who becomes a heretic gets severed from the Church and automatically loses his office. See examples of Church teaching further on that demonstrates this. Similarly, a Council that errs in matters of faith and morals is a false Council. A Pope who is a sinner is still a Pope, but as the quote from Pope Pius XII said, heresy is a different matter. Heresy consists not only of positive teachings contrary to the divinely revealed truths of Catholicism, such as Ecumenism, Religious Liberty and Collegiality are, it also involves suppressing Catholic doctrines. St Thomas Aquinas, Doctor of the Church, defines a heretic as: “one who follows new or false opinions.” (Summa Theologica, Vol. 3, Q. 11, Of Heresy, Art.1). (The reason for this is because the Catholic faith is based on Divine revelation which is complete and perfect). St. Thomas also said: “whoever is a heretic, is also a schismatic.” (Ibid. Q. 39, Of Schism, Art. 1).

“Whosever revolts, and continues not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God.” (2 Jn. 1: 9).

When the Masonic infiltrators got control of the Church, behind the guise of their new authority, they suppressed the dogma of the faith by the promulgation of a new liturgy. This new liturgy was imposed on the Church in 1968. The average man in the pew knows little or nothing of the faith apart from the basic elements contained in the Creed. Those over 60 may have received some catechism in elementary or high school, but those who grew up after the 1950s only had the inane Jesus loves you texts that teach nothing. What they see and hear at Mass, is all they know of the Catholic faith, and even in that they are full of erroneous ideas, such as notions of “obedience” and “charity” that are Masonic, and not Catholic. Therefore, the changes and deletions of doctrines from the liturgy reflect the changes of the faith of the institution. Doctrines deleted from the new liturgy approved by Paul VI include: detachment from the world, the devil, the flesh and the world as the three enemies of the soul, miracles, the merits of the saints, that the Church has enemies, that the Catholic Church is the one true Church outside of which there is no salvation. The Vatican II establishment began to teach instead that everyone goes to Heaven and that all religions are a means of salvation! The latter may sound very nice and broadminded, but it is not true! “Enter ye in at the narrow gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and many there are who go in thereat. How narrow is the gate, and strait is the way that leads to life: and few there are that find it.” (Matthew 7: 13,14). People need to know the truth about the requirements for getting to Heaven, so that they can have a chance to go there! They took away “I am the Immaculate Conception” from the shrine of Lourdes where the Blessed Virgin appeared and identified herself with those words. They obviously don’t want to remind people that the mother of Jesus Christ was the only human being besides Jesus Christ who was conceived without original sin, and never had the least shadow of sin in her life. Also, one seldom, if ever, hears of such dogmas from the sermons, now called “homilies” of Vatican II priests. Gone also is the concept of sin, especially sin as the only evil to be feared. Gone also is “the fear of God,” and the concept of man’s utter nothingness and unworthiness before the awesome and incomprehensible majesty and infinitely perfect holiness of God. Gone out of the modern liturgy are supplications such as “we beseech Thee,” which have been replaced by the more insolent “pray Lord...” Gone are references to fasting and penance, and to sin as gravely offending God, and the fear of Gods fury inflicting the blows of His wrath on the sinner. Gone also, are references to prayers for the departed and purgatory. Gone is “negative theology.” “For it is a people that provokes to wrath, and lying children, children that will not hear the law of God. Who say to the seers: See not: and to them that behold: Behold not for us the things that are right: speak unto us pleasant things, see errors for us. Take away from me the way, turn away the path from me, let the Holy One of Israel cease from before us.” (Isaias 30: 9-11). Positivism is a Masonic concept. In truth, however, what is positive is not always good, and what is negative is not always bad. Goodness and truth consists of both positive and negative.
In 1968 Cardinal Ottaviani, the prefect for the Holy Office, the second highest position in the Church next to the Pope, along with a number of other Cardinals, sent an intervention to Paul VI objecting to the new liturgy. He said that the new Mass “represents, both as a whole and in its details, a striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Mass... The innovations of the Novus Ordo (New Order of Mass) and the fact that all that is of perennial value finds only a minor place – if it subsists at all – could well turn into a certainty the suspicion, already prevalent, alas, in many circles, that truths which have always been believed by the Christian people can be changed or ignored without infidelity to that sacred deposit of doctrine to which the Catholic faith is bound forever,” (Cover letter to Paul VI of the Intervention). It is true, alas, that Cardinal Ottaviani later retracted his “intervention.” However such a retraction was invalid because it was a lie made out of fear resulting from underhanded pressure or threats – plenty of that goes on in the Church under the new infiltrated Masonic establishment. Not because there was anything untrue in the document or in the cover letter. The truth of the document is unassailable and speaks for itself. The “retraction” of something obviously true betrays foul play and only reinforces it.

Vatican II was touted as a Council intended to teach the Catholic faith in a new way, and to make the Church more relevant to modern man – at least, that was the plausible pretext! However, people left the Church in droves, and there were hardly any new converts. Indeed, after Vatican II, the Church authorities began to reject the notion of converting people from unbelief and false religion to the Church. They literally began to tell potential converts to stay in their perdition. Only an enemy of God and a servant of the Devil would do such a thing!
It is for man to conform to God, not for God to conform to man: “be not conformed to this world.” (Romans 12: 2). “We know that we are of God, and the whole world is seated in wickedness.” (1 John 5: 19). There is no new way of preaching the Gospel other than how the Church has preached it for 2,000 years. The effeminate newspeak, equivocation and outright falsehood typical of Vatican II and its establishment, does not build up holy doctrine, it tears it down! Holy doctrine is recognized by its truth, clarity and precision of expression, as found in the texts produced by the true Popes and true Councils and in the writings of the saints until 1958. The unequivocal and undiluted truth works in every age! Modern man is sick of politicians and talking heads who tell them what they want to hear, water down the issues, falsify and equivocate. That is what has to be done to be popular, but it doesn’t save souls or make the world a better place. The purpose of the Church is not to be popular, but to save souls from eternal Hellfire and to make the world a better place, according to Gods plan. Jesus Christ told His Apostles to be prepared for the fact that their God given mission of truth and right would often make them unpopular: “If the world hate you, know ye, that it hated Me before you. If you had been of the world, the world would love you as its own: but because you are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hates you. Remember My word that I said to you: The servant is not greater than his master. If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you: if they have kept my word, they will keep yours also.” (John 15: 18-20). The disastrous results of Vatican II speak for themselves. It would not be possible for even the Antichrist to produce fruits more evil, if he got control of the Church!

None of this would be possible unless the enemies of Jesus Christ got a Pope who was under their control and one of them. A Pope under their control who is their servant and not Jesus Christ’s, is an Antipope. To be their servant, not Jesus Christ’s, would constitute apostasy, which the quote above from Pope Pius XII already shows, severs from the Church. It may not be possible to prove that an apparent Pope is an apostate unless he does something outwardly that proves that he is. Favoring the Masonic agenda would be one proof. Approving and professing heresy would be another proof. If he professes what the Church has previously condemned and consistently contradicts Sacred Scripture, on which the Catholic faith is founded, then he can certainly be regarded as a heretic and severed from the Church. He cannot be the head of what he is not part of, teaches St. Robert Bellarmine, Doctor of the Church. This is the teaching of the Church. All of the Popes since John XXIII was elected in 1958 favored the Masonic agenda in the Church and in the world, and taught heresy, that is, what previous popes had condemned and what contradicts Sacred Scripture. For example, Sacred Scripture teaches and the Church has always taught that the Old Covenant was voided and that the Jews were responsible for the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, but the Popes of Vatican II and the Vatican II Church now contradicts this.

How could God allow such a thing to happen? Did He not promise that “the gates of Hell will not prevail” (Matt. 16: 18) against His Church?
A series of antipopes, and the events surrounding Vatican II, do not mean that the gates of Hell have prevailed against the Church. The true Popes of undisputable authority before Vatican II knew well about the promises of God to His Church when they confirmed that the apparition and prophecies of Our Lady of La Salette in 1846 which said that “Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of Antichrist,” were of Heavenly and divine origin. The apparition of Our Lady of Fatima was similarly approved. The real third secret of Fatima predicted worldwide apostasy reaching even to the top of the Church (we know from the statements of those who have read it, and from the reluctance of Church authorities to make it public, as Our Lady directed that it should be made public by 1960 at the latest, and especially from the absurdly phoney “secret” the Vatican II establishment released in the year 2,000 that is not a continuation of the words of Lucia leading from the second secret made public into the third secret, which said: “In Portugal the dogma of the faith will always remain...”). Another approved apparition of Our Lady of Quito in 1594 predicted similar things due to take place in the 20th century. This, and the message of La Salette also prophecied a glorious restoration of the Church. The message of Fatima concluded with “In the end my Immaculate Heart will triumph,” and that there would come a true Pope to consecrate Russia to the immaculate heart of Mary, as she requested, which would bring about its miraculous conversion: “The heart of the King is in the hand of the Lord, whithersoever He will, He shall turn it.” (Proverbs 21: 1).
In the Old Testament when the Jews were Gods people, they also had promises from God that the Divine covenant would stand firm until the coming of the Messiah, Jesus Christ. However, the King of Babylon invaded Jerusalem and destroyed the Temple, and killed most of the priests, and carried the people away captive into Babylon. It looked like it was all over with them, and that the gates of Hell had prevailed then too! The prophet Daniel prayed at that time, and said: “Deliver us not up for ever, we beseech Thee, for Thy name’s sake, and abolish not Thy covenant. And take not away Thy mercy from us for the sake of Abraham Thy beloved, and Isaac Thy servant, and Israel Thy holy one: To whom Thou hast spoken, promising that Thou would multiply their seed as the stars of heaven, and as the sand that is on the sea shore. For we, O Lord, are diminished more than any nation, and are brought low in all the earth this day for our sins. Neither is there at this time prince, or leader, or prophet, or holocaust, or sacrifice, or oblation, or incense, or place of firstfruits before Thee.” (Daniel 34-38). And God did restore His people. So it is now!  

It might be asked, are not the Jews Gods people of the Bible? Why then would they be the proponents of Atheism, crime, and every other disorder contrary to the laws and the plan of God for order in the world? And why would they be so hostile to Jesus Christ and the Catholic Church? Since Satan doesn’t cast out Satan, and Heaven doesn’t cast out Heaven?
The reason the Jews propagate atheism, which God has severely condemned, and why they viciously persecute and massacre the Church and Christians, is because the kingdom of Heaven was taken from the Jews and given to the Catholic Church founded by Jesus Christ, and the Old Covenant was voided. The stories of how Esau pursued persecuted Jacob, when Jacob was given Esau’s birthright (Genesis 27: 41), and how King Saul pursued and persecuted King David (1 Kings 15 – 2 Kings 2) when the latter was given Saul’s kingdom by God, is an allegory of the persecution of the Church by the Synagogue. If the Synagogue is no longer the kingdom of God, it does not propagate the kingdom of God in the world, which is a religious kingdom, it propagates a worldly kingdom, an atheistic kingdom, a sinful kingdom, which serves the Devil and not God.

Thus, the real Catholic Church founded by Jesus Christ, which is the Mystical Body of Christ, which “only those are to be considered members of the Church who profess the true faith and are baptized” (Mystici Corporis, 22, by Pope Pius XII), are reduced to pockets of faithful scattered here and there throughout the world awaiting the hand of God which will restore His kingdom in due time. As bleak as it looks at the present, where God is, there is the future! Jesus Christ said: “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but My word shall not pass away.”(Mark 13: 31). The New Vatican II Church is of this world, particularly of the New World Order, which will pass away. It is not the kingdom of Christ, who said “My kingdom is not of this world.” (John 18: 36). Because the Kingdom of Christ, The Mystical Body of Christ, which is the only true Church, is the Heavenly kingdom, a holy kingdom, which is in this world but not of this world.

In a time of crisis the majority always fall away. Therefore those of us who conform ourselves to God and are members of the one true Church, may become as few as Abraham and Noah were in their day, but they constitute the faithful remnant, “the root for the springing up again of Israel,” as St. Basil the Great said at the time of the Arian heresy in the 4th century, when the whole world seemed to have gone over to the Arian heresy. In opposition to modern errors, we still believe that nations and laws should be Catholic and thus, reject the separation of Church and state. As the Catholic Church always taught before Vatican II, we believe that the authority to govern comes from God not from the people. We believe in the death penalty for certain crimes, and in spanking as a method of correcting children, that wives ought to obey their husbands, and we abstain from all sin as from filthiness, especially from sex outside of marriage and contraception, and we believe that homosexuality is one of the four sins that cry to Heaven for God’s vengeance, as the pre-Vatican II Catechisms taught, and as the Bible teaches. Those who call themselves Catholics and who do not accept these things, but who go along with the prevailing notions on these issues, are heretics severed from the Church, if they hold to them pertinaciously. We only go to priests who are validly ordained, that is, ordained according to the pre-Vatican II rite. The rite introduced in 1968 is invalid and does not produce valid priests or bishops. Also, heretics lose all jurisdiction and office “ispo facto,” before God and before Catholics who know their faith. It stands to reason that the enemies of Jesus Christ who are intent on destroying the kingdom of Christ, which is built on the apostolic succession, would take aim at destroying the apostolic succession, leaving merely a semblance of it so as to deceive the majority of Catholics. Validly ordained priests who are at odds with the invalid and apostate Vatican II establishment, keep the true faith and the apostolic succession, which means that they keep the Church. “For we are children of the saints, and look for that life which God will give to those that never change their faith from Him.” (Tobias 2: 18). Even so, as grateful as we are to have these priests, and genuinely good priests too, we do not depend on them, because they too are heavily infiltrated, and or are capable of defecting. We look to God above all, in the true faith which is anchored in Sacred Tradition.

Explanation of The Rule of Faith by St. Vincent of Lerins: Doctor of the Church “Every care must be taken that we hold fast to what has been believed everywhere, always, and by all… For that is truly and in the strictest sense Catholic. This rule we shall observe if we follow universality, antiquity, consent… What then will a Catholic Christian do… if some novel contagion seek to infect not merely an insignificant portion of the Church, but the whole? Then it will be his care to cleave to antiquity, which at this day cannot possible be seduced by any fraud of novelty. But if in antiquity itself there be found error on the part of two or three men, or at any rate of a city or even a province? Then it will be his care by all means, to prefer the decrees, if such there be, of an ancient general council… But what if some error should spring up on which no such decree is found to bear? Then he must collate, consult, interrogate the opinions of the ancients, of those, namely, who, living in diverse times and places, yet continuing in the communion and faith of the one Catholic Church, stand forth acknowledged and approved authorities: and whatsoever he shall ascertain to have been held, written, taught, not by one or two of these only, but by all, equally and with one consent, openly, frequently, persistently, that he must understand that he himself also is to believe without any doubt or hesitation”.

“But because of false brethren unawares brought in, who can in privately to spy on our liberty, which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into servitude. To whom we yielded not by subjection, no not for an hour, that the truth of the Gospel might continue with you.” (Galatians 2: 4,5).
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proof of These Points

Saint Robert Bellarmine, Cardinal and Doctor of the Church, in De Romano Pontifice, II, 30: “A pope who is a manifest heretic automatically (per se) ceases to be pope and head, just as he ceases automatically to be a Christian and a member of the Church. Wherefore, he can be judged and punished by the Church. This is the teaching of all the ancient Fathers who teach that manifest heretics immediately lose all jurisdiction... This principle is most certain. The non-Christian cannot in any way be Pope, as Cajetan himself admits (ib, c. 26). The reason for this is that he cannot be head of what he is not a member; now he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian, as is clearly taught by St. Cyprian (lib. 4, epist. 2), St. Athanasius (Scr. 2, Cont. Arian), St. Augustine (lib. De great. Christ. Cap.20), St. Jerome (contra Lucifer.) and others; therefore, the manifest heretic cannot be Pope.”

Ecumenism was condemned by Pope Pius XI in his encyclical Mortalium Animos as  “tantamount to abandoning the religion revealed by God.” In other words, Vatican II’s Ecumenism is apostasy as well as heresy. The word “ecumenism” has a legitimate ecclesiastical meaning involving only true Catholics, but it is the Vatican II use of the word that Pope Pius XI condemned in 1928, because the movement that came into prominence after 1960 at Vatican II, was afoot at the time of Pope Pius XI. Ecumenism is just one example, although if there were no other heretical or apostate principle involved, that alone would be enough to make Vatican II a false Council, and to cause Church prelates and assenting popes loss of office on account of heresy. But nothing in Catholic doctrine, morals or worship was left untouched by the hands implementing Vatican II. “Not only do they subvert doctrine, but in doing so they even employ the exact phraseology, verbatim, which the Church has condemned… In Vatican II’s Decree on Ecumenism, we read the following: ‘Most valuable for this purpose are meetings of the two sides – especially for discussions of theological problems – where each can treat with the other on equal footing’. This teaching of Vatican II refers to “ecumenical dialogue” between Catholics and non-Catholics… Compare their words “equal footing” with the following teaching of Pope Leo XIII: ‘The Church, indeed, deems it unlawful to place the various forms of divine worship on the same footing as the true religion.’ Encyclical ‘Immortale Dei’.” (The Robber Church, Pt. 1, by Patrick Henry Omlor).

Canon 1258: (1917, pre-Vatican II code of Canon law): Forbids “communicatio in sacris”, that is, participation in the services of, or common worship with heretics and schismatic’s, under pain of grave mortal sin.

Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum: “The practice of the Church has always been the same, as is shown by the unanimous teaching of the Fathers, who were wont to hold as outside Catholic communion, and alien to the Church, whoever would recede in the least degree from any point of doctrine proposed by her authoritative Magisterium… St. Augustine (5th century) notes that other heresies may spring up, to a single one of which, should any give his assent, he is by that fact cut off from Catholic unity… it is necessary that the mission of teaching whatever Christ had taught should remain perpetual and immutable” ( 30, 28).

"For the Holy Spirit was not promised to the successors of Peter, that by His revelation they might make known new doctrine, but that by His assistance they might inviolably keep and faithfully expound the revelation or deposit of faith delivered through the Apostles" (Concerning the Infallible Teaching of the Roman Pontiff, Vatican Council, 1870, from "Dogmatic Canons and Decrees"). See: Catholic Harbor Of Faith And Morals.Com.

If the God of the Bible said that He was the only one, and that all the other Gods and religions besides the Catholic faith founded by Jesus Christ, were false, evil, and strictly forbidden, then it follows that all religions do not worship the same God under different forms. It looks nice and broadminded to say the Masonic thing, on the face of it, but all these religions contradicting one another in important things cannot be true. Like 2 + 2 = 4, the truth has only one right answer. If other religions were O.K., then why would God have to come from Heaven and be crucified, and establish His covenant to save the world? “Go teach all nations, baptizing them in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost, teaching them to observe all that I have told you. He who believes and is baptized will be saved. He who believes not, will be condemned, and behold, I Am with you all days even to the consummation of the world” (Matt. 28: 18 -20 & Mark 16: 16).

Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, ex cathedra: “… all those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only Pagans, but also Jews or heretics and schismatic’s, cannot share in eternal life…”

“For it was not enough for them to err about the knowledge of God, but whereas they lived in a great war of ignorance, they called so many and so great evils peace… And all things are mingled together, blood, murder, theft and dissimulation, corruption and unfaithfulness, tumults and perjury, disquieting of the good. Forgetfulness of God, defiling of souls, changing of nature, disorder in marriage, and the irregularity of adultery and uncleanness. For the worship of abominable idols is the cause, and the beginning and end of all evil.”  (Wisdom 14: 22-27).  

“Bear not the yoke with unbelievers, for what participation has justice with injustice? Or what fellowship has light with darkness? And what concord has Christ with Belial? Or what part has the faithful with the unbeliever? And what agreement has the Temple of God with idols? For you are the Temple of the living God; as God said… Wherefore, go out from among them and be separate, said the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing: And I will receive you; and I will be a Father to you…” (2 Cor. 6: 14-18).

A popular definition of Ecumenism is: “Catholics meeting together with non-Catholics to discuss what Catholics are not going to believe anymore”.

 “Thou helpest the ungodly, and thou art joined in friendship with them that hate the Lord, and therefore thou did indeed deserve wrath of the Lord” (2 Paralipomenon 19: 2). “I have hated the assembly of the malignant; and with the wicked I will not sit” (Psalm 25: 5).

The example of the Saints and the Apostles is ever the same: “He never had anything to do with the Meletian schismatics, aware of their wickedness and apostasy from the beginning. Nor did he have any friendly dealings with the Manicheans or any other heretics, except only to admonish them to return to the true religion. He thought and taught that friendship and association with them brought harm and ruin to the soul. So, too, he loathed the heresy of the Arians and he exhorted all not to go near them nor to share their perverted belief.” (The Life of St. Anthony, 68: His Loyalty to the Faith, P. 78, by St. Athanasius).

The spectacle of the Vatican II Popes worshipping with idolaters and every false religion in the world, is unprecedented in history, and is in flagrant contradiction to the Bible, and to all that the Church has taught from the time of Christ and the Apostles. “But though We, or an angel from Heaven, preach a Gospel to you besides that which We have preached to you, let him be anathema” (Galatians 1: 8). “Anathema” means cursed by God.

The Council of Elvira, A.D. 305: “It has been decreed that those who in adult age after receiving Baptism shall go into the pagan temples to worship idols, which is a deadly crime and the height of wickedness, shall not be admitted to communion even at death”. (Quoted from: “What Really Happened To The Catholic Church After Vatican II”, Ch. 16, P. 185, by Brothers Michael and Peter Dimond: VaticanCatholic.Com.).

St. Robert Bellarmine: in ”De Romano Pontifice”, II, 30: “… for men are not bound, or able to read hearts; BUT WHEN THEY SEE THAT SOMEONE IS A HERETIC BY HIS EXTERNAL WORKS, THEY JUDGE HIM TO BE A HERETIC PURE AND SIMPLE, AND CONDEMN HIM AS A HERETIC”. 

Pope Paul IV, Bull “Cum ex Apostolatus Officio”, Feb. 15, 1559: “6. In addition, [by this Our Constitution, which is to remain valid in perpetuity, We enact, determine, decree and define:] that if ever at any time it shall appear that any Bishop, even if he be acting as an Archbishop, Patriarch or Primate; or any Cardinal of the aforesaid Roman Church, or, as has already been mentioned, any legate, or even the Roman Pontiff, prior to his promotion or his elevation as Cardinal or Roman Pontiff, has deviated from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy: (i) the promotion or elevation, even if it shall have been uncontested and by the unanimous assent of all the Cardinals, shall be null, void and worthless; (ii) it shall not be possible for it to acquire validity (nor for it to be said that it has thus acquired validity) through the acceptance of the office, of consecration, of subsequent authority, nor through possession of administration, nor through the putative enthronement of a Roman Pontiff, or Veneration, or obedience accorded to such by all, nor through the lapse of any period of time in the foregoing situation; (iii) it shall not be held as partially legitimate in any way…  (vi) those thus promoted or elevated shall be deprived automatically, and without need for any further declaration, of all dignity, position, honour, title, authority, office and power… 7. Finally, [by this Our Constitution, which is to remain valid in perpetuity…”. See: Vatican Catholic. com. & TraditionalMass.org.

The Papal Coronation Oath: I Vow: To change nothing of the received Tradition, and nothing thereof I have found before me guarded by my pleasing predecessors, to encroach, to alter, or to permit any innovation therein; To the contrary: with glowing affection as Her truly faithful student and successor, to reverently safeguard the passed on good, with my whole strength and utmost effort; To cleanse all that is in contradiction with canonical order that may surface; To guard the holy Canons and Decrees of our Popes likewise as Divine ordinances of Heaven, because I am conscious of Thee, Whose place I take through the grace of God, Whose Vicarship I possess with Thy support, being subject to the severest accounting before Thy Divine tribunal over all that I confess. If I should undertake to act in anything of contrary sense, or should permit that it will be executed, Thou willst not be merciful to me on the dreadful day of Divine Justice. Accordingly, without exclusion, we subject to severest excommunication anyone – be it ourself or be it another – who would dare to undertake anything new in contradiction to this constituted evangelic tradition and the purity of the orthodox faith and the Christian religion, or would seek to change anything by his opposing efforts, or would concur with those who undertake such blasphemous venture”. (“Paul VI Beatified?” P. 282: Appendix 1, By: Fr. Luigi Villa Th. D.: The Apostolate of Our Lady of Good Success, Ph: (262) 567-0920).

Pope John XXIII was praised by Mexican Freemasonry for teaching Masonic doctrine (Masonic Bulletin, Year 18, No. 220, May 1963). The succeeding Popes and Vatican II went even further into the Illuminati agenda and religion than Rosicrucian Pope John XXIII (P. 27). In 1958, with the election of John XXIII, the question Pope Paul IV addressed with his decree Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio: “what if a heretic was elected to the papal chair?” finally happened!
“Let the clergy march under your banner in the belief always that they march under the banner of the Apostolic Keys” (Grand Orient Freemasonry Unmasked As The Hidden Power Behind Communism”, Ch. 14. P. 94, by Msgr. Dhillon). From Omni CBC Publications. This book was so approved by Pope Leo XIII that he published it himself.

The Vatican II establishment trying to give credit to Vatican II by appearing to “canonize” the apostate and antichrist Vatican II antipopes, is like trying to make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear! It is obviously a political abuse, not an act of the authoritive magisterium of the Church, which a real canonization is. If the antipopes are outside of the Church and have no authority before God, then all of these things are invalid.

 “He that enters not by the door into the sheepfold but climbs up another way, the same is a thief and a robber. But he that enters in by the door is the shepherd of the sheep. To him the porter opens; and the sheep hear his voice… But a stranger they follow not, but fly from him, because they know not the voice of strangers… Amen, amen I say to you, I Am the door of the sheep… The thief comes not but to steal, and to kill, and to destroy. I am come that they may have life, and may have it more abundantly. I am the good shepherd, the good shepherd gives his life for the sheep. But the hireling and he that is not the shepherd of the sheep, whose own the sheep are not, sees the wolf coming, and leaves the sheep, and flieth, and the wolf catches and scatters the sheep” (Jn. 10: 1-12). 

“The earth is infected by the inhabitants thereof: because they have transgressed the laws, they have changed the ordinance, they have broken the everlasting Covenant. Therefore shall a curse devour the earth, and the inhabitants thereof shall sin” (Isaias 24: 5,6).

Pope Leo XIII, Sapientiae Christianae: “It is a high crime indeed to withdraw allegiance from God in order to please men; an act of consummate wickedness to break the laws of Jesus Christ in order to yield obedience to earthly rulers… 'we ought to obey God rather than men' (Acts 5: 29)...  Commands that are issued adversely to the honor due to God and hence are beyond the scope of justice, must be looked upon as anything rather than laws… if the laws of men contain injunctions contrary to the eternal law of God, it is right not to obey them… Hence they who blame, and call sedition this steadfastness of attitude in the choice of duty, have not rightly apprehended the force and nature of true law... Law is of it's very essence a mandate of right reason, proclaimed by a properly constituted authority, for the common good. But true and legitimate authority is void of sanction, unless it proceed from God the supreme Ruler and Lord of all".

 Another implementation of Vatican II which shows the irreverent and sacrilegious nature of the changes, is Communion given in the hand (especially by lay people). Thank God that the new rite of Mass and ordination to the priesthood could not possibly be valid (therefore neither could their Eucharist’s), otherwise the specter of profanation and sacrilege would be horrendous (add to Communion in the hand, the amount of people receiving the sacrament in sin, now that the concept of sin and what constitutes sin have been done away with, and that the sacrament of Confession is rare in the new rite, and that the priests are not validly ordained and cannot validly absolve). Before Vatican II Holy Communion, which is the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus Christ, was received kneeling in prayer, and on the tongue, to provide for reverent adoration and to prevent profanation.

An official source also spoke of moving away from “Biblical literalism”, contrary to the Decree On The Canonical Scriptures from The Council of Trent. As one author said of the holy and illustrious Pope Marcellus who intended to convoke the Council of Trent and employ the much maligned but innocent Jesuits for the reform of the Church: “For this purpose he intended to use the new Society of Jesus, for he was a warm friend of St. Ignatius, and loved him and the sincere and simple men who followed him, for the same reason that worldly men hated and despised them: because, like the Pope, they loved Christ and took His words quite literally.” (Philip II, Ch. 10, P. 173, by William Thomas Walsh, from Tan Books).

Bible quotes are from the Douay-Rheims Bible, referred to in the following Church Decree. It is so called after the towns in France where the Old Testament was first published with approval after the invention of the printing press in 1609, and the New Testament in 1582. The slowness of the Church to make the Bible available to the public was due to the fact that the Church took its mandate to preserve that revelation uncorrupted and unaltered very seriously in those days, and it took time to translate the Bible from Latin into an accurate vernacular.

 Decree Concerning The Canonical Scriptures, from The Council of Trent.  "This Gospel, of old promised through the prophets in the Holy Scriptures, Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, promulgated first with His own mouth, and then commanded it to be preached by His Apostles to every creature (Matt. 28: 19), (Mk. 16: 15), as the source of all saving truth and rules of conduct. It also clearly perceives that these truths and rules are contained in the written books and in the unwritten traditions, which, received by the Apostles from the mouth of Christ Himself, or from the Apostles themselves, the Holy Ghost dictating, have come down to us, transmitted as it were, from hand to hand. Following the example of the orthodox fathers, it receives and venerates with a feeling of piety and reverence, all the books both of the Old and New Testaments, since one God is the author of both; also the traditions, whether they relate to faith or to morals, as having been dictated either orally by Christ or by the Holy Ghost, and preserved in the Catholic Church in unbroken succession… If anyone does not accept as sacred and canonical the aforesaid books in their entirety… as they have been accustomed to be read in the Catholic Church and as they are contained in the Latin Vulgate Edition, and knowingly and knowingly and deliberately rejects the aforesaid traditions, let him be anathema (that means, accursed by God  –ed.)… Moreover, the same holy council… ordains and declares that the Old Latin Vulgate Edition which, in use for so many hundred years, has been approved by the Church… and that no-one dare or presume under any pretext whatsoever to reject it… Furthermore… it decrees that no-one relying on his own judgment in matters of faith and morals… presume to interpret them contrary to that sense which holy mother Church , to whom it belongs to judge of their true sense and interpretation, has held… or even contrary to the unanimous teaching of the Fathers…". (Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent, “Decree Concerning the Canonical Scriptures” 1546: P. 17, 1978 Printing, available from Tan Books: 1-800-437-5876).
                                                     + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

In Oct. 1917, the Blessed Virgin mother of Jesus Christ appeared at Fatima telling them that Russia was the instrument chosen by God to punish the world for sin. She said that Russia would “spread its errors throughout the world, raising up wars and persecutions of the Church”, and that Russia would be the instrument chosen by God to punish Christian nations for sins she described at Fatima and La Salette in 1846, as the profanation of marriage, blasphemy, and failure to keep Sunday holy. At Fatima she said that the sins that send the most people to Hell are sins of the flesh. That is, all sex that is not between a validly married couple for the purpose of procreation, including impure thoughts consented to. The Communist revolution took place in Russia at the same time. “In Rome Freemasonry was celebrating its 200th anniversary – everywhere… flags and posters depicting St. Michael the Archangel being trampled underfoot by Lucifer. Long processions winded their way through the Eternal City towards St. Peters. The marchers sang blasphemous songs and carried banners with slogans such as: “Satan will reign in the Vatican, and the Pope will be his servant” (Fr. Karl Stehlin, SSPX, “Militia Immaculatae of Maximillian Kolbe”, from Angelus Press). Kolbe was a Catholic priest who died at Auchwitz in 1941, he volunteered to die so that the father of a family could live. Communism was only one phase of the Masonic agenda.

Before Pope (Saint) Pius X (Cardinal Sarto) was elected, in 1903, at the conclave that elected that great and holy Pope, the first choice for the Papacy had to be annulled. Why? Because they elected Cardinal Rampolla, and an eminent and respected priest, Msgr. Jouin, together with Emperor Franz Joseph of Austria, who had intervenor status with the Vatican, communicated to Cardinal Puzyna of Krakow, Poland, conclusive evidence that Rampolla was chief Luciferian high-priest of Ordo Templis Orientis – Illuminati Freemasons. Until the death of Pope Pius XII in 1958, the Popes declared that association with Freemasonry or its works incurs “ispo facto” excommunication. Freemasonry pretends to be a benevolent fraternity that’s good for business, but they don’t tell many members that they worship the Devil in the higher degrees, and plot to destroy true CatholicismH P. 29. The Popes declared these laws perpetually valid and irrevocable. They are so by their nature. Pope Leo XII said in “Quo Graviora”. Masonic oaths don’t bind, nor does any oath or obedience that has something sinful or against God for its object: (Summa Theologica by St. Thomas Aquinas: Q. 104, “On Obedience”, 6 articles, Vol. 3). To knowingly make a sinful agreement, is a sin.
Pope Leo XIII, Rampolla’s boss, perhaps had no idea of how close the threat he wrote of in the original form of his prayer to St. Michael the Archangel (P. 77), and in his encyclicals “Satis Cognitum”, and “On Freemasonry” was. “What possibly happened to the Pope after he wrote these warnings to the world was perhaps revealed in a Time magazine article on June 18, 1984. The article said this: ‘there were whispers about how poison killed Pope Leo XIII in 1903’. “ (Masonry, Conspiracy Against Christianity, Ch. 36, P. 280, by Ralph Epperson, Publius Press, Ph. (520) 886-4380). Time magazine should know, it is a major player in the Masonic establishment.

Jesus Christ said: “The truth will set you free” (Jn. 8: 32). And, “The people that does not understand will be beaten” (Osee 4: 14).

Believe it or not: In Atheist Masonic Europe, people are going to jail for holding that the Vatican II Popes are invalid, and that the See of St. Peter has been vacant since the death of Pope Pius XII in 1958. Even though there is no law saying that it is illegal. Google: Pater Lingen. Compare this with human rights legislation!

Why Have We Not Heard Of This From The Church and From The Media?   If the media is a Masonic institution, and if the changes in the Church are a Masonic work, it stands to reason that the media would cooperate by ignoring it, because if the mainstream of Catholics knew what was happening, they would resist, maintain the integrity of their faith, and the money from the collection plate would stop. That the media has virtually ignored such a colossal news story affecting the lives of millions of people, given the influence the Church had on the world, while it harps on minor incidents and red herring issues, as Pope Pius XI pointed out in his encyclical On Atheistic Communism, is proof in itself of these things. Freemasonry must hide its works and deny what they are, because they are bad.
Great anti-Catholic massacres have taken place in countries such as Ukraine, Russia, Spain, Mexico, Eastern Europe, Cambodia, Vietnam, and Rwanda in the 20th Century wiping out millions, but, as Pope Pius XI pointed out in this encyclical, and the media either completely ignored them, or reported some few of them omitting the Anti-Catholic aspect to them. Freemasonry is behind the whole New World Order, and it took over the Catholic Church after the death of Pope Pius XII in 1958, and that’s why the world has heard virtually nothing of these things, and why the majority of Catholics know nothing of these things, and almost as little about what they are supposed to believe and do as Catholics.
If the majority of Catholics were what a Catholic should be, virginity until marriage would be commonplace, Catholic men and women would be conspicuous for modesty of dress, divorce and remarriage would be limited to non-Catholics, and Catholic families would be large, as they were before Vatican II, and it would be easy to find a doctor who would refuse to refer abortions, commit euthanasia, or prescribe contraceptives (I tried and I could not find even one – including from a list of Catholic doctors I got from a Catholic source), and Catholics would refuse to work on Sundays (except for doctors, nurses, police, and firefighters, who are allowed to work on Sundays by the Divine law). In the wake of so-called Vatican II it appears as if real Catholics are as rare as whiteflys these days, but the Churches are full on Sundays, and rank and file of these Churches are none the wiser, for the above stated reasons!

 The Diabolic Nature of the Enemy Now Within: “This limpid and impetuous stream has been harnessed in its course by  the modern enemies of the Church and is now no more than a miserable affluent of the great movement of apostasy being organized in every country for the establishment of a one-world Church which shall have neither dogmas, nor hierarchy; neither discipline for the mind, nor curb for the passions; and which, under the pretext of freedom and human dignity, would bring back to the world the reign of legalized and cunning force, and the oppression of the weak and of those who toil and suffer” (Pope St. Pius X, Our Apostolic Mandate). Author Alice Bailey, founder of Lucis Trust, publisher to the United Nations, wrote this in her book: Externalization of the Heirarchy, P. 511 & 510: “The three main channels through which preparation for the New Age is going on might be regarded as the Church, the Masonic fraternity and the educational field… eventually, there will appear the Church Universal, and its definite outlines will appear towards the close of this century” (The New World Order, Ch. 1, P. 5, 8, by Ralph Epperson). The word “Catholic” means “universal”. This obviously refers to an unholy “Catholic” church: “The Universal Church of Man”, to supplant the One, Holy and Apostolic Catholic Church of the living God. It is logical and more Satanically correct to destroy the Divine institution by taking it over by infiltration, and turning it into a vehicle of the other cause. This “Liturgical Reform” was written about by Roca, an apostate and Freemason in 1883: “‘The Divine cult in an Ecumenical Council shall undergo a transformation that will put it in harmony with the state of modern civilization’. Roca’s plan for the introduction of Christianity into the Masonic “Universal Religion” provided for: A) A doctrinal adaptation, which presupposed the equivalence of all cults and religious views; B) New dogmas, primarily that of Evolution, which presupposes Gnostic Pantheism and Integral Humanism, for the passage of the mission of the Church from the mystical and sacramental (supernatural) sphere to the political-social (natural) one; C) A rapprochement with Freemasonry; D) The birth of the “priests of the future,” whom are to involve themselves with the “social” and abandon the “supernatural”.” (Paul VI Beatified? Appendix 2: “The 5 Pointed Star, Signature of the Papacy of Paul VI”, P. 316, by Fr. Luigi Villa, Th.D, from Angelus Press). Also, most sinister of all, on the picture of Baphomet, the Devil as worshipped by the O.T.O. and the Rosicrucians – Illuminati Freemasons, are the words: “Solve et Coagula”, which expresses the Satanic agenda to break down and “reform.”

"Whoever revolts and continues not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that continues in the doctrine, the same hath both the Father and the Son. If any man comes to you and brings not this doctrine, receive him not into the house nor say to him, God speed you, for whoever says to him: God speed you, communicates with his wicked works" (2 Jn. 1: 9-11).  

“Walk then, as children of the light. For the fruit of the light is in all goodness, and justice, and truth; proving what is well pleasing to God. Have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.  For the things that are done by them in secret, it is a shame to even speak of. But all things that are reproved are made manifest by the light; for all that is made manifest is light” (Eph. 5: 8-12).

As one illuminati website put it in an article I read there for research purposes Sept. 10, 2011: “All the world is a stage and everything of importance that occurs in it, is planned to happen that way. It is through this Illuminati system of intertwining secret societies that the entire world is ultimately run. The vital control centers of this mechanism are the three Illuminati city states, all of which are separate self governing states within host countries: 1). London, which is the center for monetary control. 2). Washington, D.C. which is the center for military control. 3). Vatican City which is the center for spiritual control.”

The Illuminati did not go out of existence when the Bavarian government shut Weishaupt down in the 1700s. They merged with Freemasonry at the Convent of Wilhelmsbad in 1782, and continued on, using Freemasonry as a cover for their activities. Since Vatican II in the 1960s, they use the Church as a cover for themselves now, too. The name “Illuminati” derives from “Lucifer”, which means, “The light bearer”. Nor is it true to say that the Illuminati are a society based soley on reason, as they tell the masses of themselves. The Illuminati are a profoundly religious movement, but a religion that worships Lucifer, the Devil: “Among the intelligence community, Illuminists are referred to as ‘Moriah, the Conquering Wind.’ Illuminists also use I.O.D. to identify themselves to one another. I.O.D stands for Illuminates of Thanaderos, which is a combination of the word, ‘than,’ meaning death and ‘deros,’ meaning a demonic body. This explanation should help to make clear just what the Illuminati stands for.” (The Illuminati In America, Ch. 9, P. 59, 60, by Dr. John Coleman, 2008).

“The dream of world domination has haunted the imagination of many races from the time of Alexander the Great to Napoleon I , but nowhere has the plan been carried out by the Machiavellian methods which have characterized the Prussian foreign policy and diplomacy from the days of Frederick the Great onwards… But it is further the abandonment of all principle, the acceptance of the doctrine that everything is allowable – lying, treachery, calumny, bad faith – in order to achieve its end… Robison describes the system of the Illuminati as leading to the conclusion that ‘nothing would be scrupled at, if it could be made appear that the order would derive advantage from it, because the great object of the order was held as superior to every consideration’… so also the most striking characteristic of the French revolution under the inspiration of Weishaupt’s emissaries and agents of Prussia, and of the present revolutionary movement inaugurated by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, is not so much its violence as its Machiavellian cunning… of making black appear white by glorifying the most ignoble actions, of making white appear black by holding up all honorable traditions to contempt and ridicule, in a word, perversion has been reduced to a system by the secret directors of world revolution… The working man of all countries is the least Machiavellian of beings; his weakness lies in the fact that he is too inarticulate, that he does not know how to put his case even when he has a good one, still less make a bad one appear plausible. It was not until world revolution was taken over by a faction described by Bakunin as “the German Jew Company” that it reassumed its Machiavellian character…” (Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, Ch. 14, P. 353-355, by Nesta Webster). From Omni CBC Publications.

“The … documents reveal as the real object of the Illuminati the elaboration and propagation of a popular new religion… The object of pure (illuminated) Freemasonry is none other than the propagation of the “enlightenment” (so-called) whereby the seed of the new world will be so widely scattered that no efforts at extirpation, however violent, will avail to prevent the harvest… Weishaupt later declared… that Masonry was the school from which these ideas emanated. These objects of the order were to be revealed to members only after their promotion to the “priestly degree”… The preliminary degrees were to serve for the selection, preparation, and concealment of the true “illuminati”; the others were to open the way for the free religion, and social organization of the future, in which all distinctions of nations, creeds, etc., would disappear… Members were acquainted only with their immediate superiors … Concerning all persons with whom they had intercourse (i.e., dealings) they were to gather information, and on all matters which could possibly affect themselves or the order they were to hand in sealed reports; these were opened by superiors unknown to the writers… The purpose of this and other regulations was enable the order to attain its object, by securing for it a controlling influence in all directions… All Illuministic and official organs, the press, schools, seminaries, cathedral chapters (hence too, all appointments to Sees, pulpits, and chairs) were to be brought as far as possible under the influence of the organization, and princes themselves were to be surrounded by a legion of enlightened men, in order not only to disarm opposition, but also to compel them to energetic co-operation. A complete transformation would be thus effected; public opinion would be controlled; “priests and princes” would find their hands tied; the marplots who ventured to interfere would repent of their temerity; and the order would become an object of dread to all.” (Catholic Encyclopedia, see footnote P. 13). Imagine what the outcry would be if Catholics infiltrated the Synagogue or other institutions to take them over and destroy the original? Imagine Popes and Bishops telling Catholics to report to them on their neighbors, friends, co-workers and employers “to secure a controlling influence in all directions”, and to slander and persecute those who oppose them? Imagine Catholic priests or laity not knowing the hierarchical chain of command, and where the buck stops? Isn’t it a sign of integrity that the world can know that 10 or so out of the 260 Popes of history did unPopely things? The world can never know the deeds of the hidden masters of its enemies, or even who they really are!

With Freemasonry, the opposite of everything is true. Freemasons, with their horrible blood oaths to hidden masters, and secrecy, are not freemen. Also, through preaching sexual license, they are able to exercise a covert system of control, and most of them are controlled by blackmail.
“So then, brethren, we are not the children of the bondwoman, but of the free: by the freedom wherewith Christ made us free” (Galatians 4: 31).

The Cure of Ars said that it was not the enemies of Jesus Christ that he feared, but bad Catholics. This is because truth and goodness are so much more potent than evil, that all the power of the wicked depends on the laxity and indifference of Catholics! No wonder Christ said in the Apocalypse that He preferred even His enemies to lukewarm or moderate Catholics (the moderately Catholic). “I know thy works, that thou art neither cold, nor hot. I would thou wert cold, or hot. But because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold, nor hot, I will begin to vomit thee out of My mouth” (Apocalypse 3: 15,16). When the faith is under attack, if the moderately Catholic do not side with the enemy, they at least strengthen their hand: “As in so many persecutions of the Church, before and since, the enemy received decisive support at the critical moment from ‘broad minded’, compromising, political Catholics who were either willing to sell Christ for a consideration, or more commonly, were deceived or frightened into thinking, in their flabby souls, that their temporizing would best serve the cause.” (Philip II, P. 46, Ch.3: “Henry VIII Divorce”, by William Thomas Walsh). From Tan Books.  If Catholics had half the knowledge of their faith and current issues concerning it, diligence in action, and cohesion that the enemies of Jesus Christ have, the latter would never have gotten anywhere.

“Because they receive not the love of truth, that they might be saved. Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying: That all may be judged who have not believe the truth, but have consented to iniquity.” (2 Thess. 2: 10.11).

More About Have The Gates Of Hell Prevailed? The rise to power, even in the Church, of the forces of evil, does not mean that they have prevailed. The same God who promised that the gates of Hell would not prevail, also dictated the Apocalypse and the Book of Daniel which said that the forces of Antichrist would be universally triumphant, and that they would “encompass the camp of the saints”, and “would crush the people of the saints, for a time, and times, and half a time”. But that “judgment would sit and the books would be opened and that his power would be taken away”. When Christ was crucified, His enemies thought that they had won. No! As Jesus Christ Himself said to them, “this is your hour, and the power of darkness” (Luke 22: 53), and He rose again from the dead, and the rest is history! “For I say to you that God is able of these stones to raise up children to Abraham” (Luke 3: 8). Perhaps the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah reproached Abraham with this, seeing that Abraham was virtually alone in his day, and the whole world was becoming like them. But it was to Abraham that God said that He would make him “a father of many nations” (Gen. 17: 4), and that God would multiply his seed “like the stars of Heaven, and as the sand that is by the sea shore” (Gen. 22: 17), and so it happened.

St. John Chrysostom: 347-407 A.D. Doctor of the Church, said: “Is the Church made up of walls? The Church is in the multitude of the faithful. What an array of immutable pillars, not clasped by iron, but bound by faith! I say not that so vast a multitude is more ardent than fire, but if it consisted of one, you could not overcome that one. You know the wounds the Martyrs inflicted on you. Many a time a tender maiden was brought into court (Christianity was formally outlawed shortly before those days in 404 A.D): she was softer than wax, and she became harder than a rock. You tore her sides, yet you took not her faith.” (Leaves From St. John Chrysostom, “Built Upon A Rock”, P. 192, translated by Mary H. Allies, Imprimatur (Ecclesiastical approbation) 1888, Burns & Oates Publishers).

Letter Of St. Athanasius To His Flock, 371 A.D. Doctor of the Church: “May God console you! What saddens you is the fact that others have occupied the Churches by violence, while during this time you are on the outside… They can occupy our Churches, but they are outside the true faith. You remain outside the places of worship, but the true faith dwells in you. Let us consider what is more important, the place or the faith? The true Faith obviously! Who has lost and who has won in this struggle – the one who keeps the premises or the one who keeps the faith?... You are the ones who are happy, you who remain in the Church by your faith, and hold firmly to the foundations of faith that has come down to you from Apostolic tradition. And if an execrable jealousy has tried to shake it on a number of occasions, it has not succeeded. They are the ones who have broken away from it in the present crisis. No-one will ever prevail against your faith, beloved brothers, and we believe that God will give us back our Churches some day. Thus the more violently they try to occupy the places of worship, the more they separate themselves from the Church. They claim that they represent the Church, but in reality, they are the ones who are expelling themselves from it and going astray. Even if Catholics faithful to tradition are reduced to a handful, they are the ones who are the true Church of Jesus Christ”.                                                                                                                                                                       

  St. Basil The Great: 330-379 Doctor of the Church: "Matters have come to this pass: the people have left their houses of prayer, and assembled in the deserts, a pitiable sight, women and children, old men, and men otherwise infirm, wretchedly faring in the open air, amid the most profuse rains and snow-storms and winds and frosts of winter, and again in summer, under a scorching sun. To this they submit, because they will have no part in the wicked Arian leaven".

That the 1,000 years reign of Jesus Christ predicted in the Apocalypse is past, and not to come, is a tenable theory if one considers that at Fatima, the Blessed Virgin told Lucia that we are living in the end times. The triumph of Constantine in 314 A.D. was the beginning of Christendom, and that the 1400s was the beginning of the disintegration of Christendom. Similarly, “the Prince of this world” (Jn. 12: 31) (meaning Satan who had power over the whole world then) was cast out by the triumph of Christ on the Cross at Calvary, and the Eastern Schism occurred at the turn of the first millennium, thus beginning the disintegration of Christendom: “And when the thousand years shall be finished, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, and shall go forth and seduce the nations, which are over the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, and shall gather them together to battle, the number of whom is as the sand of the sea. And they came upon the breadth of the earth, and encompassed the camp of the saints, the beloved city. And there came down fire from God out of Heaven and devoured them” (Apoc. 20: 7-9).

“And he shall speak words against the High One, and shall crush the saints of the Most High: and he shall think himself able to change times and laws, and they shall be delivered into his hand until a time, and times, and half a time. And judgment shall sit, that his power may be taken away, and be broken in pieces, and perish even to the end. And that the kingdom, and power, and the greatness of the kingdom, under the whole Heaven, may be given to the people of the saints of the Most High: whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all kings shall serve Him, and shall obey Him” (Dan.7: 25-27).

Prophecy by Bl. Ann-Marie Taigi: “Holy Father, the Freemasons… will grow and there will come a time when they will seem to be the most absolute masters. But God will destroy them in a terrible manner” (Cardinal Caro Rodriguez of Chile, 1928, “The Mystery of Freemasonry Unveiled”, P. 247, Pt. 6, Ch.3. See P. 65.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“And the Jews seeing the multitudes, were filled with envy, and contradicted those things that were said by Paul, blaspheming. Then Paul and Barnabas said boldly: To you it behoved us first to speak the word of God: but because you reject it, and judge yourselves unworthy of eternal life, behold we turn to the Gentiles. For so the Lord hath commanded us: ‘I have set thee to be a light to the Gentiles; that thou may be for salvation unto the utmost parts of the earth’ (Isaias 49: 6). And the Gentiles hearing it, were glad, and glorified the word of the Lord: and as many as were ordained to life everlasting, believed.” (Acts 13: 45-48).

The Exultet: ”Let the Angelic choirs of Heaven now rejoice; let the Divine mysteries rejoice; and let the trumpet of salvation sound forth the victory of so great a King. Let the earth also rejoice, made radiant by such splendor; and, enlightened with the brightness of the eternal King, let it know that the darkness of the whole world is scattered. Let our mother the Church also rejoice, adorned with the brightness of so great a light; and let this temple resound with the loud acclamation of the people.
This is the night in which, destroying the chains of death, Christ arose victorious from the grave. For it had not profited us to be born, if it profited us not to be redeemed. O, inestimable affection of love! To redeem a slave Thou didst deliver up Thy Son! O truly needful sin of Adam, which was blotted out by the death of Christ! O happy fault, which merited to possess such and so great a Redeemer! O truly blessed night, which alone deserved to know the time and hour when Christ rose again from the tomb!” (1958 Roman Missal, from the Holy Saturday Liturgy, Prayer after “The Blessing of the New Fire”, and “The Blessing of the Paschal Candle”).

“Who believes not the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abides on him” (Jn. 3: 36).

“Before man is life and death, good and evil, that which he shall choose shall be given him.” (Ecclesiasticus 15: 18).


  Modernization was the plausible pretext behind which the Church was gutted of its Catholic substance, and turned into a Masonic institution with an honorary Pope, like the Queen of England is only honorary royalty, without any real power. The concept of bringing the Church up to date may seem plausible to nominal Catholics who do not know their faith, and to the world at large. However, modernization is not relevant to the Church because the Church is a Heavenly and Divine institution, not a human or a worldly one. The Church and her representatives are supposed to resemble the eternal and unchangeable perfect Kingdom of Heaven, not any one of the kingdoms of this earth. The Church was founded by God for every time and every place and for every people, not only for Westerners of the 21st century. The so-called “modern world” is a Masonic world, and a very sinful world, and the attempt to “up-date” the Church is a pretext to conform the Church to what it ought not to resemble at all. The Divine directives tell us to “Be not conformed to this world”, (Rom. 12: 2), even under the best of circumstances: “because all that is in the world, is the concupiscence of the flesh, and the concupiscence of the eyes, and the pride of life, which is not of the Father, but is of the world” (1 Jn. 2: 16).

The implication behind the concept of modernization is the so-called evolution of man; that is, that man is in the process of evolution, and that all previous social forms, ideologies and religions were part of man in the process of evolution. This philosophy holds that atheism is the philosophy of the evolved man. That is the opposite of the truth. The Catholic faith teaches that Divine revelation is perfect and complete and represents the pinnacle of all progress. “Thou hast forsaken Me, saith the Lord, thou are gone backward.” (Jeremias 15: 6). The truth is, that what the modern pundits call progress or going forward, is really going backward, degeneration back to the degrading condition of paganism, which the truth of God set us free from. If man was improving, he would become more like the Angels, the highest of God’s creation, who are perfectly obedient and faithful to God, not like the Devils, who rebelled against God. For the best results, follow the Makers instructions!

“It was Christianity that first affirmed the real and universal brotherhood of all men of whatever race and condition. This doctrine she proclaimed by a method, and with an amplitude and conviction, unknown to preceding centuries; and with it she potently contributed to the abolition of slavery. Not by bloody revolution, but by the inner force of her teaching.” (Pope Pius XI, “Atheistic Communism”, 36).

 “A time shall come such as never was from the time that nations began even until that time.” (Dan. 12: 1). God knew all about the modern world when He ended His revelation at the death of the last Apostle, and the only special provision He made for it was to tell us not to listen to modern propaganda. He also told us to keep what He had given until He returns to judge mankind at the end of the world. Indeed, of these times Sacred Scripture says: “In the last times some shall depart from the Faith, giving heed to spirits of error, and doctrines of Devils” (1 Tim. 4: 1). “For there shall be a time when they will not endure sound doctrine; but according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears. And will indeed turn away their hearing from the truth, but will be turned unto fables” (2 Tim. 4: 3,4). At Fatima in 1917, the Blessed Virgin told Lucia that we were living in the end times, and that the prophecies in Sacred Scripture relating thereto, now apply. “And we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and of our gathering together unto Him: That you be not easily moved from your sense, nor be terrified… as if the day of the Lord was at hand. Let no man deceive you by any means, for unless there come a revolt first, and the man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition, who opposes, and is lifted up above all that is called God, or that is worshipped, so that he sits in the temple of God, shewing himself as if he were God… Whose coming is according to the working of Satan, in all power, and signs and lying wonders, and in all seduction of iniquity to them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. Therefore, God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying: that all may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity… Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle.” (2 Thess. 2: 1-14).
 Many believe that Vatican II is the revolt St. Paul spoke of in this prophecy. The Humanism of Paul VI, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI, could well be seen as man lifting himself up above God and all that is called God so that he sits in the temple of God showing himself as if he were God. The man of sin would certainly implement giving Holy Communion in the hand, with the continual and heinous sacrileges that it causes, enforce heresy and false worship, and be an idolater continually worshipping and paying homage to false religions, as these Antipopes have done.

“In this we know that we love the children of God: when we love God, and keep His Commandments.” (1 Jn. 5: 2).

Modernization only concerns the outer trappings of life. It only changes how one gets to work. In the old days, one walked or rode a horse. Nowadays one drives a car. The Divine law does not concern itself with that, but with whether one is faithful to ones marriage vows, chaste if not married, honest in ones dealings with the government and with his neighbor, and faithful in maintaining the true worship of the true God, shunning every other: “This Apostolic See… it’s proper and special mission is to defend truth, justice and all those eternal values” (Pope Pius XI, in “Atheistic Communism”, 4). The modern world did not change human nature, it only created more sinners. Making greater the need for “penance and the remission of sins” (Luke 24: 47), which  is what Jesus Christ was sacrificed and founded the Church for, but which is precisely what the changes of Vatican II took away, in the name of being hip. Conversion, penance and the remission of sins are the conditions for salvation, that is, admittance to eternal Heaven after death. The alternative is eternal Hellfire when this short and fleeting life in the modern world ends. “Which of you can dwell with devouring fire? Which of you shall dwell with everlasting burnings? He that walks in justices, and speaks truth, and casts away avarice by oppression, and shakes his hands from all bribes, that stops his ears lest he hear blood, and shuts his eyes that he may see no evil. He shall dwell on High, the fortifications of rocks shall be his highness: bread is given him, and his waters are sure. His eyes shall see the King in His beauty, they shall see the land far off” (Isaias 33: 14-17).

Those who are faithful to God and are conformed to Him, have a relish for holy things, which is a grace that comes from the Holy Spirit. Such people loved the timeless and transcendent beauty of the Heavenly institution the way it was. Sinners and the ungodly who didn’t have this Heavenly grace, and who consequently only relish worldly and sensual things, are the ones who wanted the Church to be adapted to suit them: “Now we have received not the spirit of this world, but the spirit that is of God; that we may know the things that are given us by God… But the sensual man perceives not the things that are of the Spirit of God” (1 Cor. 2: 12-14). The Church is for the faithful, not for the unfaithful! “The Lord hates all abomination of error, and they that fear Him shall not love it… The Lord is only for them that wait upon Him in the way of justice and truth” (Ecclusus. 15: 13 & 34: 22).

“Show them the form of the house, and of the fashion thereof, the goings out and the comings in, and the whole plan thereof, and all its ordinances, and all its order, and all its laws, and thou shalt write it in their sight: that they may keep the whole form thereof, and its ordinances, and do them. This is the law of the house of the Lord on the top of the mountain: all its borders round about is most holy.” (Ezechiel 43: 11, 12).

The pre-Vatican II Romanesque or Gothic Churches communicate the faith and promote prayer, devotion and adoration. The modern ones do not. In fact they are barren and meaningless, and they frustrate Divine worship and insinuate godlessness and heresy. They are evil fruits of an evil tree (Matt. 7: 18). “Her priests have despised My law, and have defiled My sanctuaries: they have put no difference between holy and profane” (Ezechiel 22: 26).

"The race of man, after its miserable fall from God, the Creator and the giver of heavenly gifts, 'through the envy of the Devil' (Wisd.2: 24)  separated into two diverse and opposite parts, of which the one steadfastly contends for truth and virtue, the other, for those things that are contrary to truth and virtue. The one, is the kingdom of God on earth, namely, the true Church of Jesus Christ; and those who desire to be united with it, so as to gain salvation, must of necessity serve God and His only begotten Son with their whole mind and an entire will. The other is the kingdom of Satan, in whose possession and control are all whosoever follow the fatal example of their leader and our first parents, those who refuse to obey the Divine and eternal law" (Pope Leo XIII, "On Freemasonry": 1 & 31: in "A Light In The Heavens" available from Tan Books: 1-800-437-5876).

“Rejoice not in ungodly children, if they be multiplied: neither be delighted in them, if the fear of God be not with them. Trust not to their life, and respect not their labors. For better is one that fears God, than a thousand ungodly children. For it is better to die without children, than to leave ungodly children. By one that is wise a country shall be inhabited, the tribe of the ungodly shall become desolate… The ancient giants did not obtain pardon for their sins, who were destroyed trusting to their own strength: And He spared not the place where Lot sojourned, but abhorred them for the pride of their word. He had not pity on them, destroying the whole nation that extolled themselves in their sins. So did He with the 600, 000 footmen, who were gathered together in the hardness of their heart: and if one of them had been stiffnecked, it is a wonder if he escaped unpunished: For mercy and wrath are with Him. He is mighty to forgive, and to pour out indignation: According as His mercy is, so His correction judges a man according to his works” (Ecclesiasticus 16: 1-13).

The New Jerusalem described in the Apocalypse is the city of the future, which will come at the end of the world after the judgment of all mankind by Jesus Christ: “There shall not enter into it anything defiled, or that works abomination, or that makes a lie, but they that are written in the Book of Life of the Lamb.” (Apoc. 21: 27).

Was “Dicipline Arcane” esotericism?  “The discipline arcane” of the early Church was not an esoteric form of Christianity, as has been contended.  It was an expedient for concealing holy things and preventing them from falling into the hands of the Pagans and idolaters and being profaned by them. In those days the Church was subjected to a “search and destroy” campaign by the Roman Emperors, which meant that Christians had to gather in secret and protect their holy things from profanation and destruction. The Catacombs in Rome were used by the early Christians as secret meeting places, for worship, and for burying the martyrs. Archbishop Fulton Sheen says that the Catacombs were known to the Roman authorities, but he also said “Fr. DeMarchi estimated that some 6,000,000 Christians were buried in the Catacombs, and that if the galleries could be placed end on end they would stretch for six hundred miles” (This Is Rome, P. 78, by Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen, 1959). In this book, the Archbishop also speaks of Churches in private homes (like traditional Catholics have now): “Until the first persecution under Nero there was probably no secret about them, but when the Christians had attracted the attention of the police (who arrested those who refused to worship Pagan deities, which was mandatory) a blanket of silence and mystery descended upon them and the faithful went to them in secret and did not talk about them for fear of implicating the owners” (Ibid. 52). This was the function of the “Discipline Arcane”.
Catholicism requires the open profession of its doctrine, as the multitudes of Martyrs attest to. And the historic opposition of the Church to any corruption of that doctrine, otherwise known as heresy, from the time of the Apostles, and the death penalty and curses mandated by God throughout the Book of Deuteronomy in the Old Testament to any deviation from what was recorded in Sacred Scripture, also attests to the fact that God did not give one standard to the public, and another to a few “initiated” elites. Such a contention is obviously a scam, since the standard of the Bible is upright, exclusive and immutable, while esotericism is the opposite, as Satan is the opposite of God.
Esotericism was deceitfully called Sacred Tradition by wicked men who tried to bring in Gnostic and other Pagan ideas into the Synagogue just prior to the advent of Christ, reasoning away the obvious contradiction of those ideas to the doctrine of Sacred Scripture by saying that it is due to a secret doctrine God gave to Moses with the Ten Commandments. But God refutes those wicked men: “I am the Lord, and there is no other. I have not spoken in secret… I am the Lord that speak justice, that declare right things” (Isaias 45: 18, 19). And in another place He says: “Wherefore hear the word of the Lord, ye scornful men, who rule over My people that is in Jerusalem. For you have said: We have entered into a league with death, and have made a covenant with Hell… for we have placed our hope in lies, and by falsehood we are protected. Therefore, thus saith the Lord God: Behold I will lay a stone in the foundation of Sion, a tried stone, a corner stone, a precious stone, founded in the foundation… And your league with death shall be abolished, and your covenant with Hell shall not stand…” (Ibid: 28: 14-18).

This was the faction that opposed Jesus Christ, whose doctrine was strictly Scriptural, as Jesus Christ indicated when He upbraided the Pharisees for breaking the Commandments of God for their esoteric tradition (Matt. 15: 3). Jesus Christ Himself declared: “In secret I have spoken nothing” (Jn. 18: 20). Another proof that esotericism is not of God but is of the Devil, is the fact that it tends to be accompanied by moral filthiness and perversion. “Sodom and Egypt, where there Lord was crucified” (Apoc. 11: 8). Everyone knows that Jesus Christ was crucified outside the walls of Jerusalem, however, God uses names to signify what a person or people are before Him. “By the envy of the Devil death came into the world, and they follow him that are of his side” (Wisdom 2: 24,25).

 Sacred Tradition is not esoteric, it protects and implements the Bible and it never contradicts it. Even the dogma of the Assumption of the ever-virgin Mother of Jesus, which is soley from Sacred Tradition, is in perfect harmony to the Bible, and it glorifies Christ, which is the sign of the Holy Spirit. Sacred Tradition is testimony from the Apostles and the Fathers of the Church, some of whom were contemporaries of the Apostles and communicated with them. It consists of precious information and traditions not recorded in the Bible but handed down from age to age. “Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle.” (2 Thess. 2: 14). The Bible came from the Church, not vice-versa! Sacred Tradition preceded the Bible. For three hundred years before the Bible was compiled, the Church relied on Sacred Tradition, and it retained its pristine integrity. A reading of the Saints and the classic sources recommended by the Saints, who are the “perfect”, and the real “elect”, which include Popes, Cardinals, Bishops, priests and lay people from the most humble to aristocratic backgrounds, consider the spiritual, as opposed to the carnal, to consist in being advanced in the way of prayer, in the absence of sin, vice and carnal attachments, and in the pursuit of asceticism and good works. The idea of an esoteric doctrine that diverges from what the Church preaches to the world, would be repugnant to the them, as the encyclicals of the Popes show, especially “Pascendi” by Pope Saint Pius X, which condemned esotericism. “The heart of a wise man is in his right hand, and the heart of a fool is in his left hand” (Ecclesiastes 10: 2). Esoteric doctrines are notoriously of the left. The new Vatican II Church may have an esoteric doctrine, but the Catholic Church of all ages, the one founded by Jesus Christ, called such a thing “heresy”, and taught that heresy excommunicates even a Pope.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is Celibacy to Blame for Child Sexual Abuse?  Modern media reported the child sexual abuse scandals ignoring the fact that the overwhelming majority of them involved men abusing boys. Their reports were so framed as to leave the impression that the sexual exploitation of minors is the result, not of homosexuality, but of vows of celibacy. It’s O.K to blame virgins, but not homosexuals! Men abusing boys is homosexuality. The contention that vows of celibacy are to blame is Anti-Catholicism. Pope Leo XIII in his “Review of Our Pontificate”, ahead, shows that child sex abuse was never a problem in the Church before it was infiltrated by Freemasonry and saturated with homosexuals for the purpose of creating scandals and sinners, to destroy it from within. Many well documented sources also testify to this, most notably ex-Communists Bella Dodd and Manly Johnson in their testimony before “The House Committee for Un-American Activities” in the 1950s, and in 2002 by Michael Rose in his book: “Good-Bye Good Men”. In the book he shows, amongst other things, how in the post Vatican II seminaries, Catholic men applying to the priesthood had to act gay to get in, Ch. 3, P. 75. A Catholic newspaper pointed out that after Vatican II the priesthood was so taken over and saturated with homosexuals that in many places the priesthood was beginning to be looked upon as a gay profession, like hairdressing. (The Remnant, P. 6: March 15, 2005). Homosexuality is as characteristic of the occult, as chastity is characteristic of the Divine.

The Catholic Church is against sin by its very Divine nature. A true Catholic is a servant of God, and is not a sinner or a heretic. When the Church was run by holy Catholics, as it should be, the following was the policy: “Should none then, but virgins be promoted to the priesthood? St. Bernard answers: ‘Long continuance in chastity is regarded as virginity’. Hence the holy Church guards nothing with so much jealousy as the purity of her priests. How many Councils and Canons enforce it? ‘Let no-one, says (Pope) Innocent III, be admitted to Holy Orders unless he be a virgin, or a man of approved chastity:’ and he ordained that ‘they who are in Holy Orders, if they lead not a chaste life, are to be excluded from every dignity’. (Pope) St. Gregory says: ‘No one should approach the ministry of the altar unless his chastity has been proved’… God ordained that priests who are habitually infected with eruptions on the skin, the symbols of impurity, should be cast off from the altar” (St. Alphonsus Liguori, Bishop and Doctor of the Church in “The Dignity and Duties of the Priest”, Instruction 3: P. 246 & 244, from Tan Books: 1-800-437-5876).

The contention that celibacy could be to blame for child sex abuse is contrary to nature and reason. Child sex abuse is a perversion. People who commit perversions tend to be oversexed people. Virgins who fall from their high moral state tend to do so for something normal like an irresistible member of the opposite gender their own age. A perversion would be too much too soon for the kind of person that would want to take a vow of celibacy in the first place. There are exceptions to every rule, but this is generally the case. The very suddenness and multitude of cases of child sex abuse in Catholic institutions corresponding to the antithetical and destructive changes that have come about in the Church since the 1960s shows that this is the result of a conspiracy. It is more efficient for those who want to destroy Catholicism to create scandals and falsely accuse people, than to resort to open and bloody persecution, like they did in the past!

Homosexual activist, Michael Swift wrote in “Gay Community News”, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A. Feb. 15, 1987:  “We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your vulgar dreams and shallow lives. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theaters, in your army bunk houses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of congress, wherever men are with men together. We will seduce them. Your sons will become your minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us.”
In Michael Rose’s book: “Goodbye Good Men”, the author describes the dominance by homosexuals of priestly formation, and how in the seminaries men of Catholic faith and morals have been raped, sexually abused, coerced or forced to accept homosexuality under threats of violence, aggravated harassment, or expulsion. The divulging of such things is kept under wraps by a carefully crafted policy of labeling disclosures as “inciting hate”, unless the media reports this activity in such a way as to defame and blame the Catholic priesthood and clerical celibacy, deliberately and maliciously covering up the real cause.

Three seminarians who fled a Vatican II seminary and obtained refuge in a Society of St. Pius X seminary, which so far has only admitted good Catholic men, that is, sinless and chaste men, and so it has had no sex scandals, so far, these seminarians who are now priests later wrote a book about their experience in the Vatican II seminary, said this about how true Catholics and sincere vocations are rooted out of Vatican II seminaries: “If a conservative or traditional Catholic seminarian enters a Post-Conciliar seminary, he must be very careful. For example, he must be a good actor, constantly pretending that he is not too pious or traditional, or that he does not believe in immutable truth, because for the entire time that he is at the seminary he is under the constantly watchful eye of the professors and his fellow seminarians. Depending on the particular seminary, he need only make one mistake and he will be out the door. Often this process of eliminating conservatives or traditionalists is also undertaken by bishops. For example, a former seminarian from St. Augustine’s Seminary in Toronto has informed the authors that as soon as he took office in 1978, Cardinal Carter ejected several seminarians from the seminary because they were critical of the seminary’s policy of open toleration of homosexuality. It is also interesting to note that while it is possible that a seminarian will be removed from the seminary if he is found to be conservative, he will definitely and automatically be expelled if he shows himself to be a traditionalist…” (Are Today’s Seminaries Catholic? Ch. 1: 3, P. 8,9, by Michael Depuis, Keith Roscoe, John Thomson, 1990). From Angelus Press. Imagine in the Catholic Church founded by Jesus Christ to uphold the Divine law and revelation, which teaches that homosexuality is so great a sin that it deserves the death penalty, that the bishops, whose job it is to be guardians and teachers of that Divine revelation and law, are implementing what flagrantly contradicts it, and expelling those who uphold it. This manifests infiltration and subversion. The servant always obeys his master. The master of the men responsible for such abuses is obviously not Jesus Christ, but rather their master is the master of all those whose master is not Jesus Christ! The master of such men can only be Luciferian Freemasons who run the whole New World Order including the Catholic Church since 1958. It was on the watch of such bishops that child molesters got covered up and moved from place to place. Some were child molesters themselves!

Celibacy Is Healthy: It is a dogma of the Catholic faith that sexuality is permitted only in a valid marriage between a man and a woman. Therefore, those who pertinaciously dissent from the Catholic faith on the Divine prohibition of homosexuality, adultery, contraception, abortion, fornication, and masturbation are guilty of mortal sin, and heresy. As shown elsewhere, heresy incurs “ispo facto” excommunication. To be heresy, it must be pertinacious. Someone who agrees with any of these things ignorantly in unbelief, yet would change their opinion if they knew that God forbade them, is not pertinacious, and therefore guilty of heresy.
Unlike food or sleep, sex is not necessary to the support of life. It is a healthy and wholesome thing to remain a virgin for life, or to live a celibate life as a result of widowhood, marriage breakdown, or of giving up ones sins. The people who disagree with this perennial Catholic doctrine will be those who, if they could be scrutinized, will be found to be people attached to vices and sins themselves. “Broad is the way that leads to destruction, and many there are that go in thereat. How narrow is the gate, and strait is the way that leads to life, and few there are that find it.” (Matt. 7: 13,14).
It is an adage among the corrupt: “use it or lose it”, they say. Because with human nature, the more you indulge, the more you need to indulge. Those who binge on food and alcohol, for example, are not the total abstainers or the moderate users, they are usually those long habituated to excess, who overdo dieting or who quit alcohol altogether without having a sufficiently resolute will to do so. However, as with giving up cigarettes, or if the alcoholic stays off alcohol long enough, they lose or greatly diminish the craving for it. So it is with celibacy. Someone who never had sex, does not have a sex drive. It takes an initial sexual encounter to open up the sexual instinct. The premature opening up of the sexual instinct by sexual abuse, is a proof to parents, police and social workers that the child either was or was not sexually abused. Sex education and pornography are also destroyers of childhood innocence, and dispose children to easily submit to the sexual solicitations of perverts. Voluntary celibacy leads away from moral disorders, while indulgence or a disposition to indulge leads to such things.

 Vows of celibacy are a serious commitment that must be of the candidates own free will and without imposture to be valid: fear, force, and fraud invalidate, according to Catholic dogma. The lifelong commitment to celibacy by sacred vows ought to be the result of long and mature deliberation and prayer, as Pope Pius XII said in his encyclical: “On Holy Virginity”:  “That each one study his own powers, whether he can fulfill the precepts of virginal modesty. For of itself, chastity is charming and attractive to all. But ones forces must be considered, that he who can may take it”.

The Holy Father also said in this encyclical:
“But recent attacks on this traditional doctrine of the Church, the danger they constitute, the harm they do to the souls of the faithful lead Us, in fulfillment of the duties of Our charge, to take up the matter once again in this encyclical letter, and to reprove these errors which are so often propounded under the specious appearance of truth. First of all, it is against common sense, which the Church always holds in esteem, to consider the sexual instinct as the most important and the deepest of human tendencies, and to conclude from this that man cannot restrain it for his whole life without danger to his vital nervous system, and consequently without injuring the harmony of his personality. As St. Thomas very rightly observes, the deepest natural instinct is the instinct for conservation; the sexual instinct comes second. In addition, it is for the rational inclination, which is the distinguishing privilege for our nature, to regulate these fundamental instincts and by dominating to enoble them. It is, alas, true that the sin of Adam has caused a deep disturbance in our corporal faculties and our passions, so that they wish to gain control of the life of the senses and even of the spirit, obscuring our reason and weakening our will. But Christ’s grace is given to us, especially by the sacraments, to help us to keep our bodies in subjection and to live by the spirit. The virtue of chastity does not mean that we are insensible to concupiscence, but that we subordinate it to reason and the law of grace, by striving wholeheartedly after what is noblest in human and Christian life. In order to acquire this perfect mastery of the spirit over the senses, it is not enough to refrain from acts directly contrary to chastity, but it is necessary to generously renounce anything that may offend this virtue nearly or remotely; at such a price will the soul be able to reign fully over the body and lead its spiritual life in peace and liberty. Who then does not see, in the light of Catholic principles, that perfect chastity and virginity, far from harming the normal unfolding of man or woman, on the contrary endow them with the highest moral nobility… For this reason the Church has most wisely held that the celibacy of her priests must be retained; she knows it is and will be a source of spiritual graces by which they will be evermore closely united with God.”

So-called “harmful repression” of the sexual instinct arises where an unwilling person, long habituated to excess, finds themselves forced to be celibate against their will. This would point to infiltration, because no-one is forced to be a priest, a nun or a monk, and if it doesn’t suit them. They are free to leave or be dismissed in the 7 or so years it takes to qualify for such vows. No-one who isn’t motivated by the love of God and holiness, and therefore, of chastity (celibacy) would want to be a priest or a nun in this day and age when Catholicism is unpopular and obscure, unless they are agents of worldly powers trying to get control of the Church. This is what is behind those who say they “feel called” to be a priest, but not to be celibate. A priestly vocation is a grace from God and a privilege. It is  not a right, and if God gives this grace, the thirst for celibacy is always one of the signs of a true vocation. If they do not have this sign, they can believe that they are not called by God to this state. “The sensual man perceives not these things that are of the spirit of God; for it is foolishness to him, and he cannot understand” (1 Cor. 2: 14). Chastity and Continence are fruits of the Holy Ghost, and the workings of the Holy Ghost in souls truly called to the Priesthood or a religious vocation, always shows these signs of His presence in their souls and the source their motive to a vocation. “Chastity is sanctity” said St. Hilary, Doctor of the Church (The Western Fathers, P. 261, by F. R. Hoare, from Sheed & Ward, 1954). And sanctity is the whole point of a vocation to the religious life, or to the priesthood. A function of sanctity or holiness is to set apart – to separate the holy from the profane. How can someone be set apart if they are coupled? The three functions of the priesthood, are “to teach, to govern, and to sanctify”, always for sanctity and sanctification, and never without it. The sensual are not holy and cannot sanctify. “A bottle can only give the kind of wine that it contains”! Indeed, the sensual are the source of the Churches problems with sinful members, especially sexual abuse, in Catholic institutions. “Marriage may be pardoned, virginity looks towards Heavenly glory, and fornication is destined to punishment unless it is purged by penance”, said Posthumanius the contemporary eye-witness of St. Martin of Tours quoting him (The Western Fathers, P. 116). Like the unchaste who clamor to become priests, people in sinful relationships sometimes say that God brought them together, so well matched do they feel themselves to be, but they are mistaken or lying. The sign that something is from God, is that it leads away from sin, never to it. “He that commits sin is of the Devil… whosoever is born of God, commiteth not sin: for His seed abides in him, and he cannot sin, because he is born of God. In this are the children of God manifest, and the children of the Devil.” (1 Jn. 3: 8-10).

For people who are well motivated and well disposed, who want to give up sin or any bad habit, or who want to pursue higher virtue, repression is a good thing. Another word for it is self control! In real life, a child or an adult that has every whim and appetite gratified, is a spoiled brat, or at any rate, neither pleasing to God or man. Whereas, people who are not used to having all they want, and even those who suffer  privation, tend to be better people. The rhetoric about “harmful repression” is libertine rethoric. A libertine is not so much an advocate of freedom, as of a freedom from the beneficial moral constraints of the law of God. As the homosexual activists show, there is no tyrant like a libertine! Sons of Belial the Bible calls such people. That name of a Devil means “without yoke” (Judges 19: 22), that is, without the light and easy yoke of the law of God. The generation of the sinner. To this class belong adulterers, homosexuals, child molesters and other sexual deviants. It is from such people that personal disorders and social problems spring. Opposed to libertines are those who love God and observe His law from the heart. Libertines sometimes play the part of a conservative for partisan expedients, but “light is very different from darkness.”  As Pope Leo XIII described in his Encyclical: “Humanum Genus”: speaking of the fact that the world is divided into only two separate and diverse camps, the Kingdom of Satan, on the one hand, and on the other hand, Catholicism, as founded by Jesus Christ, the Kingdom of God: “The one steadfastly contends for truth and virtue, the other for those things that are contrary to truth and virtue… contrary in their laws because striving for contrary objects.” 
Those who take such vows for the right reason, that is, for the love of God and of holiness, are almost always faithful to them. However, in vowed celibacy as in marriage, infidelities do occur.

Sex Education, A Facilitator Of Child Sexual Abuse: It is infiltrators who are the source of the sexual abuse of minors. Catholicism has a higher standard of morals, and is the least likely place to find child sexual abuse, therefore, why did they not do the same to other religions and institutions where moral standards are lower, and where the incidents of this crime would be higher? Simultaneous with the child sex abuse scandals were changes in every aspect of Church life that were antithetical to Catholicism and destructive of the substance of Catholicism which teaches that homosexuality and the sexual abuse of children are grave mortal sins. At the same time the sexual abuse came about, the Bishops, who were infiltrators risen up the ranks, and who allowed the Seminaries to fall into the hands of homosexuals who were for the most part Satanists, and who filled the Seminaries with them, keeping out good Catholic men who really had a vocation to the priesthood, also suppressed the childrens catechisms that taught chastity, resistance to sin to children, and the keeping of the Commandments – the 6th Commandment forbids sins of the flesh – and they replaced them with sex ed. condemned by the Church as “sexual initiation”, said a Decree of the Holy Office, March 21, 1931, and Pope Pius XI in “Divini Illius Magistri”. It stands to reason that a child who resists sin will resist a child molestor and warn others of the danger, whereas, a child that merely knows all about sex will not. Indeed, the evil of sexual abuse lies in that it destroys the innocence of the child. Sex ed. does the same thing. Knowledge of an evil leads to the commission of it. Sex is always an evil when it is used by those who are not married to each other, and in avoidance of offspring.

It is an observable fact that whores and other people with bad morals seek relaxed moral standards or no standard, while people with good morals seek conservative or high moral standards. Purity and impurity are mutually exclusive opposites. Those who oppose the high standards Catholic teaching proposes are usually sinners themselves, as the howling of the rabble outside the Church against vows of celibacy, no sex outside of Marriage, and no divorce or contraception taught by the Catholic Church for those seeking the way of God in truth, shows.

 “For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God.” (1 Cor. 3: 19). “Because the wisdom of the flesh is an enemy to God; for it is not subject to the law of God, neither can it be. And they who are in the flesh, cannot please God… but if by the Spirit you mortify the deeds of the flesh, you shall live. For whosoever are led by the Spirit of God, they are sons of God.” (Rom.8: 7-14). In the priesthood and the religious life, the sensual, the unbelievers and the sinful do not belong! It is due to such unworthy vocations that the child sex abuse scandals and all the other evils that have affected the Church have come about! It is an observable fact that when such types get in, they only let in their own kind, and they keep the true vocations out.

Before Vatican II the priesthood and the religious life were little amenable to child sexual abuse. Priests and nuns did not usually have the kind of familiarity or opportunities to be alone with children that are necessary to develop a situation of sexual abuse. In all I saw in the 5 convent schools I went to, and other convent schools I heard of from friends, there was no possibility that sexual improprieties could have occurred. When I heard of sexual abuse in the schools in the district where I went to school, I did not believe it (I was not “in denial”, or in disbelief, but I knew that it was an Anti-Catholic conspiracy), although it is probable that transgressions occurred in one boys school. However, at the root of the matter is the fact that Catholic institutions were infiltrated, and that these sex scandals are created, whether they are real cases caused by perverts who infiltrated the Church to molest Catholic children to turn them into sinners (Catholics who become involved with sins of impurity usually lose the faith. Those who are out to destroy the Church would want that), and to disgrace the Church and smear all Catholics, or false accusations made against innocent people motivated by sectarian hatred and animosity and by political imperialism.

The truth could only be obtained by a rigorous re-examination of all those cases by competent people not affiliated with Freemasonry or the Synagogue, or amenable to their blackmailing practices, and who take into consideration the methods employed by them, and their history of hatred and persecution of Catholics, using dirty tricks, fabrication, criminal acts, and human rights atrocities. So ubiquitous is Freemasonry, which subverts by stealth, that such a thing is hardly possible anymore, without it being merely a whitewashing exercise. The child sex abuse scandals provided a convenient smoke screen behind which to shut down and sell off Church property and institutions. Victims of violence and the families of murder victims do not get financial settlements from the institutions those perpetrators belonged to. I think that real sexual predators should get the death penalty for what they did, but leave Catholics their Churches. No Masonic or Synagogue property would be shut down or sold off to pay damages for the wrongs done to Catholics.

 “Top level intellectuals who advocate the establishment of a One World Government … pack the civil services of all remaining governments with homosexuals…” Professor Sorokin of Harvard University published a book called: “The American Sex Revolution. The author states that perverted sexual behavior plays a major part in modern U.S. political life and that sex bribery and blackmail are now as prevalent as monetary corruption.” (Satan, Prince Of This World, Ch. 8, P. 101,102, by William Guy Carr, Commander of the Royal Canadian Navy).  

The preferential treatment of homosexuals shown by government and present day authorities shows who’s in power.

“Libido Dominandi”, by Michael Jones: “explains how the rhetoric of sexual freedom was used to engineer a system of covert political and social control.” Fidelity Culture Wars.

“We have blackened the Catholic Church with the most ignominious calumnies… we have imputed to her the wrongs of her enemies, and have thus brought these latter to stand more closely by our side… We have turned her clergy into objects of hatred and ridicule, we have subjected them to the contempt of the crowd… We have induced some of our children to join the Catholic body, with the explicit intimation that they should work in a still more efficient way for the disintegration of the Catholic Church, by creating scandals within” (The Catholic Gazette, London, Feb. 1936 quoting speeches delivered at a… convention of B’nai B’rith).

In "Review Of His Pontificate", Pope Leo XIII stresses the Masonic agenda "has as its ultimate purpose, as its own statutes declare, the destruction of the Priesthood: It is to the inspiration and assistance of this sect that we must attribute in great measure the continual troubles with which the Church is harassed... without any cause proportionate to their effect; the uniformity of means... namely, the Press, public assemblies, theatrical productions; the employment in every country of the same arms, to wit, calumny and public uprisings, all this betrays an identity of purpose and a program drawn up by one and the same central direction... They are endeavoring by every means in their power first to restrict, then to completely exclude religious instruction from the schools so as to make the rising generation unbelievers or indifferent to all religion; as they are endeavoring in the daily Press to combat the morality of the Church, to ridicule it's practices and solemnities. It is only natural, consequently, that the Catholic priesthood, whose mission is to preach religion and to administer the sacraments, should be assailed with a special fierceness... It puts a malignant interpretation on all the acts of the clergy, bases suspicion upon the slenderest proofs and overwhelms it with the vilest accusations... and the confiscation of the Ecclesiastical patrimony which the pious generosity of the faithful had founded.
As regards religious orders and congregations, the practice of the Evangelical counsels made them the glory of society and the glory of religion. These very things rendered them more culpable in the eyes of the enemies of the Church and were the reasons why they were fiercely denounced and held up to contempt and hatred. It is a great grief for Us to recall here the odious measures which were so undeserved and so strongly condemned by all honest men by which the members of religious orders were lately overwhelmed. Nothing was of avail to save them, neither the integrity of their life, which their enemies were unable to assail, nor the right which authorizes all natural associations entered into for honorable purpose, nor the right of the constitutions which loudly proclaimed their freedom to enter into those organizations, nor the favor of the people who were so grateful for the precious services rendered in the arts, in the sciences, and in agriculture, and for the charity which poured itself out upon the most numerous and poorest of society. And hence it is, that these men and women who themselves had sprung from the people and had spontaneously renounced all the joys of family to consecrate to the good of their fellow men in those peaceful associations, their youth and their talent, their strength and their lives, were treated as malefactors as if they had formed criminal associations, and have been excluded from the common and perscriptive rights at the very time when men are speaking loudest of liberty... Judging by the consequences that have followed, this action was not only impolitic, but was an attack on society itself; for the assaults that are made upon religion are so many blows struck at the very heart of society. In making man a being destined to live in society, God in His providence also founded a Church, which, as the Holy Text expresses it, He has established Mount Sion in order that it might be a light which, with it's life-giving rays, would cause the principle of life to penetrate into the various degrees of human society by giving it Divinely inspired laws, by means of which society might establish itself in that order which would be most conducive to its welfare. Hence, in proportion as society separates itself from the Church, which is an important element in its strength, by so much does it decline, or its woes are multiplied for the reason that they are separated whom God wished to bind together ...
To accuse the Church of ambitious views is only to repeat the ancient calumny... which it's powerful enemies have more than once employed as a pretext to conceal their own purposes of oppression. Far from oppressing the State, history clearly shows... that the Church like its Divine founder has been, on the contrary, most commonly the victim of oppression and injustice. The reason is that its power rests, not on force of arms, but on the strength of thought and truth... The Church the usurper of the rights of the State! Why the Church knows and teaches that her Divine founder has commanded us to give to Caesar the things that are Caesar's and to God the things that are God's, and that He has sanctioned the immutable principle of an enduring distinction between those two powers which are both sovereign in their respective spheres... In its spirit of charity it is a stranger to every hostile design against the State. It aims only at making these powers go side by side for the advancement of the same object, namely, for man and human society, but by different ways and in conformity with the noble plan which has been assigned for its Divine mission. Would to God that its action were received without mistrust and suspicion..." (Pope Leo XIII, Apostolical Letter, March 19, 1902, Review Of His Pontificate) from "A Light In the Heavens" From Tan Books, Ph. 1-800-437-5876).

"A strict morality improves the quickness of man's intellectual powers, and if on the other hand, as the maxims of pagan philosophy and the admonitions of Divine wisdom combine to teach us, the keenness of the mind is blunted by bodily pleasures, how much more in the region of revealed truths do these same pleasures obscure the light of faith, or even, by the just judgment of God, entirely extinguish it. For these pleasures, at the present day, an insatiable appetite rages, infecting all classes with an infectious disease, even from tender years. Yet even for so terrible an evil there is a remedy at hand in the Divine Eucharist. For in the first place, it puts a check on lust by increasing charity, according to the words of St. Augustine, who says, speaking of charity: 'As it grows, lust diminishes; when it reaches perfection, lust is no more. Moreover, the most chaste flesh of Jesus keeps down the rebellion of our flesh, as St. Cyril of Alexandria taught, 'For Christ abiding in us lulls to sleep the law of the flesh which rages in our members. Then too, the special and most pleasant fruit of the Eucharist is that which is signified in the words of the Prophet: 'What is the good thing of Him', that is of Christ, and what is the beautiful thing, but the corn of the elect, and the wine that engenders virgins' (Zach. 9: 17)... by this same sacrament, our hope of everlasting blessedness, based on our trust in the Divine assistance, is wonderfully strengthened. For the edge of that longing for happiness which is so deeply rooted in the hearts of all men from their birth is whetted even more and more, by the deceitfulness of earthly goods, by the unjust violence of wicked men, and by all those other afflictions to which mind and body are subject" (Pope Leo XIII, "Mirae Caritatis": from: Papal Teachings on The Liturgy, P. 162-163, from The Daughters of St. Paul).

"The Revolution cannot tolerate the solitary man, the self-possessed man, the contemplative, the man who does not need to be forced to conform. The revolution incessantly repeats the word 'freedom'. What it means by this word, is that every man should free himself from the laws and self-preserving instincts of his own nature, that he should dispossess himself of all inner strength, restraint and virtue, to say nothing of the inner dominance of Christ by His truth and grace. The purpose of corrupting a person is to put him at the disposal of his fallen nature; the purpose of destroying his faith and of dispossessing him of all certainty, is that he will have to be controlled from without. The revolution means to unshackle a man interiorly, that it might have an excuse to encircle him with the mindless mob (which 'the community' is)... Despising virtue, which is man's mastery of himself by the power of Christ, even being unable to comprehend it. The revolution cannot conceive a community of truly free men, nor the idea of peace through the rule of the spirit of God." (Fr. J. Wathen, O.S.J. Ch. 4: H, P. 122, "The Great Sacrilege").

‘Let love be without dissimulation. Hating that which is evil, cleaving to that which is good.” (Rom. 12: 9).

St. Francis De Sales: Love & Hate:   "As love tends towards the good of the thing beloved, either by taking delight in it if he have it, or in desiring and procuring it if he have it not; so it produces hatred, by which it flies the evil that is contrary to the thing beloved, either by desiring or seeking to remove it if it be there, or by keeping it off and preventing it coming if it be not there. But if evil can neither be hindered from approaching, nor be removed, love at least fails not to have it hated and detested. When love therefore is fervent, and is come to that height that it would take away, remove and divert, what is opposite to the thing beloved, it is termed zeal... Zeal is no other thing than love in its ardor, or rather, the ardor that is in love... If the love be good, its zeal is good... Jealousy is a species of zeal... in some sort resembles envy, but in reality is very different from it. Envy makes us sorry that our neighbor enjoys a greater good than, or a like good with ourselves; although he is taking nothing from us that we have; and here envy is unreasonable... But jealousy is not grieved at our neighbor having some good provided that it is not our good: for the jealous man does not grieve at his fellows being beloved by other women, so long as he is not loved by the jealous man's wife... Jealousy never happens but in a matter of love, but envy is extended to all kinds of goods - honors, favors, beauty" (St. Francis DeSales, "On The Love of God", bk.10, ch. 12, p.442-3, Tan Books: 1-800-437-5876).

"What love, what care, and what jealousy a mother hen has for her chickens (for our Savior esteemed not this comparison unworthy of His Gospel). The hen... is a creature without any courage or nobility while she is not yet a mother, but with her mothership she puts on a lions heart: ever her head up, her eyes on guard, darting glances on every side to espy the smallest appearance of danger to her little ones. There is no enemy at whose eyes she will not fly in defense of her dear brood, for which she has a continual solicitude... What was the zeal of Job from the apprehension and fear he had that his children might have offended God? What was the zeal of St. Paul for his brethren according to the flesh, and for his children according to God... " (Ibid. ch. 14, p. 450).

"God wills us to have enemies, and it is also His will that we should repulse them. Let us then behave ourselves courageously between the one and the other will of God, enduring with patience to be assaulted, and endeavoring with courage by resistance to make head against and resist our assailants" (Ibid. bk. 9, ch.7, p. 385).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If the following documents were obsolete, I would not waste space quoting them. These quotes and what they address is immutable, and more relevant now that this wolf in sheep’s clothing has world power.

Pope Leo XIII said that Freemasonry is “The Kingdom of Satan” (“On Freemasonry”). And they do, in fact, worship the Devil in the higher degrees. Which proves that the Devil and Hell are not simply inventions of the Church to scare people!
In another encyclical he said that Socialism and Communism were a product of Freemasonry “As soon as secret societies began to take extension… the Roman Pontiffs Clement XV and Benedict XIV failed not to unmask the impious designs of the sectaries, and to warn the faithful throughout the world of the mischief’s they were hatching in secret…Our glorious predecessor, Pius IX, of happy memory, by allocutions alike and encyclical letters addressed to the bishops of the whole world, levied war against the iniquitous endeavors of these sects, and furthermore even denounced by name the plague of Socialism”. (Pope Leo XIII in his encyclical “Quod Apostolici Muneris”).
The Communist State in Russia was called: “The Union of Soviet and Socialist Republics”: The U.S.S.R., until the name Russia was restored recently. Communist politicians used the words Socialist, Communist, and Humanist interchangeably to describe themselves and their worldview.

Pope Leo XII said that Masonic oaths, being ordered to an evil and sinful purpose, do not bind (Quo Graviora). Just think about it! How could one be bound before God to serve His enemies and to sin?

Pope Pius XI said: “Its champions openly boast to destroy Christian civilization and the Christian religion by banishing every remembrance of them from the hearts of men, especially the young. Bishops and priests were exiled, condemned to forced labor, shot and done to death in inhuman fashion; laymen suspected of defending their religion were vexed, persecuted, dragged off to trial and thrown into prison… A third factor in the diffusion of Communism (“Communism” is the war party of Freemasonry, as the above quoted encyclical of Pope Leo XIII shows. It has not gone away, it has only adapted itself to current conditions and to the “needs” of “the Craft” –ed.) is the conspiracy of silence on the part of a large section of the non-Catholic Press of the world. We say conspiracy, because it is impossible to otherwise explain how a press usually so eager to exploit even the little daily incidents of this life has been able to remain silent for so long about the horrors perpetrated in Russia, in Mexico and even in a great part of Spain; and that it should have relatively so little to say concerning a world organization as vast…”. (Atheistic Communism”, 19, by Pope Pius XI, 1937). In Spain, the Holy Father continues, after lamenting similar events in other countries: “Every church and every monastery was destroyed. Every vestige of the Christian religion was eradicated, even though linked with the rarest monuments of art and science! The fury of communism has not confined itself to the indiscriminate slaughter of bishops, of thousands of priests and religious of both sexes… but the majority of its victims have been laymen… masses of them are slain almost daily for no other offence than the fact that they are good Christians or at least opposed to atheistic communism. And this fearful destruction has been carried out with a hatred and savage barbarity one would not have believed possible in our age… Nor can it be said that these atrocities are a transitory phenomenon, the usual accompaniment of all great revolutions…” (Ibid. 19-21).

Pope Pius XII: "In July 1949, His Holiness Pope Pius XII approved a Decree from The Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office which declared that Catholics who profess, and particularly those who defend and spread the materialist and anti-Christian doctrine of the Communists "ispo facto" as apostates from the Catholic Faith who incur excommunication specially reserved to the Holy See" ("Selection of Letters and Addresses of Pope Pius XII", imprimatured 1958, arranged by Maurice Quinlan).

Another of the many proofs that Communism and Socialism are from Freemasonry, is the book: “Grand Orient Freemasonry, The Hidden Power Behind Communism”, by Msgr. Dhillon. This book was so highly thought of, by Pope Leo XIII that he had it published and distributed at his own expense. It is available from: Omni CBC Publications: (661) 274-2240.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
H      Freemasonry Unveiled:     “For thus the Lord said to me: As He hath taught me, with a strong arm, that I should not walk in the way of this people, saying: Say ye not: A conspiracy: for all that this people speaks is a conspiracy:  neither fear ye their fear, nor be afraid. Sanctify the Lord of Hosts Himself: and let Him be your fear, and let Him be your dread. And He shall be a sanctification to you. But for a stone of stumbling and a rock of offence to the two houses of Israel, for a snare and a ruin to the inhabitants of Jerusalem” (Isaias 8: 11-14).

-    30th Degree, Knight Kadosh of The Scottish Rite. The 19th Degree of the same rite says: “War on the Cross of Jesus Christ! Adopt the cult of Lucifer, of fire, and of flesh”. (The Mystery Of Freemasonry Unveiled, “Furious Hatred Toward Christ”, P. 73: 47: by Cardinal Caro of Chile, 1957. From The Fatima Crusader: 1-800-263-8160). 

-   “ They have a formula that sums up their state of mind… Glory and love to Lucifer. Hatred, hatred, hatred, hatred to God be damnation …’. It is confessed in these societies that everything the Christian God ordains is disagreeable to Lucifer; that, on the contrary, everything He forbids (lying, stealing, abuse, murder, promiscuity, fraud and injustice –ed.), is agreeable to Lucifer, and consequently it is necessary to do all the Christian God forbids and guard against everything He ordains as if it were fire. I repeat, that I have held the proof of all this in my hands… also that murder is practiced there… Margiotta relates that Albert Pike had decreed that the God of Masonry ought to be given only the … name Lucifer, while Lemmi, a rabid Satanist, wanted the God of the most secret Lodges to be invoked and evoked only under the name of Satan” (Ibid. P. 105: 67 : “Satanic Societies”).

-    Emblem on Masonic certificates: A spilled chalice, other emblems include the upside down Cross (a prominent emblem of Satanism), and The Sacred Heart of Jesus with the motto  “Cor excecrandum”, which means hated, abominable and accursed heart. (Ibid. P. 98: 62: “Anti-Catholic Fury”).
     “The well-known passage which occurs in two different letters… the Pope (Pope Pius IX) signalizes Freemasonry as “the Synagogue of Satan” (Apoc. 2: 9), whose object is to blot out the Church of Christ, were it possible, from the face of the earth… the meeting together of all the uprisings of man against God… mobilization of all powers of evil against those of good” (Freemasonry and the Anti-Christian Movement, Ch. 3: P. 54 & Ch.6: 125: “Papal Condemnations”, By Fr. J. Cahill, S.J. Professor of History and Social Science. Imprimatur Archbishop of Dublin, Ireland, 1930). Available from Omni CBC Books: (661) 274-2240.

         “Our ultimate end is that of Voltaire and the French Revolution – the final destruction of Catholicism, and even of the Christian idea”... From documents seized from a Masonic Lodge by Roman authorities and “communicated  by Pope Gregory XVI to author Cretineau Joly who published them in his book: ‘L’Eglise en face  de la Revolution”, with the approval of Pope Pius IX”. (Ibid., P. 101, Ch. 5: Masonic Documents).

 Many members of Freemasonry know it only as an organization that is benevolent and good for business. This is because there is an exoteric Freemasonry, which presents a “tolerant” and respectful of human rights face to the world, and an esoteric Freemasonry, a secret society within a secret society, which is occult and Antichristian, and which deliberately misleads its own members. As Albert Pike, the foremost writer of Freemasonry said: “Masonry… conceals its secrets from all except the Adepts and Sages, or the Elect, and uses false explanations and misinterpretations of its symbols to mislead those who deserve only to be misled; to conceal the truth, which it calls light, from them ands to draw them away from it… The Blue Degrees are the outer portico of the Temple. Part of the symbols are displayed there to the initiate, but he is intentionally misled by false interpretations. It is not intended that he shall understands them, but it is intended that he shall imagine he understands them. Their true explication is reserved for the Adepts, the Princes of Masonry” (Morals and Dogma, P. 104, 819, by Albert Pike quoted by Ralph Epperson in “Masonry, Conspiracy Against Christianity”, Ch. 5: “Review of Morals & Dogma”, P. 77, 78).

It will be argued that Freemasonry has undergone changes since the days of Albert Pike, and that his text: Morals & Dogma, is no longer given to members of the Scottish Rite of the 17th  degrees. But those changes are only cosmetic and utilitarian, not substantial.

Masonic adept, Manley P. Hall, who died in 1991, described as one of the foremost Masonic authors in the world, said: “Freemasonry is a fraternity within a fraternity… an outer organization concealing an inner brotherhood of the elect… it is necessary to establish the existence these two separate yet interdependent orders, the one visible and the other invisible. The visible society is a splendid camaraderie of ‘free and accepted’ men enjoined to devote themselves to ethical, educational, fraternal, patriotic, and humanitarian concerns. The invisible society is a secret and most august fraternity whose members are dedicated to the service of a mysterious arcanum arcandrum… Those brethren who have essayed to write the history of their craft have not included in their disquisitions… the story of that truly secret inner society which is to the body Freemasonic what the heart is to the body human. In each generation only a few are accepted into the inner sanctuary of the work.” (Lectures On Ancient Philosophy, P. 433, by Manley P. Hall, quoted by Ralph Epperson in “The New World Order”, Ch. 19, P. 152).

“…The grand object of this conspiracy was to overturn every altar where Christ was adored. It was the conspiracy of the Sophisters if Impiety, or the ANTICHRISTIAN CONSPIRACY. This school of impiety soon formed the Sophisters of Rebellion: these latter, combining their conspiracy against kings with that of the Sophisters of Impiety, coalesce with that ancient sect whose tenets constituted the whole secret of the Occult Lodges of Free-masonry, which long since, imposing on the credulity of its most distinguished adepts, only initiated the chosen of the elect into the secret of their unrelenting hatred for Christ and kings.” (Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism, P. 6, by Abbe  Barruel, 1798), available from Omni CBC Publications.

Letter of Instruction sent by Albert Pike speaking as sovereign pontiff of Freemasonry addressed to the heads of 26 Councils of his New and Reformed Palladian Rite, the super-rite having power over all Masonry: “That which we must say to the crowd is, ‘We worship God’ – but it is the God one worships without superstition… The Masonic religion should be, by all of us initiates in the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian doctrine… Yes, Lucifer is God. And unfortunately Adonai is also God. For the eternal law is that there is no light without shade; no beauty without ugliness; no white without black… Thus the doctrine of Satanism is a heresy, and the true and pure philosophical religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Adonai. But Lucifer, god of light and god of good, is struggling for humanity against Adonai, the God of darkness and evil.” (“Satan, Prince of This World”, Ch. 3, P. 47, by William Guy Carr, Commander of the Royal Canadian Navy, died 1958). From Omni Publications.

The leftist and Antichristian orientation of the modern world is a manifestation of the Masonic spirit, and of the dominance of Freemasonry.

Perhaps some will say: I can still be a regular Freemason and steer clear of all that sinister baggage. No, you can’t! When you were received as an entered apprentice, you were asked in the ritual: “What do you seek?” And your reply according to the form of the ritual was: “light”. This is what Albert Pike said the “light” is, on page 321 of his book “Morals And Dogma”: “Lucifer, the light-bearer! Lucifer the son of the morning! Is it he who bears the light…? Doubt it not!” (quoted by Ralph Epperson in “The New World Order”, Ch. 11, P. 83).

The Adonaicide Mass: “Moses Mendelssohn’s ritual for the higher degrees of Grand Orient Masons was known as ‘The Black Mass.’ Its words and ceremonies expressed bitter hatred of Christ and Christianity. Pike suggested to Moses Holbrook that it would be a good idea if they revised and modernized the ceremony of ‘The Black Mass,’ so that it didn’t appear so Talmudic… He called the new ceremonial ‘The Adonaicide Mass,’ which means the death of God… Pikes New and Reformed Palladian Rite, and on P. 456, Vol. 1 of his book, La France Maconnerie he says, ‘In the reception of the Elect of the Reformed Palladian Rite, those who are to be initiated are to be taught to punish the traitor Jesus Christ and to kill Adonai, the God of the Bible, through the power of their own evil, done first by the Master, and then by the initiate, piercing the Host with a dagger, in the midst of horrible blasphemies, after they have been assured that it is a consecrated Host…” On P. 81, Ch. 6 of this book he says: “During every Adonaicide Mass a victim is sacrificed… The victim can be human, fowl or animal according to the circumstances and risk involved… Rosecrucianism was closely associated with these ritualistic murders of male and female youths” (Satan, Prince of This World, Ch. 11, P. 128, 129, by William Guy Carr, Commander of the Royal Canadian Navy, died 1958). These rites also involve filthy and disgusting practices such as orgies and beastiality and the consumption of these desecrated Hosts dipped in menstrual blood. Aleister Crowley, founder of the O.T.O. “sacrificed a male goat while it copulated with his consort, Leah Hirsig. Crowley slit its throat, and Hirsig’s back was spattered with its blood”. All this and more on P. 21, Ch. 2, in “Blood On The Altar”, by Craig Heimbichner. An O.T.O website I googled had a picture representing beastiality on its “Images” window.  

  "Let us remember that Christianism and Freemasonry are essentially incompatible... to become united with one means being divorced from the other..." (Pope Leo XIII, Letter to the Italian People, from "Papacy and Freemasonry", P. 4, by Msgr. Jouin, with direct approbation of two Popes). From Omni Publications.

“Catholics! What must we consider Freemasonry, when Freemasons themselves pronounce it apostasy from Catholicity…” (Occult Theocracy, P. 431, Ch. 65: Carbonarism, by Lady Queenborough). Omni Publications.

Oath of 1st Degree Entered Apprentice:
“I, (name) of my own free will and accord, in presence of Almighty God and this worshipful lodge of free and accepted Masons, dedicated to God, and held forth to the holy order of St. John, do hereby and hereon most solemnly and sincerely promise and swear that I will always hail, ever conceal and never reveal any part or parts, art or arts, point or points of the secret arts and mysteries of ancient Freemasonry…”

7th Degree Royal Arch: “ I furthermore promise and swear, that I will assist a Companion Royal Arch Mason when I see him engaged in any difficulty, and will espouse his cause so far as to extricate him from the same, whether he be in the right or in the wrong. I furthermore promise and swear, that I will keep all the secrets of a Companion Royal Arch Mason, delivered to me in charge as such, shall remain as secure and inviolable in my breast, as they were in his own before communicated to me, murder and treason excepted, and those left to my election…” (Unholy Alliances, Ch. 5, P. 101,105, by Dr. James Wardner), from Omni Publications.
Imagine these oaths in the case of judges, police, politicians, supervisors, or bishops. Now it’s not hard to understand how Masonic Bishops “extricated” brother Mason child molester priests from trouble and sent them elsewhere to repeat their offences.

Pope Leo XIII “Moreover, to be enrolled, it is necessary that the candidates promise and undertake to be thenceforward strictly obedient to their leaders and masters with the utmost submission and fidelity, and to be in readiness to do their bidding upon the slightest expression of their will; or, if disobedient, to submit to the direst penalties and death itself. As a fact, if any are judged to have betrayed the doings of the sect or to have resisted commands given, punishment is inflicted on them not infrequently, and with so much audacity and dexterity that the assassin very often escapes the detection and penalty of his crime.
But to simulate and wish to lie hid; and to bind men like slaves in the very tightest bonds, and without giving any sufficient reason; to make use of men enslaved to the will of another for any arbitrary act; to arm men’s right hands for bloodshed after securing impunity for the crime – all this is an enormity from which nature recoils. Wherefore reason and truth itself make it plain that the society of which we are speaking is in antagonism with justice and natural uprightness”. (Pope Leo XIII in “On Freemasonry”, 9,10). Freemasonry already had such power in the State and in the police to do what this Pope describes in the 1880s, what must it be now that they have complete power?

“The Mason is taught in their book called Morals and Dogma that there are no truths in any morality, and if that is true, the Mason is free to determine his particular morality for himself depending on the situation. This moral code of the Masons is called ‘Situation Ethics’… Mr. Pike further defined their position… He states that the Mason: ‘is not confined to set forms of thought, of action, of feeling. He accepts what his mind regards as true, what his conscience decides is right… all else he puts far from him’… But just as explained, the ‘first layer’ Mason is taught that there are no ‘Moral Absolutes’. They have been, and are being taught that each man is to make his own decisions as to what is right and wrong. And that is the reason that the Masons used to ask him to read the Masonic book entitled Morals and Dogma” (Masonry, Conspiracy Against Christianity, Ch. 9, P. 93, 94 & Ch. 10, P. 108, by Ralph Epperson, Publius Press: (520) 886-4380).
The Book “Morals And Dogma” is virtually the code of Freemasonry, and Albert Pike is one of the Fathers and perhaps the greatest authority in Freemasonry.

Masonic Tolerance:  Masonry speaks much of tolerance, and reproaches good Catholics for “fanaticism” when they stand up for their faith and their principles. But none are more intolerant and tyrannical than they. For example, some time ago, when the news incorrectly reported that a Catholic school had fired a teacher for being openly homosexual, as they ought to do, to uphold Catholic principles which teach that homosexuality is gravely sinful, as well as to protect the young from bad example, and possibly sexual abuse or seduction. Bus drivers, who are members of Masonic unions, refused to pick up school children wearing that schools uniform, leaving the children stranded and unable to get home after school. They did that because Catholics in their own institution upheld Catholic teaching and the law of God, and thus, were not conforming to Masonic dogma, which they seek to impose on Catholics in their institution as well as the world! Such incidents are not isolated, but are rather manifestations of a prevailing spirit. Catholics do not impose Catholic teaching on those who are not Catholic, nor even on Catholic’s themselves, as all the divorced and remarried Catholics show. People like myself observe the law of God and the Catholic faith motivated by the fear and love of God. Not from human coercion. Imagine what would happen if Catholic bus drivers did the same thing to uphold Catholic teaching? After all, it is Catholicism that is right! And Masonic ideas that are wrong! The Catholic Church does not call Catholics to account and administer penalties for breaches of the Divine law, as Freemasonry penalizes its members for contravening Masonic interests. It is reasonable and necessary that employees of the Church or Catholic institutions be good Catholics who love the Church, and that public sinners, or those who dissent from her teaching, which are heretics, should be deemed unfit for such employments. If this policy was adhered to, the child sex abuse scandals would not have happened. Such things only happen when sinners and the faithless are admitted to positions of trust in Catholic institutions. The psychotic fanaticism with which these Masons impose on others, and call them what they themselves are, if they dare to defend themselves and stand up for their principles!  

The “Intolerance” of Catholicism is based on the fact that Catholicism claims to be the true religion, and that it should be the basis of the social order, and the laws of the land. Truth is by its nature intolerant of lies and error. But even this is not sufficient to explain the violence and enduring paroxysm of hatred that animates esoteric Freemasonry against Catholicism. The real cause of this pathological hatred, is supernatural – the spirit of Satan striving against the spirit of God.
Catholicism stakes its claims through persuasion, not through violence. Nations became Catholic when saintly monks and bishops preached the Gospel to that nation, establishing schools, churches, monasteries and charitable institutions to look after people. This is where public education, universities, the arts, hotels, hospitals, and social services began. “Their achievements, indeed, were after the pattern of the Apostles themselves; they ruled through consciences, taught through letters and worked miracles through their holiness. Preached by such men, the truth had full course, so that whole regions passed quickly over to their side.” (The Western Fathers: The Life of St. Germanus, written by Constantius, a priest and a contemporary of his, c. 480, P. 297, from Sheed & Ward Publishers, 1954).
Antichristians are forever harping on “the Crusades” and “the Inquisition”, which, apart from being brief episodes that occurred late in a history of 2000 years of peace, piety, learning and excellent craftsmanship, were called forth by the need to defend Christians from an even more voracious enemy than Masonic historians falsely depict Christianity to be. The Crusades were called to protect Catholics making pilgrimages to Jerusalem, and to protect the holy sites there. The Inquisition was a most just tribunal of enquiry, which the infiltration of the Church and its subversion even then, as well as the usuries and often violent oppressions of Catholics by the perennial enemies of Jesus Christ, gave rise to. “History clearly shows when it is read without prejudice, that the Church like its Divine founder has been, on the contrary, most commonly the victim of oppression and injustice. The reason is that its power rests not on force of arms but on the strength of thought and truth.” (Pope Leo XIII in “Review of His Pontificate”, in “A Light In The Heavens”, from Tan Books).

Freemasonry came to power through rivers of innocent blood, through profound corruption instigated by them and kept under wraps by Masonic secrecy and blood oaths.

Nothing To Apologize For: “The Church, which has never betrayed the happiness of the people by consenting to dubious alliances, does not have to free herself from the past… Indeed, the true friends of the people are neither revolutionaries, nor innovators, they are the promoters of tradition” (Pope (now Saint) Pius X, in “Our Apostolic Mandate, 44).
“But the enemies of the Church, though forced to acknowledge the wisdom of her doctrine, accuse her of having failed to act in conformity with her principles, and from this conclude the necessity of seeking other solutions. The utter falseness and injustice of this accusation is shown by the whole history of Christianity.” (Pope Pius XI, Atheistic Communism, 36. Both from Angelus Press, also in “The Popes Against Modern Errors”, from Tan Books).

Voltaire, one of the fathers of Freemasonry said: “It is necessary to lie, not timidly and sometimes, but like the very Devil, boldly and always”. (“Satan, Prince of This World”, P. 80, Ch. 6, By William Guy-Carr, Commander of the Royal Canadian Navy, from Omni Publications).


   Who Can Find Fault With Democracy? 

“Karl Marx, who had founded there the secret organization called: The Communist League of Workers”, which was eventually brought out into the open under the name of “The International Society of Democracy”. (The Occult Theocrasy, Ch. 62: The Rite of Mizraim, P. 414, by Lady Queenborough).

“As against this, says Pope Leo XIII comparing Christian Democracy to Socialist Democracy, which characterizes The New World Order: “Christian Democracy, by the fact that it is Christian, is built, and necessarily so, on the basic principles of Divine faith, and it must provide better conditions for the masses, with the ulterior object of promoting the perfection of souls made for things eternal. Hence, for Christian Democracy, justice is sacred; it must maintain that the right of acquiring and possessing property cannot be impugned, and it must safeguard the various distinctions and degrees which are indispensible in every well-ordered commonwealth. Finally, it must endeavor to preserve in every human society the form and character which God ever impresses on it. It is clear, therefore, that there is nothing in common between Social and Christian Democracy. They differ from each other as much as the sect of Socialism differs from the profession of Christianity” (Pope Leo XIII in “On Christian Democracy, in “The Popes Against Modern Errors”, from Tan Books).

“Thou shalt not receive the voice of a lie: neither shalt thou join thy hand to bear false witness for a wicked person. Thou shalt not follow the multitude to do evil: neither shalt thou yield in judgment, to the opinion of the most part, to stray from the truth” (Exodus 23: 1,2).

Modern Politics: “The game of politics is the pursuit of power. In all democracies, there are two separate organizations playing the political game. The open and visible one, the members of which hold office as members of a government, and the invisible one composed of individuals who control this visible organization and in whom is vested the real power, the essence of which is finance, controlling the publicity which makes or unmakes its tools. This financial power may be used to promote truth or fallacies, good or evil, national prosperity or national ruin, but so long as human nature is what it is, so long as jealousy, greed, personal ambition and expediency can sway the lives of men, so long will the rule of the invisible power prevail by methods inimical to the best interests of a nation. The strength of democracy thus lies at the mercy of invisible leaders who, being nationally irresponsible, cannot be called to account for the consequences of the acts of the governments they control. This at the same time constitutes the inherent weakness of any form of government, the apotheosis of which is the control of both parties in the State, right and left, radical and conservative, by the same forces. Then only the puppets change while the rule of the individuals controlling the machine continues unhindered. Voters who wonder why their efforts have failed, wonder in vain. As dupes of a controlled publicity their privilege of a vote is a farce.” (The Occult Theocrasy, Ch. 31: “Practical Politics”, P. 241, by Lady Queenborough).

“The Communist International and Soviet Russia stand today as monuments to the Masonic ideal of Albert Pike symbolized by the three (points symbol Freemasons use): Destruction: Its organization of terror. Materialism: Its assault on religion. Imposition: Its Communist State.” (Ibid. Ch. 125: “The Third International”, P. 618).

The United Nations was set up on land donated by the Rockefellers as a front for the elite's Luciferian dictatorship. Its Charter was based on the Constitution of Soviet Russia and its leaders were Communists. It's Chapel is dedicated to paganism and run by the Lucis Trust (formerly Lucifer Trust) which also handles all its publications. Website: “Makow – Is The Pope Catholic?”

Pope St. Pius X: “By separating fraternity from Christian charity thus understood, Democracy, far from being progress, would mean a disastrous step backward for civilization. If, as we desire with all Our heart, the highest possible peak of well-being for society and its members is to be attained through fraternity, or, as it is also called, universal solidarity, all minds must be united in the knowledge of Truth, all wills united in morality and all hearts in the love of God and His Son Jesus Christ. But this union is attainable only by Catholic charity, and that is why Catholic charity alone can lead people in the march of progress towards the ideal civilization”. (Pope Pius (now Saint) X, in “Our Apostolic Mandate”, 24, in “The Popes Against Modern Errors”).

________________________________________________________________________________
St. Gregory Nazianzan; 360 A.D. wrote at the time of the Arian heresy, a time not unlike our own: "Surely the pastors have done foolishly; for excepting very few, who, on account of their insignificance were passed over, or who by reason of their virtue resisted, and who were left as a seed and root for the springing up again of Israel (the Church - ed.) by the influence of the Spirit, all temporized, only differing from each other in this, that some succumbed earlier, and others later; some were foremost champions and leaders in the impiety, and others joined the second rank of the battle, being overcome by fear, or by interests, or by flattery, or, what was most excusable, by their own ignorance".

Pope Pius II, 1458-64, in his Papal Bull “Execrabilis” stated that any Council called to make drastic change in the Church is beforehand decreed to be void and annulled!

    St. Francis DeSales on: A True Church Council  "One could not better trace out a true and holy council than on the pattern of that which the Apostles held at Jerusalem... The Apostles and ancients came together to consider the matter. And in truth it is the pastors who are charged to instruct the people and to provide for their salvation by resolving the doubts which arise touching Christian doctrine... For what are the principal causes why General Councils are assembled, save to put down and cast out the heretic, the schismatic, the scandalizer, as wolves from the sheepfold" (St. Francis De Sales, "The Catholic Controversy, Art.4: "The Qualities of A True Council", p.217, Tan Books.  

The fact alone that this Doctor of the Church qualifies a Council as "a true and holy Council" implies that there are such things as false Council's not received by the Catholic magisterium, such as the false Council's of Rimini and Tiro. The sacred magisterium is the constant teaching authority of the Church. It is not merely a Pope or two, or three, or a Council. It is what the Church has always taught. "But all this is to be understood of true Councils", says the St. Francis, he continues: "There is nothing so certain but that it can meet with opposition, but truth remains firm and is glorified by the assaults of what is contrary to it... And those prophets were not legitimate or acknowledged as such ... when he said: 'Is there here not some prophet of the Lord that we may inquire of him? -as if he would say that the others were not prophets of the Lord" (Ibid. P. 232, 234), he said, referring to "the assembly of priests against Our Lord" (Ibid.). "The testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy" (Apoc. 19: 10).

Before God and Catholic dogma, only the bishops who are not heretics have any authority in a Church Council: "Giving Commandments by The Holy Ghost to the Apostles whom He had chosen... But you shall receive the power of The Holy Ghost coming upon you, and you shall be witnesses unto Me in Jerusalem, and in all Judea... and even to the uttermost parts of the earth" (Acts 1: 2-5, 8). "That penance and the remission of sins should be preached in His name, unto all nations, beginning at Jerusalem" (Lk. 24: 47). The "Periti" (so-called experts) who took over at Vatican II, were often priests or laypeople with no authority, and largely anti-Catholic moles.

"For the Holy Spirit was not promised to the successors of Peter, that by His revelation they might make known new doctrine, but that by His assistance they might inviolably keep and faithfully expound the revelation or deposit of faith delivered through the Apostles" (Concerning the Infallible Teaching of the Roman Pontiff, Vatican Council, July 18, 1870, from "Dogmatic Canons and Decrees" from Tan Books).
         
Deliberations at the Vatican Council 1870 prior to the Decree defining Papal infallibility and declaring it a dogma of the Catholic faith: "The question was also raised by a Cardinal: 'What is to be done with a Pope if he becomes a heretic?' It was answered that there has never been such a case; "the Council of Bishops could depose him for heresy, for from the moment he becomes a heretic he is not the head, or even a member of the Church. The Church would not be, for a moment, obliged to listen to him when he begins to teach a doctrine the Church knows to be a false doctrine, and he would cease to be Pope being deposed by God Himself... His Grace said in conclusion: 'The Bishops were, many of them, afraid that outside influences could be brought to bear on the Church, ... wherever will you find in history anything to compare with the freedom from vice, error, crime, and disorder such as you will find in the conduct of the Catholic Church by the Pope whom God has now placed over her? ("Life of Pope Pius IX", Ch. 19, P. 185, by Rev. R. Brennan, A.M., 12 Imprimaturs (Ecclesiastical approval), Benziger Bros. 1878, Publishers to the Holy See).

 Papal Infallibility: What St. Francis DeSales, Bishop, Doctor of the Church, wrote in the 1500s about Papal infallibility, only defined at The Vatican Council in 1870, shows that when the Church defines a dogma, that she is not introducing something new, but specifying exactly what God revealed about the matter.

"Under the ancient law the High Priest did not wear the Rational except when he was vested in the Pontifical robes and was entering before the Lord. Thus we do not say that the Pope cannot err in his private opinions, as did John XXII; or be altogether a heretic, as perhaps Honorius was. Now when he is explicitly a heretic, he falls 'ispo facto' from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church must either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See, and must say, as St. Peter did: 'Let another take his bishopric' (Acts I, quoting Psalm 108). When he errs in his private opinion he must be instructed, advised, convinced; as happened to John XXII, who was so far from dying obstinate or from determining anything during his life concerning his opinion, that he died while making the examination which is necessary for determining in a matter of faith, as his successor declared in the 'Extravagantes' which begins 'Benedictus Deus’. But when he is clothed with the pontifical garments, I mean when he teaches the whole Church as Shepherd, in general matters of faith and morals, then there is nothing but doctrine and truth. And in fact, everything a King says is not a law or an edict, but that only which the King says as King and legislator. So everything the Pope says is not canon law or of legal obligation; he must mean to define and to lay down the law for the sheep, and he must keep the due order and form. Thus we say that we must appeal to him, not as to a learned man, for he is ordinarily surpassed by some others, but as to the general head and pastor of the Church: and as such, we must honor, follow, and firmly embrace his doctrine, for then he carries on his breast the Urim and Thummim, doctrine and truth. And again, we must not think that in everything and everywhere his judgment is infallible, but then only when he gives judgment on a matter of faith in questions necessary to the whole Church; for in particular cases, which depend on human fact he can err... Theologians have said, in a word, that he can err in questions of fact, not in questions of right; that he can err 'extra cathedram', outside the chair of Peter, that is, as a private individual, by writings and bad example. But he cannot err when he is in cathedra, that is, when he intends to make an instruction and decree for the guidance of the whole Church, when he needs to confirm his brethren as the supreme pastor, and conduct them to the pastures of faith. For then it is not so much man who determines, resolves, and defines, as it is the Blessed Holy Spirit by man, which Spirit, according to the promise made by Our Lord to the Apostles, teaches all truth to the Church... Our God wills to lead not only the lambs and little sheep, but the sheep and mothers of lambs. That is, not the people only but also the other pastors: he succeeds St. Peter, who received this charge: 'feed My sheep. Thus it is that God leads His Church into the pastures of His Holy Word, and in the exposition of this, he who seeks the truth under other leading loses it.  The Holy Spirit is the leader of the Church, He leads it by it's pastor; he therefore, who follows not the pastor follows not the Holy Spirit" (St. Francis De Sales, Bp., Dr. of the Church, "The Catholic Controversy", P. 305-308, Ch. 14: Art. 6. From Tan Books, Call: 1-800-437-5876).

"We teach and define that it is a Dogma Divinely revealed: that the Roman Pontiff, when he speaks "ex cathedra", that is, in the discharge of his office of pastor and teacher of all Christians, by virtue of his supreme and Apostolic authority, he defines a doctrine  regarding faith and morals to be held by the universal Church, is, by the Divine assistance promised him in Blessed Peter, possessed of that infallibility with which the Divine Redeemer willed that His Church should be endowed in defining doctrine regarding faith and morals; and that therefore, such definitions of the Roman Pontiff are of themselves, and not from the consent of the Church, irreformable. But if any, may God avert! presume to contradict this our definition, let him be anathema". (Decree on Papal Infallibility, The Vatican Council 1870, Pope Pius IX. From: "Dogmatic Canons and Decrees", P. 256).

Canon Law 1917: Canon 188: 4: "All offices shall be vacant ispo facto by tacit resignation in the following cases... If a cleric has publicly lapsed from the Catholic Faith".

"The Rule Of Faith", guides even the Popes, the Church Councils, and the Apostles themselves"1.) Sacred Scripture. 2.) The Apostolic Traditions.  3.) The Authority of the Church.  4.) The Authority of the Councils.  5.) The Fathers of the Church.  6.) The Authority of the Pope.  7.) Miracles.  8.) The Harmony of Faith and Reason" (St. Francis De Sales, "The Catholic Controversy", Table of Contents, from Tan Books).

St. Vincent of Lerins, 434 A.D., famous "Commonitory", Ch. 3, "Explanation of The Rule Of Faith" says: "... What if some novel contagion, seek to infect not merely an insignificant portion of the Church, but the whole? Then it will be his care to cleave to antiquity... collate, consult, interrogate the opinions of the ancients... living in different times and places, yet continuing in the communion and faith of the one Catholic Church, stand forth acknowledged and approved authorities... to have been taught, written and held, not by one or two of these only, but by all, equally, with one consent, openly, frequently, persistently, is to be believed without any doubt or hesitation".
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Catholics who remain faithful to tradition are not like so-called Old Catholics who are schismatics and heretics who reject the doctrines of Papal Infallibility and the Immaculate Conception, which were always believed by the Church, but only dogmatically defined in 1870. Whereas the Masonic doctrines of Vatican II were always condemned by the Church and were never part of “The Faith once delivered to the Saints” (Jude 1: 3).

 “Because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privately to spy on our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into servitude. To whom we yielded not by subjection, no not for an hour, that the truth of the Gospel might continue with you” (Gal. 2: 4,5).

The Great Western Schism in the Middle Ages saw 3 claimants to the Papacy at the same time. There were 6 saints then, and only 2 of them had the right Pope! It lasted for 70 years.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
God says: Right is might! The Devil says: Might is right! The religion of God is: “God made man” – Jesus Christ! The religion of the Devil is “man made God”. St. John Vianney said: “To him that gives himself up to the guidance of The Holy Ghost, there seems to be no world; To those who give themselves up to the world, there seems to be no
God”
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    “The Danger of Sensationalism”

In 1984:  "In Cardinal Ratzinger's declaration to Vittorio Messori... After stating that he had read the third secret, the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith answered the journalist, who asked why this secret was still not revealed: 'Because, according to the judgment of the Popes, it adds nothing to what a Christian must already know from Revelation: a radical call to conversion, the absolute gravity of history, dangers threatening the life and faith of the Christian, and therefore, the world. And also the importance of the "last times"... But the things contained in this third secret correspond to what is announced in Scripture, and are confirmed by many other Marian apparitions, beginning with the Fatima apparitions themselves in their known contents. Conversion and penance are essential conditions for salvation. To publish the third secret would mean exposing the Church to the danger of sensationalism, exploitation of the content'." (The Whole Truth About The Third Secret", p.771, pt. 3, ch.7, by Frere Michel De La Saint Trinite). From The Fatima Crusader Ph. 1-800-263-8160.

  The following excerpt from “Windswept House” by a Vatican insider and best-selling author Fr. Malachi Martin, S.J. The author of the book says it is fiction, but like Orwell’s “1984”, or Swifts “Gullivers Travels”. It is based on reality. The excerpt is from the “Historical Prologue: Signs of the End Times” of the aforesaid book by Malachi Martin. “Historical” means not fiction! “All understood the need to remain undetected; for the Rule says, “The guarantee of our tomorrow is todays persuasion that we do not exist” The excerpt is from the chapter: “1963”, which comes after the opening chapter about the Fatima apparitions, which are historical, as he described, and which the Church has authenticated and verified as real, and which Malachi Martin professed complete belief and credence in, during public interviews. He was shown “The Third Secret of Fatima” by Pope John XIII himself. Other approved clergy who also read it, said that it spoke of apostasy in the Church beginning at the top! The real secret was never made public. The version of it released by the Vatican in 2000, was an obviously contrived absurdity. Genuine communications from Heaven always make sense and are manifestly true, as the previous two parts of the message of Our Lady of Fatima made public before the 1960s are. That is one of the signs that they are from Heaven.

If you think that some of what follows is far out, so were the things that began to happen in Catholic Churches throughout the world, including Rome, after Vatican II. Only such facts could explain so much sacrilege, blasphemy, and downright Satanic doings. “A tree is known by it’s fruits” (Matt. 7: 15-20).

The program of modern society with its cult of sensuality since the 1960s reflects the agenda of the O.T.O., the most powerful secret society in the world, at the top of esoteric Freemasonry: “this organization was formed for the express purpose of substituting the phallic religion for Christianity… Apart from its secret phallic doctrine the O.T.O seeks to unite with a revival of Gnosticism, the study of the Jewish Cabala, Esoteric Lamaism and Indian Yogism (read the Bible and see what God says about these other religions). It seeks to extract from their combined doctrines the practical application of Eastern sorcery and Western witchcraft…” (Occult Theocracy, P. 574-5, Ch. 105, Vol. 2, by Lady Queenborough).
Believe it or not, the world’s elite - governments, royalty, the intelligence community, media, celebrities etc., gather annually at an elite men’s club in California called Bohemian Grove where they worship Moloch, and run naked through the woods (no kidding!) engaging in orgies. Their safety from public scrutiny in such things lies in the complicity of the media, and in that fact that such things are so far out that most people would not believe them. Moloch is the ancient Chanaanite god against which the true God of the Bible fulminated. Everyone who wants to walk the corridors of power in The New World Order has to be in on it. All the recent Presidents of the U.S. and politicians have been on record and on camera there.

Our Lady of La Salette, 1846, approved by the Church, said “Rome would lose the faith and become the seat of Antichrist”. This is evidently what the real  3rd  Secret of Fatima said too. Pope St. Pius X said that the characteristic of Antichrist is man centered religion with the idea that man is God (E Supremi Apostolatus): See 2 Thess. 2: 4:
Pope Paul VI address closing "Vatican II", Dec. 7, 1965, "The Church of the Council, it is true, has been very much occupied with man... man completely occupied with himself, man who not only makes himself the centre of everything that interests him, but who dared to proclaim himself the principle and ultimate reason of all reality... Secularizing and profane humanism has appeared finally in its terrible stature, and in a certain sense defied the Council. The religion of God Who became man, has encountered the religion (for it is one) of man who makes himself God. What happened? A clash, a battle, an anathema? This could have happened, but it did not take place. You modern humanists... recognize our new humanism: we too, more than anybody, have the cult of man". ("The Whole Truth About Fatima: The Third Secret", p. 782, Pt. 3, Section 2, ch.7, by Frere Michel De La Saint Trinite. From: The Fatima Crusader: Out of Print).                                                                       

1963: “The enthronement of the fallen archangel Lucifer was effected within the Roman Catholic Citadel on June 29, 1963; a fitting date for the historic promise to be fulfilled. As the principle agents for this ceremonial well knew, Satanist tradition had long predicted that the time of the prince would be ushered in at the moment when a Pope would take the name of the Apostle Paul. That requirement – the signal of The Availing Time had begun – had been accomplished just 8 days before with the election of the latest Peter-in-the line…” (See end of this quote for what Catholic dogma has to say about this)... the Supreme Tribunal had decided there could be no more perfect date for the enthronement of the prince than this feast day of the twin Princes of the Citadel, Saints Peter and Paul. And ther could be no more perfect place than the Chapel of St. Paul itself, situated as it was so near to the Apostolic Palace… then every element of the celebration of the Calvary Sacrifice must be turned on its head by the other and opposite celebration. The sacred must be profaned. The profane must be adored. The unbloody representation of the sacrifice of the Nameless one on the Cross (I refuse to use the blasphemy verbatim from the text -ed.)must be replaced by the supreme and bloody violation of the dignity of the Nameless one. Guilt must be accepted as innocence. Pain must give joy. Grace, repentance, pardon must all be drowned in an orgy of opposites. And it must all be done without mistakes. The sequence of events, the meaning of the words, the significance of the actions must all comprise the perfect enactment of sacrilege, the ultimate ritual of treachery… The immediate aim of every ceremonial, he knew, is to venerate “the abomination of desolation”. But the further aim now must be to oppose the Nameless Almighty in His stronghold, to occupy the Almighty’s citadel during the Availing Time, to secure the ascent of the prince in the citadel as an irresistible force, to supplant the citadels Keeper, to take full possession of the Keys entrusted to the Keeper of the Almighty (These hostile and alien powers are only as strong as Catholics are ignorant of the relevant doctrines, see end of this extract –ed.)… The guardian tackled the problem of security head on. Such unobtrusive elements as the Pentagram and the black candles and the appropriate draperies could be part of the ceremonial in Rome. But other rubrics – the bowl of bones and the ritual din, for example, the sacrificial animals and the victim – would be too much. There would have to be a parallel enthronement… No need to doubt his desire to encompass the ultimate strategy in the battle – the end of the Roman Catholic Church as the Papal institution it had been since the Nameless Almighty had founded it. There was no need to explain that the ultimate aim wasn’t exactly to liquidate the Roman Catholic organization. Leo understood how unintelligent that would be, how wasteful. Far better to make that organization into something truly useful, to homogenize and assimilate it into a grand worldwide order of human affairs. To confine it to broad humanist – and only humanist goals. Likeminded experts though they were, the Guardian and the American Bishop reduced their arrangements for the twin ceremonial events to a roster of names and an inventory of rubrics… men of the highest caliber. High-ranking churchmen, and laymen of substance. Genuine servitors of the prince within the citadel… All understood the need to remain undetected; for the Rule says, “The guarantee of our tomorrow is todays persuasion that we do not exist” … men and women who had made their mark in corporate, government, and social life… But the victim, his Excellency said – a child – would be truly a prize for the violation of innocence… During the event the pulse of every participants heart must be attuned to hate, not love… the group has persisted in protective obscurity as a foreign body and an alien spirit within the host of its victim. It permeated offices and activities throughout the Roman citadel, spreading its symptoms throughout the bloodstream like a subcutaneous infection. Symptoms like cynicism and indifference, malfeasance and misfeasance in high office, inattention to correct doctrine, neglect of moral judgment, loss of acuity in sacral observance… Agnes seemed quiet and compliant for a change… She had been dressed in a loose white gown that reached to her ankles. And like her puppy on the altar, she had been mildly sedated against the time of her usefulness in the mysteries. ‘Agnes’, Medico purred into the child’s ear. It’s almost time to come with daddy’. ‘Not my daddy…’. Despite the drugs, the girl opened her eyes and stared at her father. Her voice was weak but audible. ‘God is my daddy…’. Blasphemy! Agnes words transformed Leo’s mood of satisfaction exactly as electrical energy is transformed into lightening… ‘Not my daddy… you let Flinnie be taken… Mustn’t hurt Flinnie…. Only a little puppy… little puppies are made by God…. Not my daddy… Daddies don’t do things God doesn’t like… don’t hurt me…  don’t hurt Jesus”. In later years, Agnes memory of this night – for remember it she finally did – would contain no titillating edge, no trace of the merely pornographic. Her memory of this night, when it came, would be one with her memory of her entire childhood. One with her memory of prolonged assault by summary evil… She knew the price of resistance. Felt her body being shifted from her fathers lap. Saw the light glinting on the spectacles of the Archpriest… saw the needle in his hand. Felt the puncture. Felt the shock of the drug again… But still she struggled… Struggled against the blasphemy; against the effects of violation; against the chanting; against the horror she knew was still to come… the Roman Phalanx took up the Mysteries refrain set out for them in their Latin Missals, beginning with the Hymn of the Virgin Raped and ending with the Crown of thorns invocation (blasphemy)… I believe in the only begotten son of the  cosmic dawn’ Leo chanted. ‘And his name is Lucifer’. The second ancient response. Leo’s acolytes lighted the Pentagram candles and incensed the Pentagram’… ‘I believe in the ancient Leviathan”… “And his name is Hate… The fifth invocation: ‘I believe in the ancient Fox’. And the fifth lusty response: ‘And his name is lie’… With all eyes on him, an acolyte stepped to the altar, reached into the cage where the puppy wagged its tail in expectant greeting, pinned the hapless creature with one hand and, with the other, performed a perfectly executed vivisection removing the reproductive organs first from the screaming animal. Expert that he was, the attendant prolonged both the puppy’s agony and the participants frenzied joy at the ritual of pain giving… There was the sound of Agnes silent scream at the agony of her puppy… The sound of supplication and suffering. ‘God is my daddy’!... Holy God!... My little puppy!... Don’t hurt Flinnie!... Don’t hurt Jesus!... Holy God…’… Leo was delighted. What a perfect little victim. So pleasing to the prince. Pitilessly and without pause, Leo and the Guardian led their congregations on through the rest of the 14 invocations, while the Convenient Actions that followed each response became a raucous theater of perversity… ‘I believe that the Prince of this World will be enthroned this night in the ancient citadel, and from there he will create a New Community’. The response was delivered with gusto impressive even in this ghastly milieu. ‘And its name will be the Universal Church of man’… The Archpriest placed the Host on Agnes’ chest and held the chalice of wine above her pelvis… ‘We ask you, Lord Lucifer, Prince of Darkness. Garner all our victims. To accept our offering. Unto the commission of many sins’… Bishop and Archpriest pronounced the holiest words of the Latin Mass. At the elevation of the Host: ‘Hoc est enim Corpus Meum…’  Immediately the participants responded with a renewal of the ritual din, a deluge of confusion, a babel of words and rattling bones, with random lascivious acts of every kind, while the Bishop ate a tiny fragment of the Host and took a small sip from the chalice… Then anxious not to miss any part of the Ritual Violation of the Victim, they returned quickly to their kneeler chairs and watched expectantly as the Bishop focused his full attention on the child. Agnes tried to free herself as the weight of the Bishop came upon her… there was the Archpriest waiting his turn at this most ravenous sacrilege. There was her father waiting. There was the fire from the black tapers reflecting red in their eyes…. Fire that would… burn forever… As those servitors of Lucifer violated her on that defiled and unholy altar, so too did they violate that Lord Who was her father and mother to her. Just as He transformed her weakness with His courage, so also did he sanctify her desecration with the outrages of His scourging… It was to Him that she fled for refuge when she lost consciousness… ‘Under the sacrosanct instructions from the mountaintop… with the triple stole of unholiness, I now place in your hands The Triple Crown of St. Peter according to the adamantine will of Lucifer so that you reign there. So that there one Church be. One Church from sea to sea, one vast mighty congregation… By mandate of the Assembly and Sacrosanct Elders, I do institute, authorize and recognize this Chapel, to be known henceforth as the inner Chapel, as taken and possessed and appropriated by him whom we have enthroned as Lord and Master of our human fate. Whosoever shall, by means of this inner Chapel, be designated and chosen as the final In-the-line Successor in the Petrine Office, shall by his every oath of Office commit himself and all he does command to be the willing instrument of the builder of man’s home on earth and throughout man’s cosmos. He shall transform the ancient enmity into friendship, tolerance, and assimilation as these are implied to the models of birth, education, work, finance, commerce, industry, learning, culture, living and giving life, dying and dealing death. So shall the New Age of man be modeled. So mote it be! The Guardian led the Roman Phalanx in the ritual response… The next order of the ritual, the Bill of Instructions, was in reality a solemn oath of betrayal by which every cleric present in St. Paul’s Chapel – Cardinal, Bishop, Monsignore alike – would intentionally and deliberately desecrate the Sacrament of Holy Orders… ‘Do each and all now solemnly swear that your administration of office will be bent to fulfill the aims of the Universal Church of Man?’ ‘We do solemnly swear’. Are you each and all prepared to signal this unanimous will with your own blood, so strike you Lucifer, if you are unfaithful to this Oath of Commitment?’ “We are willing and prepared’. ‘Are you each and fully consenting that, by this Oath, you transfer Lordship and possession of your souls from the Ancient Enemy, the Supreme Almighty, to the all powerful hands of our lord Lucifer?’ ‘We consent’.  (do you want “friendship, tolerance and assimilation” with that? –ed.) With a golden pin, the granite faced Roman pricked the tip of the delegates left thumb and pressed a bloody print beside the delegate’s name on the Bill of Authorization…
The members of the Roman Phalanx emerged from the Court of St. Damasus in the small hours of the feast day of Saints Peter and Paul. Some of the Cardinals and a few of the Bishops acknowledged the salutes of the respectful security guards with an absentminded Cross of priestly blessing traced in the air as they entered their limousines. Within moments, the walls of St. Pauls glowed, as they always had, with their lovely paintings and frescoes of \Christ, and of the Apostle Paul whose name the latest Peter-In-The Line had taken”.  (Windswept House, P. 7-20, Ch. History as Prologue: End Signs, By Fr. Malachi Martin, publisher: Doubleday).  

Popes and Antipopes: When Cardinal Siri came out of the Conclave where he was truly elected Pope and the election was suppressed by B’nai B’rith, who imposed Angelo Roncalli, a Rosicrucian Freemason instead, Cardinal Siri said that what happened in the conclave he was bound by oath not to divulge. He said it was horrible. He said: “very serious things have taken place” (The Third Secret of Fatima and Impostor Lucia (compared with the true Lucia) by Bro. Michael Dimond, Most Holy Family Monastery .Com). He should have known that such oaths were not binding, and that it was wrong to conceal what would save the highest office of the Church, upon which depends the salvation of millions of souls. The following remark was about the Churchmen who took part in Vatican II: “One veteran of the Curia, inured to the firmness of the Roman Pavement, made short work of the Council Fathers by summing them up as “two thousand good-for-nothings.” (The Broken Cross, Pt. 3: 2, P. 46, by Piers Compton).

John XXIII: “These lights are for the masters of the past who are here among us” explained the master of the ceremony receiving Angelo Roncalli into the Masonic Rosicrucian lodge. “…The Master then bent over him. ‘We are known to each other by the names we choose for ourselves. With that name each of us seals his liberty and his scheme of work, and so makes a new link in the chain. What will your name be? The answer was ready. There was no hesitation. ‘Johannes’, said his disciple… The Master took up the sword, approached Roncalli, and placed the tip of the blade on his head; and with its touch something that Roncalli could only liken to exquisite amazement, new and irrepressible, flowed into every part of his being* …Roncalli’s apprehension increased when he found that no-one like himself, an initiate of only the 1st degree, was allowed to enter the Temple unless a task of great importance was about to be entrusted to him… On the walls were the mysterious words Azoth and Tetragrammaton. The latter stands for the terrible, ineffable, and unpronounceable name of the Creator of the universe, which was said to have been inscribed on the upper face of the foundation stone in the Holy of Holies in the Temple of Jerusalem. It figures in the pattern that is used in the evoking of evil spirits, or sometimes as a protection from them, a pattern that is known as a great magic circle on the ground. It is some 8 feet in diameter, within which another, or secondary circle is drawn… Also in the Temple was a Cross picked out in red and black, and the number 666, the number of the Beast of the Apocalypse… Those numbers said to be all powerful in the working of miracles and magic, are associated with the solar god of Gnosticism… who is represented as a serpent … He suddenly realized that, without consciously framing them, he was being given words of power that streamed from him in a voice he failed to recognize as his own. But he was able to see that everything he said was being written down by one who had been referred to as the Grand Chancellor of the Order… The Order of the Rose and Cross has existed from time immemorial, and it’s mystic rites were practiced and it’s wisdom taught in Egypt, Eleusis, Samothrace, Persia, Chaldea, India, and thus was handed down to posterity the secret wisdom (“The learning of wickedness is not wisdom”. Ecclusus 19: 19 – ed.) of the Ancient Ages. (The Broken Cross, Pt. 2: 2, P. 28-34, by Piers Compton), from Omni CBC Publications.

Paul VI: “After Pope Paul VI’s death in 1978, there was no crucifix, nor even a Cross on the catafalque when his body was placed for veneration in St. Peters Piazza. In like fashion, there had been no crucifix on the table that served for an altar at the Supreme Pontiff’s inaugural Mass. The reasons for such lack of Christian veneration become more understandable in the light of Roger Peyrefitte’s work, “The Keys of St. Peter”, wherein we are informed that Montini (Paul VI) belonged to “the Equinox”, an official organ of the Order Knights Templar (O.T.O.). Joined to the O.T.O. is the Order of Johannites who practice the “Discipline Arcane” which is mystic and occult Devil worship “of the secret”. Montini, as a hierophant of the Luciferian Order of the “Great White Brothers”, was looked upon as a great Luciferian spiritual mystic or a “Perfect One” on the Arcane Council. Also according to Peyrefitte the object of this occult order is the establishment of a “New World Order”, the destruction of the Christian Order and the erection upon it of a World Theocratic State…” (The Popes of the Second Vatican Council, P. 19,20, by Dr. James Wardner, unpublished manuscript. Author of “Unholy Alliances” available from Omni CBC Publications, (661) 274-2240).

“The Illuminated Ones led by the Great White Lodge play a very important role in that they direct the leaders in the field of religion, economics, education, literature and politics. They are the elite, the power blocs that run the entire world.” (The Illuminati In America, Ch. 8, P. 52, by Dr. John Coleman, 2008).

Pope Leo XIII: “No-one unless in communion with Peter can share in his authority (He explains in this same encyclical that in “communion with Peter” means being a partisan of Jesus Christ who professes the true faith, as handed down by Apostolic tradition) since it absurd to imagine that he who is outside can command in the Church… Against which gates of Hell we read that Peter received the saving Keys, that is to say, our Prince, to whom it was said by Christ: ‘To thee I will give the Keys to the Kingdom of Heaven, and the gates of Hell shall not conquer them’. Whence is it therefore that you strive to obtain for yourselves the Keys to the Kingdom of Heaven – you who fight against the Chair of Peter” (Pope Leo XIII, “Satis Cognitum”).

 “He that enters not by the Door into the sheepfold, but climbs up another way, the same is a thief and a robber… Jesus therefore said to them again: Amen, amen, I say to you, I am the Door of the sheep. All others… are thieves and robbers: and the sheep heard them not… The thief comes not but to kill, to steal, and to destroy. I Am come that they may have life…`` (Jn. 10: 1-10).

 “In those days there went out of Israel wicked men, and they persuaded many, saying: Let us go, and make a covenant with the heathens that are around about us… And they built the City of David with a great and strong wall… and they placed there a sinful nation, wicked men, and they fortified themselves therein… and they became a great snare. And this was a place to lie in wait against the sanctuary, an evil Devil in Israel… And King Antiochus wrote to all his kingdom, that all the people should be one: and everyone should leave his own law. And many of Israel consented to his service, and they sacrificed to idols, and profaned the Sabbath. And the king sent letters by the hand of messengers to Jerusalem, and to all the cities of Juda: that they should follow the law of the nations of the earth, and should forbid holocausts and sacrifices and atonements to be made in the Temple of God … King Antiochus set up the abominable idol of desolation upon the altar of God (They abolished the Mass and replaced it with a counterfeit heretical “mass”. John Paul II put a statue of Bhudda on the tabernacle and altar of God at Assisi in 1986 –ed.). The holy places are come into the hands of strangers… God be merciful to us: it is not profitable for us to forsake the law, and the justices of God… to go another way… And they recovered the law out of the hands of the nations, and out of the hands of the Kings: and they yielded not the horn to the sinner… And fear not the words of a sinful man, for his glory is dung and worms: today he is lifted up, and tomorrow he will not be found, because he is returned into his earth and his thought is come to nothing. You, therefore, my sons take courage, and behave manfully in the law: for by it you will be glorious… for there is no difference in the sight of the God of Heaven to deliver with a great multitude, or with a small company: for the success of war is not in the multitude of an army, but strength comes from Heaven. They come against us with an insolent multitude, and with pride, to destroy us… But we will fight for our lives and for our laws. And the Lord Himself will overthrow them before our face: but as for you, fear them not” (1 Mach. 1: 16, 35-47 & 2: 8, 21, 22, 48, 62-64 & 3: 18-22).
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*   This is diabolic phenomena. So is the gift of second sight which Rosicrucians boast of having. John Paul II often spoke of “amazement at man”, when he preached the new gospel of man. Second sight and involuntary speech, of words that are not one’s own, and with a voice that is not one’s own, are indications exorcists look for when they are determining if someone is really possessed by the Devil or not. Rosicrucians worship Bahomet, a Devil, and call him God.     
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Examples of the heresies of the Vatican II Popes: Benedict XVI has denied infant Baptism, original sin, the real presence of Jesus Christ in the Blessed Sacrament, “the filioque” of the Nicene Creed, the inerrancy of the Bible, that outside the Church there is no salvation, that the Old Covenant is void, and his church has prevented sincere and well meaning people from becoming Catholics. He stated that Vatican II was “the Anti-Syllabus”, that is, in direct violation and contradiction to “The Syllabus of Errors”, by Pope Pius IX and the Vatican Council 1870. All one has to do is to compare the Church before 1958 to after. It would not be possible to be more heretical than the Popes after 1958!
See: Most Holy Family Monastery.Com. Free on line video, or DVD: “Why John-Paul II Cannot Be Pope”, and similar documentaries.

If we are to believe the O.T.O: “Pikes prophesy was fulfilled when Thelema got not one, but 3 of their own on the Chair of Peter… John XXIII, Paul VI, and John Paul II” (Blood On The Altar, Ch. 8, P. 104, by Craig Heimbichner), Also, “A dessicated figure on a twisted stick was forbidden by Canon 1279, which condemned the usage of any sacred image not in keeping with the approved usage of the Church” (The Broken Cross, Pt. 4: 2, P. 72, by Piers Compton, both books from Omni CBC Publications: 661-274-2240). This crucifix on the pastoral staff of “Popes” since Paul VI, was on display at the museum of witchcraft in Bayonne, France.

“So striking is the disagreement between their criminal teachings and the pure doctrine of Christ, that no greater can exist: ‘For what participation hath justice with injustice, and what fellowship hath light with darkness’.” 2 Cor. 6: 14.” (Pope Leo  XIII in “Quod Apostolici Muneris” in “A Light In the Heavens”, from Tan Books). There is no such thing as Vatican II, because that Masonic Congress 1963-65 in the Vatican had nothing in common with the Vatican Council of 1870, or with any true and holy Council of the Church.
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------To be or become Catholic, in view of the Vatican II situation, this is what you can do: What I recommend can easily be verified by consulting pre-1958 sources.

 The Fraternity of St. Peter’s priests are ordained using the old rite of ordination, but by new rite bishops, which are probably invalid. See: TraditionalMass . org.

Traditionalists are not “the silver bullet” for what ails the Church. “As soon as any political movement becomes inevitable…” Freemasonry “takes the secret leadership of the opposing faction… by creating and backing a new opposition, it holds, not the balance of power but all power.” (The Occult Theocrasy, Ch. 29: P. 204, by Lady Queenborough, from Omni CBC Publications). Traditional Bishops and priests are divided into groups or religious orders ostensibly divided and quarreling about how to proceed in the current circumstances of the Church in the aftermath of Vatican II. But it is obvious that these differences are artificial and due to a Masonic policy of keeping Catholics divided and conquered, and firmly under control.

Traditional Catholics are true Catholics, so it stands to reason that they who have an agenda to destroy Catholicism would most especially target traditional Catholics for infiltration and subjugation. “The OTO is always and everywhere determined to impose the Kabbalistic paradigm by controlling the opposition… Tridentine Mass attendance is nowadays limited to small pockets of Catholics who, (are) targets of occult infiltration… Here we are reminded of the ancient alchemical dictum, solve et coagula (break down and reform). The Tridentine Mass of yore sanctified countless clergy and laity and some of the best beloved saints of the Church. But hundreds  of millions of people devoted to it were – with remarkable dispatch – stripped away almost at the twinkling of an eye, with the long-term objective of creating a new, much more circumscribed Tridentine Mass movement rigidly controlled by the occult.” (Blood On The Altar, Ch. 3, P. 44, by Craig Heimbichner). From Omni. However, there are many good and true bishops and priests. It’s not all bad, but one needs to beware!

Such bishops do not qualify as potential candidates for the Papacy, because, as Masonic infiltrators, they are regarded as heretics and apostates (Canon 1065 quoted by Fr. Cahill, S.J. “Freemasonry and the Antichristian Movement”, Ch.6, P, 130-1. Imprimatur 1930). All hope of electing a valid and true pope in the future does not depend on the sorry crop of anti-Christian bishops now in the world. The Church could very well revert to the practice of ancient times in which a humble, worthy and learned layman is chosen by the Catholics who profess the true faith, ordained a priest, consecrated bishop and made pope. Celestine V was a monk when he was chosen for the papacy and St. Ambrose, Bishop, and Doctor of the Church was a mere catechumen when he was chosen by popular acclaim and forthwith ordained a priest and then consecrated bishop. But God will order things in due time so as to avoid disorders like some that have occurred in recent years. Canon 1258 forbidding Catholics to worship with heretics does not oblige in their regard, because they outwardly profess the true faith, and have not been declared heretics by legitimate authority (which the post 1958 popes are not – the heresies they have condoned, professed and promoted leave no doubt about that), and so Catholics may fulfill their Sunday obligation of Mass at their chapels and receive their Sacraments, says St. Thomas Aquinas, “Summa Theologica”, Vol. 5, Q.82, Art. 9: “The Minister of the Eucharist”, P. 2504: “Until the Church’s sentence is pronounced it is lawful to receive Communion at their hands and to hear Mass.” This is not so in regard to the Vatican II Masses, because the Vatican II institution very manifestly does not profess the true faith, but Masonic philosophy, and because the changes in the sacramental rites render their sacraments highly doubtful. Catholics may not partake of doubtful sacraments. “A tree is known by its fruits” (Matt. 7: 18).
“Only those are to be considered members of the Church who profess the true faith and are Baptized… Not every sin, however grave it may be, is such as of its own nature as to sever a man from the Church, as does schism or heresy or  apostasy.” (Pope Pius XII, “Mystici Corporis”, 22,). “The Faith of the Apostles is the true faith. We should not believe otherwise than as has been handed down by Apostolic tradition.” (Pope Leo XIII, “Satis Cognitum”, 32).

Catholic doctrine teaches that Marriage and Baptism do not need a priest for validity. If a Catholic priest ordained by rites in use before 1968 is not available, Catholics may Baptize and Marry validly.                                                    
 To Baptize, pre-1958 Church missals and approved catechisms always taught that even a non-Catholic may pour water over the forehead of the person being Baptized while saying: “I Baptize you, in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit”. Do nothing more or less, for validity, as long as the persons intend to do what Christ does in His Church. “The Catechism of The Council of Trent”, from Tan Books. For Marriage, all that is needed is for the couple to exchange religious vows as prescribed by the Church’s tradition before two witnesses. If Catholic’s marry before a Protestant minister, a non-Christian minister or a Justice of the Peace, the marriage is null and void, and incurs excommunication. Catholics cannot contract valid marriage with an unbaptised Christian or non-Christian. The 1917 Code of Canon Law is still the law of the Church, because nothing after 1958 is valid. Not because I say so, but because the Church has always taught that heresy, Freemasonry and other religions sever from the Church. See: “Casti Connubii, (On Christian Marriage), by Pope Pius XI, from Angelus Press, Ph. 1-800-966-7337, and “Arcanum Divinae” (On Marriage), by Pope Leo XIII.
There are encyclicals on Internet, but I found that some of them were doctored. I know that it’s them, not me, because I have old copies of them, and because for example, in the encyclical “Traditi”, by Pope Pius VIII: “lying is their rule, Satan is their God, and shameful deeds their sacrifice” fits reality and what all pre-1958 Popes wrote, whereas: “Law is prevarication, religion, the Devil; sacrifice, disgrace” (March 2010 version on Vatican website) is absurd and does not make sense, and it is what Freemasons would want  to make it say!

Pope Leo XIII said: “The Church… is not an association of Christians brought together by chance, but is a Divinely established and admirably constituted society, having for its direct and proximate purpose to lead the world to peace and holiness”. (“Sapientiae Christianae” in “A Light In The Heavens” from Tan Books).

        “Whosoever shall be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the true faith, which faith except every one do keep whole and undefiled, he will without doubt perish everlastingly… This is the Catholic faith except a man believe faithfully and firmly, he cannot be saved”. (Athanasian Creed).

Heaven is Catholic, and only good Catholics go there! It’s up to you!
“Rather choosing to be afflicted with the people of God, than to have the pleasure of sin for a time. Esteeming the reproach of Christ greater riches than the treasure of the Egyptians” (Heb. 11: 25,26).
                                                                                                                                                    
Jesus Christ instituted the Holy Eucharist as a perpetuation of His triumph over Satan on the Cross. “Then Jesus said to them: Amen, amen I say to you: Except you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you shall not have life in you. He that eats My flesh, and drinks My blood, has everlasting life: and I will raise him up on the last day… As the living Father hath sent Me and I lived by the Father; so he that eats Me the same shall live by Me. This is the bread that came down from Heaven. Not as your fathers did eat manna and are dead. He that eats this bread shall live forever” (Jn. 6: 54-59). “And while they were at supper, Jesus took bread, and blessed, and broke: and gave to His disciples, and said: Take ye and eat. This is My body. And taking the chalice, He gave thanks, and gave to them, saying: Drink ye all of this. For this is the blood of the New Testament, which shall be shed for many unto the remission of sins” (Matt. 26: 26-28). As Sacred Scripture (Jn. 6: 31-70), and the Church have always taught, The Holy Eucharist is the body, blood, soul, and Divinity of Jesus Christ. Eucharistic Miracles occurred whereby from time to time, God manifests the truth of this amazing fact of theology, in which the round wafer of bread consecrated by a priest, turned to flesh when the priest elevated it during the Mass, and bled on the altar linens. When scientists studied these miraculous hosts from the 1st millennia until Vatican II, they found that the flesh was living tissue from one man with the same DNA and blood type: AB positive, in every case occurring in different centuries and different countries and continents, and that the tissue was flesh from the heart (“Eucharistic Miracles”, by Joan Carrol Cruz, from Tan Books 1-800-437-5876).
The Incarnation of Jesus Christ, His life, His death by crucifixion, His resurrection from the dead, and The Holy Eucharist, are proof of the lengths God will go to, to save us and to benefit and sanctify those of us who do what it takes to be His. The Vatican II admission of non-Catholics to Holy Communion is a manifestation of Masonic ritual sacrilege. These usurpers admit non-Catholics to “eat and drink their own condemnation” (1 Cor. 11: 29 paraphrased) by ineligible partaking of the Holy Eucharist, but they often refuse to admit them to membership in the Church, so that they can become eligible for this great sacrament, and rejoice The Lord by receiving Him worthily and devoutly! As the holiness of the Sacrament implies, only Catholics free from mortal sin should receive Holy Communion. One can only obtain valid absolution from older eastern rite Catholic priests, The Society of St. Pius X, Sede-vacantist, or  independent priests ordained by pre-Vatican II rites.
 “False apostles are deceitful workmen, transforming themselves into apostles of Christ.  And no wonder, for Satan himself transforms himself into an Angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers be transformed as ministers of justice, whose end will be according to their works” (2 Cor. 11: 13-15).

Learn from the enemy, tells a seasoned exorcist: “In the entire practice of genuine Satanism, the principle is to do everything backwards. The crucifix is always there but it is hung upside down. A black Mass consists of taking the Roman Mass (the pre-Vatican II Mass) and saying it backwards. By the way, Satanists parody the Roman Mass, not the Novus Ordo (the 1968 Mass). They don’t believe that the Novus Ordo is a real Mass” (“The Kingdom of Darkness”, P. 17, by Malachi Martin S.J., from Triumph Communications (519) 656-9679).     

"None are more faithful to God than the chaste, and none are more ardently attached to the Eucharistic Lamb... they stood fearless and unmoved against the onslaughts of Antichrist and his hordes. Because they were unconquerable, they are the first to herald the coming victory of Christ to the world" ("The Book of Destiny" p. 332, ch. 14: 1, Fr. H.B. Kramer. Imprimatur. Tan Books).

"Generation Of Vipers" (Matt. 23: 33). Ordinary people "have not informed themselves of the mode of thinking and action of the Revolution. Even while soaking up its corrosive incongruities and yielding to its influence, they do not see what they are looking at... the basic error of most people is to read traditional meanings and intentions into its language... How few people realize that the very soul of the revolution is deception, and its total objective is influence... The Revolution has no sympathy for the discontent or internal revulsion of individuals. It is sufficient if the majority outwardly conforms, thus contributing to the illusion it is creating for the masses. Individuals who will not conform, must somehow be removed from the others as they threaten to dispel the illusion of the others. Nor does the Revolution use words as ordinary human beings do... language is a means of furtherance of the Revolutionary program. It is used as a tool, or better, as a weapon, since the program is a phase, and language is a tactic in the struggle for influencing people, not for communicating truth... The "New Mass" is one of the productions of the Revolution, one of its tools of subversion, and the language of the "New Mass" is in the genre of the Revolution. Those who mean to assess the "New Mass" should not expect to find in it the clarity of thought and intention which one expects in the articulations of the Sacred Magisterium of the Church. They should not expect to find clear-cut affirmations and negations. They will find truth suggested - as well as many shades of its opposite. The only constancy they will find, is the effort to confuse and mislead, a refusal to debate fairly... A Revolutionary will believe whatever it serves his immediate purpose to believe... their words are chosen always with a view to inching the thought of the masses into the direction of the Revolutionary negations; away, therefore, from objective truth... supernatural verities, dogmas, and laws, and towards dialectical materialism, naturalism, cynicism, narcissism, and nihilism... The Revolution being indifferent to truth or human feeling (but keenly aware of the usefulness of both), will promise anything, give every impression of sincerity, create as convincing a rationale as possible... any change is progress... Exploiting the poor memory, the ignorance, the guilelessness, and the indifference of those who will sacrifice anything to be free of further annoyance (who will surrender every principle, in order not to be thought odd by the majority...) ... being sure to ignore and put to silence all reminders of previous promises for a few minutes peace (which is never permitted, of course) they will allow themselves to be treated like curs". (Fr. J. F. Wathen, O.S.J., "The Great Sacrilege" Ch. 5, P. 313-133. Available from Gerald Bonnell (574) 643-9296).

"In the language of the revolution, "peace" means that situation when all opposition to the "New Order" has been suppressed. And "the people" are not everyone, but the revolutionaries themselves. "Peace to his people", therefore, does not mean peace of soul to those who have received the grace of Christ, nor peace to all men of good will whether they be members of the Church or not, but "Victory for the Revolution", or "All power to the people" (Ibid. "Mistranslations", p.81).

“Crush the enemy whoever he may be… by lies and calumnies… a word which one can ably invent and which one has the art to spread amongst certain honorable chosen families… a word can sometimes kill a man”. (Grand Orient Freemasonry Unmasked, The Hidden Power Behind Communism, P. 92, Ch. 14, by Msgr. Dhillon, D.D.. 1999 Printing). From Omni, & Catholic Treasures: 1-800-257-4893.     
                                                                                                                                                   
"The essential act of the party is to use conscious deception, while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. In the face of an enemy, it means the habit of impudently claiming that black is white, in contradiction of the plain facts... this demands a continuous alteration of the past, made possible by a system of thought ... known in Newspeak as "Doublethink"... If the facts say otherwise, then the facts must be altered. This day to day falsification of the past, carried out by the Ministry of Truth, is as necessary to the stability of the regime as the work of espionage and repression carried out by the Ministry of Love... Past events, it is argued, have no objective existence, but survive only in written records and human memories. The past is whatever the records and the memories agree on. And since the party is in full control of the records, and equally in control of the minds of its members, it follows that the past is whatever the party chooses to make it". ("1984", p. 169-171, by George Orwell).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What follows addresses the fact that the Synagogue has an Anti-Catholic tradition. It also polemicizes a little, but it does not attack Jews, or incite hatred. It is not AntiSemetic.

The Catholic Church and Anti-Semitism: “What is meant by the term (Anti-Semitism)? It means the hatred of the Jews as a race. The Jews, however, use the word to designate any form of opposition to themselves, and they strive persistently to associate irrationality and want of balance with the term. They evidently want the world to believe that anyone who opposes Jewish pretensions is more or less mentally deranged. Now, first of all, it must be remarked that the term is too wide and too loose. The Arabs are doubtless Semites. Yet, the Arabs in Palestine, on account of their opposition to Jewish domination, are Anti-Semites”. (“The Kingship of Christ and the Conversion of the Jewish Nation”, Ch.6, P. 78, by Fr. Denis Fahey, C.S.Sp., D.D., Ph. D., B.A., Professor of Philosophy and History, Holy Ghost Missionary College, Dublin, Ireland. Imprimatur: 1953).

Note:  If anti-Semitism is supposed to be so unacceptable a thing, then why should anti-Catholicism be less so? If one scrutinizes the term “Semite” one finds that it derives from Sem, one of the two sons whom Noah blessed. It is clear from the blessing itself that this blessing became hereditary upon those who follow the true religion of the true God: “Blessed be the Lord God of Sem, be Chanaan his servant” (Gen. 9: 26). For example, Edomites and Moabites and the 10 lost tribes of Israel were descended from Sem too, but they were not considered to be inheritors of the same blessings. And since Jesus Christ is the God of Sem, and the source of all blessings, and by nature, the heir of King David, and the inheritor of all blessings, it would logically follow that to be against Jesus Christ is what it truly means to be anti-Semetic. “For all the promises of God are in Him” (2 Cor. 1: 20).

"The Jewish attitude towards Our Lord has not changed. 'The sovereign pontiffs'  Pope Gregory XIII wrote, 'ever anxious for the conversion of the Jews, have received them kindly, have graciously allowed them to dwell amongst their own subjects and have always striven with pious zeal to draw them to the light of truth. In addition, they have helped them to secure the necessaries of life, and have forbidden all to injure or insult them and to their benevolence have bestowed many priveleges on them for their protection. The Jews, however, in no way softened by these benefits, and with their ancient anti-Christian attitude unchanged, do not cease, in their Synagogues and everywhere, to rage against Our Lord Jesus Christ, now gloriously reigning in Heaven. Moved by an intense hatred of the members of Christ, they continue to plan horrible crimes against the Christian religion with daily increasing audacity...' Pope (now Saint -ed.) Pius V expelled the Jews from the whole territory of the Papal States... In the letter 'Hebraeorum Gens' he explains why he did so: 'Their wickedness which has been developed by every evil art, has now reached such a point that, in view of our common safety, We feel it expedient to check the spread of such a disease by applying a speedy remedy. We have clear and definite proof of how this perverse race hates the name of Christ, how hostile they are to all who bear His name, and by what tricks and frauds they plot against the lives of Christians" ("Apologia Pro Vita Mea" by Fr. Denis Fahey C.S.Sp., D.D., Ph.D., B.A., Professor of Philosophy and Church History, Holy Ghost Missionary College, Kimmage, Dublin, Ireland, 1953. Books available from:Omni Publications (661-274-2240)).

“His Excellency Right Rev. Antonio Garcia, Bishop of Tuy, one of the signatories of the letter of the Spanish hierarchy, 1937, has summed up…: It is evident that the present conflict is one of the most terrible wars waged by Antichrist, that is, by Judaism against the Catholic Church and against Christ. At this crisis in the history of the world, Jewry uses two formidable armies: one secret, namely that of Freemasonry; the other open and avowed, with hands dripping with blood, that of the Communists and all other associated bodies”. (“The Kingship of Christ & the Conversion of the Jewish Nation”, P. 54, Ch. 4, 1987 printing, by Fr. Denis Fahey, C.S.Sp., D.D., Ph.D., B.A., Professor of Philosophy and Church History, Holy Ghost Missionary College, Dublin, Ireland. Imprimatur 1953).

"We have seen the disordered choice that the Jewish nation, under the guidance of its leaders, made in regard to our Divine Lord Jesus Christ. Their opposition has not only had sad consequences in retarding the worlds acceptance of Him, but is having mournful effects on themselves. The persistent rejection of the one Mediator, Jesus Christ, in spite of abundant light and grace, is having the inevitable consequences so strikingly indicated by Popes Leo XIII and Pope Pius XI. 'The case of governments', wrote Pope Leo XIII, 'is much the same as that of individuals: they also must run into fatal issues, if they depart from the way… Let Jesus be excluded, and human reason is left without its greatest protection and illumination: the very notion is easily lost of the end for which God created human society… Their minds busy with a hundred confused projects, rulers and subjects alike, travel a devious road, bereft, as they are, of safe guidance and fixed principles. Just as it is pitiable and calamitous to wander out of the way, so it is to desert the truth.' (Tametsi, Pope Leo XIII). 'The moral conduct of mankind is grounded on faith in God kept pure and true. Every attempt to dislodge moral teaching and moral conduct from the rock of faith, and to erect them on the shifting sands of human regulations, sooner or later leads the individual and the community to moral destruction.'  (On the condition of the Church in Germany, Pope Pius XI, 1939)... "These principles… apply with greater force to the Jewish Nation and its leaders than to others, for they have rejected greater graces and turned against God with direr ingratitude. They are Our Lords own people according to the flesh. It is no wonder, then, that we find such terrible divagations from order in the books or codes which their leaders have compiled to guide and direct their relations with God and their fellow men. We need not be surprised that as their power in the world increases, the Jews are, on the one hand, ceasing to believe in the God of Israel and are falling prey to Pantheism, especially in its materialistic and Marxian form, and that, on the other hand, they are utilizing methods opposed to natural and supernatural law. Their propagation of atheistic Communism, their treatment of the Arabs in Palestine and the methods of the Anti-Defamation League in the U.S.A. are striking examples of that moral decay which, according to Popes Leo XIII and Pius XI, is the inevitable consequence of opposition to the Divine plan for order... Instead of the lofty ideal of aiding all nations to live in harmony as members of the Mystical Body of Christ, the Catholic Church, the Jews have made the disordered choice to strive to weaken all the other nations and thus bring them into subjection to themselves. That is the aim of their antisupernatural Messianism."  (The Kingship of Christ and the Conversion of the Jewish Nation, Ch. 8, P. 130, & 131: "Effects... Of Their Opposition To The True Supernatural Messiah", by Fr. Denis Fahey C.S.S.P., B.A., Ph. D., D.D., Professor of History and Philosophy, Holy Ghost Missionary College, Kimmage, Dublin, Ireland).

As the British White Paper report of Sir M. Findlay to Mr. Balfour (of the historic Balfour Declaration) to the British Government of 1918 said: “I consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue now before the world… unless as above stated, Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world, as it is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose object to to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things…” (Vicount Leon DePoncins “The Secret Powers Behind Revolution”, P. 129, Pt.2, Ch.2).

“Masonry is founded on Judaism, and that if the doctrines of Judaism were eliminated from Masonic ritual the residue would be negligible”. (Secret Societies and The Kingship of Christ, P. 55, Ch. “Conclusions Arrived At By Specialists In The Study of Masonry”, by Fr. Denis Fahey, C.S.Sp., D.D., Ph.D., B.A., Professor of Philosophy and History, Holy Ghost Missionary College, Dublin, Ireland).

“On attaining the 18th Degree, a Grand Orient Mason automatically becomes a member of the Alliance Israelite Universelle… The A.I.U. therefore was destined to be the governmental representative of all Jews from whatever country they lived in under the authority of their secret Kahal or community rule… The A.I.U. saw its dream of international Jewish government shattered when Zionism emerged and came to the fore in 1897. It is noteworthy that the “Prophet” of Zionism: Ahad Ha’am (Asher Ginsberg) was a member of A.I.U. and a disciple of Charles Netter. The avowed aims of A.I.U. namely a super-government of the world and a universal religion, both to be Judaic, are being steadily pursued by the “Jewish World Agency” functioning today”. (Occult Theocracy, P. 340, Ch. 41, Bk. I, & P. 487, Ch. 84, Bk. II, by Lady Queenborough).

“Russia Will Spread Her Errors”, (Our Lady of Fatima): Jews are supposed to be a Middle-Eastern people, yet why do many of them look like Germans and Italians? The answer is because there are two classifications of Jews. The Sephardim, which are brown Middle-Eastern looking people because they are the descendants of the Hebrews, and the Ashkenazi’s who look like white people because they originally came from a southern Russian tribe who converted to the Synagogue at the end to the first millennia. It is the latter who constitute the majority and the ruling class among the modern day Jews. On page 50 of this book, the Jewish author, Benjamin Freedman, says: “In 1948 in the Pentagon in Washington, I addressed a large assembly of the highest ranking officers of the United States army principally the G2 branch of Military Intelligence on the highly explosive geopolitical situation in Eastern Europe and the Middle East… I explained to them fully the origin of the Khazars and the Khazar kingdom. I felt then as I feel now that without a clear and comprehensive knowledge of that subject it is not possible to understand or to evaluate properly what has been taking place in the world since 1917, the year of the Bolshevik revolution, the year of the Bolshevik revolution in Russia. It is the key to that problem… The Khazars were not Semites. They were an Asiatic Mongoloid nation. They are classified by modern anthropologists as Turco-Finns racially… They were a very warlike nation… The Khazars invaded eastern Europe to escape further defeats in Asia. The very warlike Khazars did not find it difficult to subdue and conquer the 25 peaceful agricultural nations occupying approximately 1,000,000 square miles in eastern Europe. In a comparatively short period the Khazars established the largest and most powerful kingdom in Europe, and probably the wealthiest also. The Khazars were a pagan nation… Their religious worship was a mixture of phallic worship and other forms of idolatrous worship practiced in Asia by pagan nations... The vile forms of sexual excesses indulged in by the Khazars as their form of religious worship produced a degree of moral degeneracy the Khazar King could not endure. In the 7th century King Bulan, ruler at the time of the Khazar Kingdom, decided to abolish the practice of phallic worship and other forms of idolatrous worship and make one of the 3 monotheistic religions, about which he knew very little, the state religion. After a historic session with representatives of the 3 monotheistic religions King Bulan decided against Christianity and Islam and selected as the future state religion of the religious worship known as “Talmudism”, and now known and practiced as “Judaism”… The converted Khazars were the first population of so-called or self-styled “Jews” in eastern Europe… converted to “Talmudism”, or as it is now known “Judaism”… The Kingdom of the Khazars was firmly established in most of south Russia long before the foundation of the Russian monarchy of the Varangians (855)… at this time the Khazar kingdom stood at the height of its power and was constantly at war… The Russian Varangians established themselves at Kiev… until the final conquest of the Khazars by the Russians… Many members of the Khazar royal family emigrated to Spain. Some went to Hungary, but the great mass of the people remained in their native country”. The author, Benjamin Freedman goes on to quote Professor Graetz, a respected scholar in the Synagogue, and also quoted by learned priests approved by pre-Vatican II Popes, such as Fr. Denis Fahey C.S.Sp., D.D., Ph.D, who says that Hebrew Jews in other parts of the world did not know about the conversion of this “powerful kingdom” to Judaism, and so they thought they could be the 10 lost tribes of the Bible (this is not so, he indicates). He also explains that the Khazars had no alphabet, and so they adopted Hebrew characters, and wrote their Khazar language in Hebrew letters. This is where Yiddish came from. “For  6 centuries, the so-called or self styled Jews of eastern Europe have referred to themselves… as Yiddish… rather than as Russian, Polish, Galacian, Lithuanian, Rumanian, or Hungarian or by the nation in which they were citizens” (Facts Are Facts, P.50-55, by Benjamin Freedman, 1954).
 “The Sephardim had shown themselves good citizens and were therefore subject to no persecutions (perhaps she should have said “prosecutions” – ed.) the Ashkenazim by their extortionate usury and oppressions had made themselves detested by the people, so that rigorous laws were made to restrain their rapacity… The decree of January 28, 1790, conferring on the Jews of Bordeaux (the Sephardim) the rights of French citizens (by King Louis XVI), put the finishing touch to this scheme of liberation. But the proposal to extend this privilege to the Jews of Alsace (Ashkenazi’s) evoked a storm of controversy in the Assembly and also violent insurrections among the Alsatian pesants”. (“Secret Societies & Subversive Movements”, 1924, Ch. 10, P. 247, by Nesta Webster, from Omni Books 661-274-2240).

Given that the Jews are behind Freemasonry and Communism and its descendants Socialism and Humanism, spreading atheism and those things opposed to the Divine law, being themselves subject to the Talmud and the Kaballah as their primary religious code, and not to the Torah (The Old Testament), in practice, is evidently why Our Lady of Fatima said that “Russia would spread her errors throughout the world raising up wars and persecutions of the Church, the good would be martyred, and nations would be annihilated”. It seems that Heaven does not recognize the modern Synagogue as “Jews”: “The Synagogue of Satan who say they are Jews and are not, but do lie” (Apoc. 3: 9). Jews, according to the Bible are those of the Kingdom of Juda who were faithful to the religion of the Old Testament. However, the Bible shows that the people of the Old Testament were constantly rebelling against God, and that it was this rebellion that divided the faithful from the unfaithful at the time of Jesus Christ. Those who were faithful – always the minority rather than the majority, followed Jesus Christ. The rest were cut off by God Who took The Holy Spirit from the Synagogue and gave it to the Church (Acts 1: 5-8 & 2: 1-4): “Well, because of unbelief they were broken off. But you stand by faith: be not highminded, but fear… And they also if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be grafted in: for God is able to graft them in again” (Rom. 11: 20-23). The religion of the New Testament is founded on the Old Testament, and is the religion of the Old Testament: “We by nature are Jews, and not of the Gentiles sinners” (Gal. 2: 15): “Circumcision profits indeed if you keep the law; but if you be a transgressor of the law, your circumcision is made uncircumcision. If then, the uncircumcised keep the justices of the law, shall not this uncircumcision be accounted circumcision?... For it is not he that is a Jew, who is so outwardly; nor is that circumcision which is outwardly in the flesh: But he is a Jew, that is one inwardly; and the circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God” (Rom. 2: 25-29). This corresponds to the Old Testament: “Circumcise therefore, the foreskin of your heart, and stiffen your neck no more” (Deut. 10: 16).

“They have never met with greater kindness than in the dominions of Christian rulers” (Pope Gregory XIII, “Antiqui Judaeorum”)… “The Catholic Church and the rulers who governed according to her maxims kept the Jews at a distance from Christians (not due to unfair prejudice, but for the protection of the Christian people, whom the Jews attacked at every opportunity, as the teachings of the Talmud reflect, and as history shows, especially the history of Communism shows –ed.). They did not persecute the Jews. They did not treat them as enemies, because that would have been repugnant to charity, but they treated them as foreigners, that is to say, as citizens of another nation. They did not attack Jewish worship, or Jewish laws, or Jewish customs; on the contrary, they protected the free exercise of them, but on the condition that the Jews respected the Christian organization of the State and did not attempt to undermine it. Jewish perfidy was an object of distrust, and to those Jews who disguised themselves in order to penetrate into the Christian State and destroy it, the chastisement of traitors was justly meted out” (the Marquis De La Tour du Pin, quoted by Fr. Denis Fahey, C.S.Sp., D.D., Ph.D., B.A., Professor of Philosophy and History, Holy Ghost Missionary College, Dublin, Ireland, in “The Mystical Body of Christ & The Reorganization of Society”, Ch. 8: P. 175, 164. Imprimatur: 1943 (Ecclesiastical Approbation).

Catholics, contrary to the lies of B’nai B’rith, helped Jews to escape from Hitler, even while Jewish border guards were turning Catholics back to certain death in Communist (Jewish run) countries during W.W.II. Not only that, but “Operation Keelhaul” was when Masonic Governments and Allied forces rounded up millions of innocent Catholic men, women and children who had escaped from Communist hells in the U.S.S.R. and Eastern Europe, and sent them back to certain death. Some were indeed Russian Cossacks who had defected from Stalin and joined Hitler’s army, but they were relatively few. Most of “Operation Keelhaul’s” victims were regular folks from Eastern European countries and Russia.

I am not trying to incite hatred for the Jews by the following, as they incite hatred of Catholics by continually upbraiding us with recent court cases involving child sexual abuse, inferring that it is a Catholic thing, which it is not. The following remarks are necessary to bring a little perspective to the situation. If they can reproach us with what shows evidence of being the product of a conspiracy, a Catholic like me can respond to them: It’s interesting that one never hears of child sexual abuse cases concerning Jews or the Synagogue, considering the following texts of the Talmud which Benjamin Freedman refers to in the above quoted book. If he was called upon to give briefings to high level U.S. military intelligence staff at the Pentagon, as the above quote from his book says, he must have been a respected member of the Jewish Community and in a position to know these things. According to him and other sources not connected to him, the religious code of the Synagogue, The Talmud, sanctions child sexual abuse: San. 55b-55a, 69b, Kethuboth 11a-11b, Babha Kama 113a, 113b, Kallah 1b, p. 18, Schabboth Hagahoth 6d, Zohar I, 160a, etc. “ This official unabridged translation of the Talmud into English with the official footnotes was printed in London in 1935 by the Soncino Press. It has been always referred to as the Soncino Edition of the Talmud.” (Facts are facts, P. 28-36, by Benjamin Freedman). The fact that only a sanitized version of the Talmud for public consumption can be found in public libraries and that the Jews have a culture of secrecy concerning the inner workings of their Community, which the offense-defense outcries of ``Anti-Semitism`` against any unauthorized criticism is a part of, makes such disclosures admit of plausible denial. However, one can see that there could be some foundation to them, from Church sanctions in the past forbidding Christians to be employed by Jews, or to have them as teachers and governesses because: “They commit abominations of a kind (with them) which it rather becomes you to punish than to explain.” (The Talmud Unmasked, P. 90, by Fr. I. B. Pranitis, with Ecclesiastical approbation, 1892) wrote Pope Innocent III to the King of France confirming the edicts of the Lateran Council.
The author says that Jesus drew his teachings from this book. Nothing could be farther from the truth. There is nothing of these things in the strictly Biblical teachings of Jesus Christ. Christianity, including the works of the Fathers and the Councils, is strictly Biblical, and has no tolerance for child abuse. According to the doctrine of Jesus Christ one may not do wrong for any reason: “He that shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in Me, it were better for him that a millstone should be hanged about his neck, and that he be drowned in the depth of the sea. Woe to the world because of scandals. For it must needs be that scandals come: but nevertheless woe to that man by whom the scandal cometh” (Matt. 18: 6,7). See also: Rom. 3: 8, & 6: 15,16 & Eph.5: 3-13, & “He hath commanded no man to do wickedly, and He hath given no man license to sin” (Ecclesiasticus 15: 21).

People do what they believe, and they believe what they do. When Catholics act contrary to the teachings of Catholicism, it will most often be found that, unless they are infiltrators professing the faith hypocritically, they do not really believe or know their faith. When enemies try to make Catholics give up the Catholic faith, they try to make them sin, because when the believing Catholic loses his morals, he loses his faith. Likewise, they try to discredit Catholicism by exploiting his ignorance, so that they can dispose him to sin, because as long as his faith is strong, his morals are safe. The same is not so for the Synagogue, because the primary code for the Synagogue is not faith and the Bible, but the Talmud and the Kaballah. The former is a code devised by Rabbi’s, and which the Synagogue puts above the Scriptures, and the Kaballah, which is: “The sacred books of black magic of orthodox Judaism which form a large part of the basis of the western secret societies, from Rosicrucianism to Freemasonry and the O.T.O.  Kabbalism is itself derived from the sorcery of ancient Babylon and Babylon’s progenitor, Pharonic Egypt” (Blood On The Altar, Glossary, P. 146, by Craig Heimbichner).

 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
"a radical call to conversion, the absolute gravity of history, dangers threatening the life and faith of the Christian, and therefore, the world. And also the importance of the 'last times'..." (Cardinal Ratzinger to Vittorio Messori in 1984 about The Third Secret of Fatima (still untold. The text adduced in 2000 is not credible).

"The Papal Condemnations of Freemasonry are so severe and sweeping in their tenor, as to be quite unique in the history of Church legislation. During the last two centuries, Freemasonry has been expressly anathematized by at least ten different Popes, and condemned directly or indirectly by almost every Pontiff that sat on the chair of St. Peter. The Popes charge the Freemasons with occult criminal activities, with "shameful deeds", with worshipping Satan himself ..., with infamy, blasphemy, sacrilege, with the most abominable heresies of former times; with the systematic practice of assassination, with treason against the state, with anarchical and revolutionary principles, with favoring Bolshevism, with corrupting and perverting the minds of youth, with shameful hypocrisy and lying, by means of which, Freemasons strive to hide their wickedness under a cloak of probity and respectability, while in reality they are a very synagogue of Satan (Apoc. 3: 9) whose direct aim and object is the complete destruction of Christianity" (Apologea Pro Vita Mea Sua, p. 12, Freemasonry, by Fr. Denis Fahey C.S.Sp., D.D., Ph.D., B.A., Professor of Philosophy and Church History, Holy Ghost Missionary College, Kimmage, Dublin, Ireland).

¨  "Let us remember that Christianism and Freemasonry are essentially incompatible... to become united with one means being divorced from the other..." (Pope Leo XIII, Letter to the Italian People, from "Papacy and Freemasonry" by Msgr. Jouin, with direct approbation of two Popes).

¨  "The City of Good and the City of Evil are separate, each seeking to rule in the world... Freemasonic or known under some other denomination. We condemn and forbid them by this Our present Constitution, which is to be considered valid forever (Pope Clement XII, "In Eminenti"). Pope Benedict XIV March 16, 1751 published the Constitution "Providas" in which he inserted in full "In Eminenti" ... to make it very evident that the condemnation of Freemasonry is irrevocable" (Papacy and Freemasonry by Msgr. Jouin, P. 2-4, 6,7. With Papal Approbation).

¨  “The Roman Pontiffs Our predecessors, in their incessant watchfulness over the safety of the Christian people, were prompt in detecting the presence and purpose of this capital enemy immediately it sprang into the light instead of hiding as a dark conspiracy; and moreover they took occasion with true foresight to give, as it were, the alarm, and to admonish both princes and nations to stand on their guard, and not allow themselves to be caught by the devices and snares laid out to deceive them. The first warning of the danger was given by Clement XII in the year 1738, and his Constitution was confirmed and renewed by Benedict XIV. Pius VII followed the same path; and Leo XII, by his Apostolic Constitution, “Quo Graviora” put together the acts and decrees of former Pontiffs on the subject, and ratified and confirmed them forever. In the same sense spoke Pius VIII, Gregory XVI, and many times over Pius IX”. (Pope Leo XIII in “On Freemasonry” or Humanum Genus).

¨    "The partisans of evil seem to be combining together, and to be struggling with united vehemence, led on or assisted by that strongly organized and widespread association called the Freemasons. No longer making any secret of their purposes, they are now boldly rising up against God Himself... they have begun to exercise great weight in the government of states... they are prepared to shake the foundations of empires, to harass the rulers of state, to accuse, to cast them out, as often as they appear to govern otherwise than as they themselves would have wished. In like manner, they have by flattery deluded the people. Our best and firmest hope of a remedy is in the power of that Divine religion which the Freemasons hate in proportion to their fear of it... Therefore, whatsoever the Roman Pontiffs, Our predecessors, have decreed for the purpose of opposing the undertakings and endeavors of the Masonic sect, and what they have enacted to withdraw men from societies of this kind, We ratify and confirm it all by Our Apostolic authority... We pray and beseech you, venerable brethren, to join your efforts to Ours, and earnestly strive for the extirpation of that foul plague... You have to defend the glory of God and the salvation of your neighbour... We wish it to be your rule first of all to tear away the mask from Freemasonry... to instruct people as to the artifices used by societies of this kind... and the depravity of their opinions and the wickedness of their acts... The result of this will be that the minds of men will be made sound by instruction, and will be protected against many forms of error and inducements to wickedness... Pope Leo XII said: "Let us cease to even call ourselves Christians if we have begun to tremble and the threats and traps of perverts" ("Quo Graviora".); and in mourning and supplication stretch out our hands in prayer to God... Let us take as our intercessor the Virgin Mary, Mother of God, so that she, who at the moment of her conception overcame Satan, may show her power over these evil sects, in which is revived the contumacious spirit of the demon" (Pope Leo XIII, "On Freemasonry" from "A Light In The Heavens" From Tan Books).

¨ "A certain sect of darkness is engaged, a sect which human society these many years carries within itself and which like a deadly poison destroys its happiness, it's fecundity, and it's life. Abiding personification of the revolution, it constitutes a sort of retrogressive society whose object is to exercise an occult suzerainty over the established order and whose whole purpose is to make war against God and against His Church. There is no need of naming it, for all will recognise in these traits the society of Freemasons, of which We have already spoken in Our encyclical On Freemasonry... embracing in its far-reaching grasp almost all nations (by 1902 -ed.), and uniting itself to other sects which it's secret influence puts in motion... it has succeeded in entering all classes of society, and forms an invisible and irresponsible state existing within the legitimate state. Full of the spirit of Satan who, according to the words of the Apostle, knows how to transform himself at need into an angel of light" (Apostolical Letter, March 19, 1902, from "A Light In The Heavens" From Tan Books, 1-800-437-5876).
Pope Pius VII in "Traditi": "Their law is untruth, their cult is turpitude, their God is the Devil".
Pope Leo XIII agreed in "Human Genus", (On Freemasonry). In this Pope's encyclical "Quod Apostolici Muneris" he showed that Freemasonry is the origin of so-called Communism, Socialism, and the other atheistic and Humanistic ideologies whose differences are merely utilitarian.

¨  "It is remarkable that after a 3 month investigation by one of the major newspapers, the 21 part series made no mention of the close bond between the Klan and Freemasonry. After all, most of the Klans leaders were Freemasons … It was founded by Albert Pike. “Dr. Hiram Evans who succeeded Simmons (another Mason) as Imperial Wizard, for many years was recognized as one of the most active men in Freemasonry, and is a 32nd degree Knight Commander of the Court of Honor, who had been devoting almost his entire time to Scottish Rite Masonry at the time the Klan was organized. Israel Zangwill, a prominent London author, said he was told by a Jewish Rabbi that Dr. Evans inducted him into the 32nd degree of the Masonic order" (p. 95, "Behind The Lodge Door", by Paul Fisher, from Tan Books).

¨  Pope Pius XI described: "Thus on May 12, 1936, speaking to journalists, he said: 'The primary peril... the most widespread, is certainly Communism under all its forms,  for it threatens everything, takes possession of everything, and infiltrates everywhere, overtly and secretly" ("The Whole Truth About Fatima", Vol. 2, P. 637-8, Ch. 9: Pt.2, by Fr. M. de la Sainte Trinite. From: The Fatima Crusader: Call: 1-800-263-8160).

¨  "There is no doubt that the Masonic activity against the Catholic Church is no more than the continuation of the war against Christ practiced by the Synagogue for the last 1900 years rendered possible by the help of secrecy, deceit and hypocrisy adjusted to the circumstances of the Christian world… Read the Gospel and you will see, in Jewish espionage, in their captious questions, in their hypocritical attacks, clothed with the veil of the pretended piety of the Pharisees, in their efforts to make Him hated before the people – Christ who was their greatest glory and their wonderful benefactor; in the use of gold to corrupt an Apostle, in the formation of public opinion against Christ, in the preference of Barrabas (murderer and thief –ed.) in the fury and false accusations with which they tried to bury the memory of Christ in shame; in the constant opposition, many times bloody, against the preaching of the Apostles, etc. In all this you will see the same that Masonry practices today… In the service of the same Judaism”. (“The Mystery of Freemasonry unveiled”, P.206: 135, Pt. 4: Ch: 3, by Cardinal Caro of Chile, Archbishop of Santiago, 1957).

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 “There are no uprisings or revolutions except those that are planned and rehearsed… revolutions are not spontaneous uprisings, but carefully planned minority actions. There have been no popular revolutions” (Secret Societies & The Kingship of Christ, P. 27, by Fr. Denis Fahey, C.S.Sp., B.A., Ph.D., D.D., Professor of History and Philosophy, Holy Ghost Missionary College, Dublin, Ireland).

The History

“Nations Will Be Annihlated” (Our Lady of Fatima, 1917): It is evident that before the 1960s, and especially before W.W.II, that the West and much of the East had a Christian World Order. However, since the 1500s, Protestantism liquidated large Catholic populations in England and Ireland, and severed many Christians from the centre of unity, which is the Papacy. A divided Christendom was possible to conquer. In 1789 the French Revolution overturned the French Monarchy upon which rested the security of the common people (contrary to what the Masonic rewritten histories said) and the altar. The leadership of the revolution under Robespierre did not meet their projected quota of liquidating 15,000,000 French citizens out of the 25,000,000 population of France in 1789. “What must have been the death toll for all of France during the Terror? Prudhomme places it at no less than                                                                                               1,025,711…”  (The French Revolution, P. 423, 428, 419: Ch. “The Reign of Terror”, by Nesta Webster). From Omni CBC Publications (661) 274-2240). A window into the French Revolution: “An eye-witness related that on one occasion he saw the corpses of no less than seventy-five girls ages 16-18 who had been shot down by the German legion. Carrier entertained a peculiar hatred for children – ‘they are whelps’ he said, ‘they must be destroyed,’ and he gave orders that they must be butchered without mercy. The details of these massacres far surpass in horror anything that took place in Paris during the height of the Reign of Terror; there young children at least were spared, but at Nantes they perished miserably in hundreds. The annals of savagery show nothing more revolting – poor little peasant boys and girls thrust beneath the blade of the guillotine, mutilated because they were too small to fit the fatal plank; 500 driven all at once into a field outside the city and shot down, clubbed and sabred by the assassins round whose knees they clung, weeping and crying out for mercy. Finally the executioner grew weary of the slaughter… even the fusillades proved too slow a method of extermination, and it was then that Carrier embarked on the scheme which has for all time rendered his name infamous – the noyades, or wholesale drowning in the Loire. The first experiment was on 90 old priests… This delighted Carrier – “’I have never laughed so much,’ he declared, ‘as when I saw the faces those – made as they died.’ This incident when reported to the Convention, met with no remonstrance; Herault de Sechelles, in fact, wrote to Carrier congratulating him on ‘his energy and talent in the art of revolution,’ whilst Robespierre, we know, heartily approved. Carrier, thus encouraged, set to work on a larger scale. The cargo-load of gangrene in the form of clergy had proved but a prelude; now ‘the people’ were to provide the victims. So through bitter December nights crowds of poor women… some clasping babies to their breasts, some leading little children by the hand, were driven out into the cold darkness, they knew not whither; only when they found themselves on the banks of the river where the great barges waited the hideous truth dawned on them… Many holding their babies closer refused to give them up to strangers, and bore them with them in their arms down beneath the dark waters of the Loire. These perhaps were the wisest, for many of those poor children, whom stronger-minded mothers had placed in sympathetic arms held out to them, were seized by Carriers agents and herded into that ghastly Entrepot, or prison of the City, to die of cold or pestilence” (Ibid. P. 418, 419).
The Russian revolution in 1917: “In 1918, Zinoviev, the intimate friend of Lenin… wrote: ‘… of the Russian people 90,000,000 are under the power of the Soviets. The rest? We will exterminate them. It must be understood that the empire of the Czars  numbered almost 180,000,000 souls. The war and the cruelty of the State had reduced the population to 130,000,000. Well, there were still 40,000,000 too many! In 1918 one could read the following words in the  official organ of the Soviet Petrograd: ‘We will render our hearts cruel, harsh, without pity. We will open the dams of this bloody sea.  Without pity, without mercy, we will kill our enemies by the thousands. We will drown them in their own blood’. Then came the famine in 1922 which claimed 10,000,000 victims (The Whole Truth About Fatima, Vol. 2, Pt. 2: Ch. 5: P. 453-4, by Frere Michel De La Sainte Trinite, 1989). A revolution in Portugal prior to that which also murdered the Monarchy and much of the Portugese population. During the Marian apparition at Fatima, 1917, the child seers were persecuted by the Masonic authorities there.  Spain 1936, see “The Truth About The Spanish Civil War”, ahead. Mexico: In 1926 the Catholic people of Mexico organized an armed uprising to defend themselves and their homeland against the foreign (U.S.) backed Socialist revolution forcing a Masonic government on the Catholic people of Mexico against their will. That’s like forcing a Nazi government on the State of Israel. The heroic Mexican resistance was called: “The Christeros”. Pope Pius XI learned his lesson the hard way about how far one can trust agreements made with such people, and the naivety of laying down arms and seeking a peaceful solution with Masonic powers such as Communism or Socialism. The Christeros were winning when Pope Pius XI told them to lay down their arms on the assurances the Pope received from the Calles government. Instead, the Calles government mercilessly rounded up and liquidated the Christeros, and flaunted their severed heads to the cameras. This Pope did not make the same mistake years later in regards to the resistance of General Franco to the Communist invasion of Spain in 1936, which he backed and encouraged wholeheartedly. The following is a sample of how the Calles government treated the Mexican people: “Typical of hundreds of recorded instances was the tearing out of the tongues of unarmed youths at Leon before execution, because, when lined up to be shot, they cried in unison, ‘Viva Christo Rey’. Other prominent young men at Angel had the skin pulled off their heads and fingers for similar witness to Christ the King before being butchered; and General Flores and his captured companions were hung up by the thumbs while their flesh was slashed with razors. The multiplication of such savageries, with the general burnings and rapings that marked the march of the Callistas, instead of terrorizing stimulated the Christeros… The outrages on villages and ranches had raised the entire populace against Calles in defense of their lands and homes… under the battle cry, ‘God, Fatherland, Liberty’.” (No God Next Door, Ch. 8, P. 120, by Fr. Michael Kenney, S.J., Imprimatur, 1935). From Omni CBC Books. Before the Masonic revolution of 1810, Mexico was a thriving Catholic civilization flourishing with culture, arts, education, and national prosperity. But after the revolution Mexico was reduced to an abjectly poor country with a Catholic population ruled over against its will by a despotic Anticatholic single party. In recent years they got more than one party, but since they are all controlled by a single source that now seems content to let the drug cartels take the lead, that is just window dressing. Well educated youths raised in the Catholic culture of Mexico were yelling: “Long live Christ the King”, unlike the uneducated youths of today which would be yelling only obscenities. Eastern Europe: see “Socialist Government in the Balkans” ahead. Italy was kept in continual convulsions by Masonic revolutionaries throughout the 19th century, which imprisoned Pope Pius VII, and later drove Pope Pius IX from the Vatican, and in the reign of Pope Leo XIII Freemasons marched through Rome to the Vatican with a banner depicting Satan trampling St. Michael the Archangel underfoot yelling up at the Popes window, that Satan would rule from Vatican Hill (the plan to take over the Church). During W.W.II, while the world was looking the other way, there was a systematic genocide of Catholic populations in the Eastern European nations invaded by the Soviets. Thus, the Iron Curtain, and people clamouring to escape to the “free world”. 2 to 5 million Christians who escaped to Western Europe, were shipped back to certain death, by U.S., British, and other Allied soldiers, who were helping the Communists, to the horror and dismay of democratic Eastern Christians. It was called “Operation Keelhaul”. Pope Pius XI complained about the silence of the world media about these horrors, who were involved in a cover-up and obviously part of this conspiracy, he called it, in his well-known and still available encyclical: “Atheistic Communism”. In Africa, the Rwanda genocide of the devout Catholic Tutsi’s in the 1990s. The genocide of the Boers in 1899. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the only two Catholic cities in Japan, and the American Government is Masonic. If it was war and not Masonic Anti-Catholicism, then why did the Americans not target Tokyo and locations proximate to the powerbrokers and war-mongers?  
In Armenia 1915-1917, the genocide there allowed Catholics to live if they’d embrace Islam: “Estimates by Professor R. J. Rummel, a political scientist at the University of Hawaii and respected genocide scholar, place the number killed at 1.4 million. Today, the government of Turkey denies there was any “genocide” and argues that Armenians also killed Turks during the war. The latter point is true. However, many of the Turks were killed by Armenian irregulars fighting with the Russians during the war. Rummel estimates that those Armenians killed about 75,000 Turks. For three years now, the Armenian National Committee of America and many other Armenian groups have tried to get President Bush to recognize what happened in Armenia as ‘genocide’… Bush in fact pledged to do so when he campaigned for president in 2000. But he has not kept the pledge. Every April 24 he fudges the language to not upset the Turkish government… Bush referred to the killing of Armenians as a ‘tragedy’ that somehow happened… The British government has also consistently refused to recognize the events in 1915 as genocide stating that there is insufficient evidence… The evidence, of course, is overwhelming. The Armenian genocide is almost as well documented as the Nazi holocaust. But focusing attention on the Muslim slaughter of Christians by an ally of Bush and Blair is politically incorrect.” (The Remnant, P. 5, Sept. 15, 2003).  Both Islam and Freemasonry exterminate true Catholics. Masonic sources do not persecute or slander Islam, as they persecute and slander Catholicism. In fact, Masonic sources extol Islam and often lie in doing so. However, Masonic authorities and Islam often do fight one another, like Pilate, Herod, and the Sanhedrin did at the time of Christ, but like those authorities then, Islam and Masonic powers are at one, in persecuting and exterminating Christianity. That is because Satan does not cast out Satan. Satan only casts out God, and God casts out Satan in His own good time. I only hope and pray that we living through the “Sodom and Egypt” (Apoc. 11: 8) of these days don’t have to wait as long as the Hebrews waited until Moses sent by God delivered them from Egypt, which was 400 years.
                                                        +                                  +                                +

“And they had over them a king, the angel of the bottomless pit; whose name in Hebrew is Abaddon, and in Greek Apollyon; in Latin Exterminans.” (Apocalypse 9: 11). The only other place in Sacred Scripture that a name and title is given in Hebrew, Latin and Greek is in the Gospels regarding the Crucifixion and sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the Cross to save mankind from their sins, that is, from the consequences of sin, in John 19: 19, 20, Luke 23: 38; “And Pilate wrote a title also, and he put it upon the Cross. And the writing was: JESUS OF NAZERETH, KING OF THE JEWS. This title therefore, many of the Jews did read: because the place where Jesus was crucified was nigh to the city: and it was written in Hebrew, in Greek, and in Latin.” (Jn. 19: 19, 20). If mankind will not be ruled by God, it will be ruled by tyrants, if it will not be saved, it will be destroyed. “For the time is, that judgment should begin at the house of God. And if first at us, what shall be the end of others that believe not the Gospel of God? (1 Peter 4: 17). If the punishments of God in this life, which are always remedial and unto mercy, be so unendurable, what shall it be to those who are condemned to eternal Hellfire after death where there is no more hope?  
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Where Terrorism Began  The following atrocities were not isolated incidents, they are typical of the bloodiness and cruelty with which true Catholic’s have been persecuted throughout history. Crucified in one way or another like their Lord who foretold that this would be the case.

"When the Rohrburg Commission of enquiry entered Kiev... in August 1919, it found the execution hall of the Cheka in the following state: 'All the cement floor of the great garage, was flooded with blood... it formed a layer of several inches: it was a horrible mixture of brains, of pieces of skull, of tufts of hair, and other remains. All the walls riddled by thousands of bullets were bespattered with blood... A gutter 25 cm. wide by 25 cm. deep, and about 10 metres long, ran from the centre of the garage to a subterranean drain. This gutter along it's whole length was full to the top with blood. Usually, as soon as the massacre had taken place, the bodies were conveyed out of town in motor lorries... we found in the corner of the garage, another grave that was older containing about 80 bodies. Here we discovered on the bodies traces of cruelty and mutilation the most varied and unimaginable. Some were disemboweled, others had limbs chopped off, some were literally hacked to pieces. Some had their eyes put out, and the head face and neck and trunk covered with deep wounds. Further on we found a corpse with a wedge driven into the chest. Some had no tongues. In the corner of the grave we discovered a certain quantity of arms and legs'... Professor Sarolea gives in "The Scotsman" 7th Nov. 1923, the following  figures: 28 bishops, 1219 priests, 6000 professionals and teachers, 9000 doctors, 54,000 officers, 260,000 soldiers, 70,000 policemen, 12,950 property owners, 535,290 members of the intellectual and liberal professions, 193,290 workmen, 618,000 pesant’s. The Commission of enquiry at Denikin on Bolshevist proceedings 1918-1919, in an account of "The Red Terror" computed 1,700,000 victims... A theoretical computation made by Ev. Komnin of Roul 1923: ...it is possible to establish the modest figure of 5 victims per day, which multiplied by 1000 tribunals, gives 5,000, and about a million and a half per annum...  Hostages taken from all social classes. These are held responsible for any anti-Bolshevist movements - revolts, The White Army, strikes, refusal of a village to give its harvest etc., - and are immediately executed. Thus, for the assassination of the Jew Ouritzky, a member of the extraordinary commission of Petrograd, several thousands of them were put to death... Thus I have photographs taken at Kharkoff, in the presence of Allied Missions, after the Reds abandoned the town... Bodies of workmen taken as hostages from a factory which went on strike. One had his eyes burnt, his lips and nose cut off; the other two had their hands cut off. The bodies of hostages S. Afaniasouk and P. Prokpovitch, small landed proprietors, were scalped by their executioners. Afaniasouk shows numerous burns caused by a white hot sword blade. The body of M. Bobroff, a former officer, had his tongue and one hand cut off and skin torn from his left leg. Human skin torn from the hands of several victims by means of a metallic comb... (women were not spared either -ed.). Bodies of four peasant hostages with atrociously mutilated faces, the genital parts having been operated on by Chinese torturers in a manner unknown to European doctors in whose opinion the agony must have been dreadful. It is impossible to enumerate all the forms of savagery which "The Red Terror " took... at Voronege the victims were shut naked in a barrel studded with nails and rolled about. Their foreheads were branded with a red hot iron five pointed star. At Tsaritsin, their bones were sawed. At Kiev, the victim was shut up in a chest containing decomposing corpses: after firing shots over his head, his torturers told him he would be buried alive. The chest was buried and opened again when the interrogation of the victim proceeded... It is not surprising that many victims went mad" (Vicompte Poncins De Leon, "The Secret Powers Behind Revolution" p.149-153, Ch: "The Jews and Bolshevism"). Could some kind of conspiracy be why there is no Remembrance Day for these good natured, quiet-living people who never hurt anyone?

"He began to think of the things that would happen to him after the Thought Police took him away... To be killed was what you expected. But before death there was the routine confession that had to be gone through: the groveling on the floor, the screaming for mercy, the crack of broken bones, the smashed teeth, and the bloody clots of hair" (George Orwell, "1984", p. 86, ch.8: pt. 1).

Socialist Government in the Balkans: "To tell the whole story of the violent and fierce persecution of Catholics... since Tito came to power would take not one, but several large books. However, principal passages from three joint Pastoral Letters of the Bishops of Yugoslavia, March 1945, Sept. '45, and Sept. 1946, and a condensed survey of the Catholic Church in this Communist dominated country will suffice to expose the true nature of the "freedom of religion" that, according to Tito and his henchmen, at home and abroad, prevails in Yugoslavia: Joint Pastoral Letter of the Archbishops of Zagreb and Sarajevo, the Bishops of Banjaluka, Djakovo and Krizhevtzi. March 24, 1945: 'The enemies of the Catholic Church, being also the followers of materialistic Communism, which the entire Croat nation with one accord rejects, have in our Croatia exterminated with fire and sword priests and the more eminent of the faithful. Judging by their ferocious manner, it is readily apparent why they accuse all Bishops, priests and religious as war criminals; why they wish to foist totally false accusations of crime upon them. In the civilized world, not a single person will be found approving such fictitious and arbitrary accusations... The Catholic Bishops of Croatia are prepared and ready to have each individual case investigated by the representatives of other nations, and by an international commission. In this way, the charges of war criminality will be proved a lie, and simply a means of exterminating those who oppose and want no part of Communism... Thus, the truth will be known: how lies have been made the instrument of an ideology..'. " ("Archbishop Stepinac: The Man and his Case" by Count O'Brien of Thomond, Ph. D., LL.D., Pol. Sc. D. (hon.). Foreword by: Dr. Mc Quaid, D.D., Archbishop of Dublin, Ireland, 1947).
                                                                                                                                   
"For lo, Thy enemies have made a noise: they that hate Thee have lifted up the head. They have taken a malicious counsel against Thy people, and have consulted against Thy saints. They have said: Come let us destroy them, so that they be not a nation... for they have contrived with one consent: and have made a covenant together against Thee... Let them know that The Lord is Thy name: Thou alone art the Most High over all the earth" (Psalm 82: 3-6, 19).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Where America Got Uncle Sam 
"There is little use in retelling the story of duplicity and disgraceful trickery practiced by the Americans in robbing the Catholic Acadians of their land (in Nova Scotia - ed.). "Winslows Act", September 5, 1755, in driving 2,000 of these poor people at the point of a bayonet aboard British vessels... Husbands were separated from their wives and children. Children never saw their parents again. The ships that carried them to the American colonies left groups at many a port, and the little bands soon found that they were in the midst of a hostile folk whose hatred for their faith and their race soon dried up the springs of charity. Almost alone, the Quakers of Philadelphia, the Catholics of Maryland, and the Huguenots of South Carolina treated them with kindness... it was because the Acadians were "Popish Recusants" that they were made to suffer untold tortures. The newspapers of the day contain formal protests against the presence of these "Papists" in the provinces... When the religious freedom of The Treaty of Paris, 1763 came before the parliament. The Quebec Act became law in 1774. These eleven years saw an Anti-Catholic agitation in the American colonies that rose to almost a frenzy. "No Popery" became the watchword, and in thousands of sermons from Protestant pulpits... The popular view was that King George III, by assenting to the Quebec Act, that is, by granting freedom of worship to Catholics in the conquered territory of Canada, had thereby become a traitor to the coronation oath, and was secretly a "Papist"... Sept. 6, 1774, the famous Suffold County Resolutions were passed, and the tenth of these urged Americans "to take all possible measures" for their security against this new freedom granted to the Catholics of Canada  ...The noted English historian Cardinal Gasquet, published some years ago in the London "Tablet", several articles under the title: "The Price of Catholic Freedom in Canada". He declares that England by keeping her word with France lost the American colonies. The leading American historian of the Revolution, Van Tyne, holds that the well-known economic causes given in our text-books for the Revolution are not sufficient to explain the bitterness of the struggle, and he rates as the principal causes, religious bigotry, sectarian antipathy, and the influence of the Calvinist clergy. The Cardinals words merit repetition: "The American Revolution was not a movement for civil or religious liberty; its principal cause was the bigotry and rage of the American Puritan and Presbyterian ministers at the concession of full religious liberty and equality to Catholics of French Canada. The Taxation Acts were only a minor cause, or rather occasion, and the dispute could have been settled by Constitutional agitation without secession but for Puritan firebrands and the bigotry of the people". ("The Church in U.S. History, America's Debt to Catholics": Ch. 9: "Eve of the American Revolution", P. 44-47, Published by "Our Sunday Visitor" 1938. Imprimatur: Bishop John F. Noll, D.D., of Fort Wayne, Indiana).
How "Our Sunday Visitor" began: "Naturally the Catholic press fought Socialism, and Socialism fought back". Marvin Brown, formerly connected with Socialist propaganda, founded a newspaper called "The Menace" in Aurora, Missouri, "bigoted preachers all over the land got behind it and in a brief time there were more than one hundred men and women on the lecture platform capitalizing the wonderful opportunity which organized prejudice against the Church offered. Soon, sister sheets of "The Menace" spread everywhere. The Catholic laity were much embarrassed by these papers and the wicked charges they leveled against the Church, and clamored for a periodical of their own to answer these charges and serve as an antidote. The answer to this demand was the founding of "Our Sunday Visitor" in 1912, by Fr. John Noll, pastor at St. Mary’s Church in Huntington, Indiana". (As the above Imprimatur shows, the work of this good priest was approved, and he was made Bishop -ed.). "Our Sunday Visitor" carried from its very first issue, the subtitle: "The Harmonizer" and was a paper which was modeled in many respects after Bishop England's "Miscellany"... As "The Miscellany", "Our Sunday Visitor" was immediately understood as a courageous effort to place before the reading  public answers to the charges against the Church, and to place in Catholic and non-Catholic homes the true facts about Catholics and their faith. The National Catholic Welfare Conference News Service had not yet been organized, and Fr. Noll's paper was the only organ in the U. S. capable of combating the anti-Catholic movement... he was, through Our Sunday Visitor, able to put most of them out of existence by exposing the character of the men who published "the Menace" etc., and by offering a monetary reward for proof of any of the list of charges against Catholics and the Church" (Ibid. Ch. 36, P. 204-5).

"Maury's book is not worth quoting a second time, but the following description of the Klan’s progress may be given: ... Clarke rounded up a crew of Negro-haters, harlot floggers, Methodist and Baptist pastors, anti-Catholic monomaniacs, bootleggers, peanut politicians, dry agents and an indeterminate number of honest people. Evans, dentist, 33rd degree Mason, he-man, go-getter, dealer in polysyllabic English, led the order into state and national politics". "The Klan or the Black Legion will not be the last of these anti-Catholic movements in the United States. Citations from books on the subject by non-Catholics might be given to show that the Klan never had any real justification for it's existence, that it flourished by creating false issues, by magnifying hatred and prejudice, or by exploiting an exaggerated sense of patriotic duty". ("Our Sunday Visitor", "The Church in U.S. History..." published 1938, Ch. 35: The Ku Klux Klan: p. 200-1. Imprimatur: Bishop John F. Noll, D.D., of Fort Wayne, Indiana).

Where America Got Uncle Sam  "The Know-Nothing leaders had as their purpose the amalgamation into one political party of the various anti-Catholic organizations - Sons of the Sires, American Republicans, Order of United Americans, Sons of America, United American Mechanics, and others. The united group was called: "The Supreme Order of the Star-Spangled Banner", and was familiarly known as Sam". (Our Sunday Visitor Press: The Church in United States History, p.100, Ch. 19. (Ecclesiastical approbation: John F. Noll, D.D., Bishop of Fort Wayne). The Ku Klux Klan in 1915, was the offspring of Sam, founded 1858 or so (Ibid. Ch. 35, P. 195).

"Slavery under any form has in all ages found the Church of Christ arrayed against it, whether in Europe, Asia, America or Equatorial Africa. The Sovereign Pontiffs have always waged an incessant war against the iniquitous traffic and set the seal of condemnation on the enslavement of human beings. Those unfortunate creatures whose souls bore the imprint of the Eternal God, in common with those of the white and yellow races, yet considered inferior beings, were declared equal with their masters in the sight of the Maker, and therefore, entitled to be free. When the great civil strife of the United States broke out (Pope) Pius IX publicly expressed his sympathy with the side of the Union, and proclaimed that the success of the North meant the extinction of the slave trade on the North American Continent." ("The Life & Work of Pope Leo XIII", Ch. 30, P. 364, by Rev. J. McGovern, D.D., Endorsed by the entire North American Heirarchy, 1903, from MacGregor Publishing Co., Vancouver, B.C.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 A Case History: The Story Of Blessed Oliver Plunkett  
"The Reformation, from it's very outset, had plunder written on it's front, but as to Ireland, it was all plunder from the crown of it's head to the sole of it's foot. The horrible lynx-like tyrant (Queen Elizabeth I - ed.) could not watch each movement of the Catholics there as she did in England, she could not so harass them in detail; she could find there no means of executing her dreadful police, so she murdered them in masses". (The Protestant Reformation in England and in Ireland, P. 268, Ch. 11, by  William Cobbet, 1827, Preface by Cardinal Gasquet, D.D., O.S.B. from Tan Books 1-800-437-5876).

"When Charles I, the husband of a Catholic princess ascended the throne of England. The Irish Catholics hoped for some relief, but their hopes were shattered. For although Charles had promised and was willing to grant them some concessions: freedom of religion and security for their lands, his tolerance had to give way before the violence of Protestant bigotry. Confiscation of lands belonging to the Irish continued, as did their re-settlement with absentee English  landlords. Such long continued abuses finally provoked an open rebellion and a war". 1641-1652. "In 1644 the English Government proclaimed: No quarter shall be given to any Irishman, or to any Papist born in Ireland. In 1649 Cromwell and his plundering Puritan army landed in Ireland... which was followed by the indiscriminate massacre of all the inhabitants. Nearly half the population perished in the terrible struggles that followed. When the war was over, many hundreds of Irish boys and girls were sold into slavery. The sufferings of Irish priests and religious... defy description. To say Mass was an act of treason, and to be a priest was to be an enemy of the commonwealth. By the edict of 1653, all priests were commanded to leave Ireland under penalty of treason. Should any still be found on the Island after this..." Queen Elizabeth I decreed they were to be: "hanged, cut down while still alive, beheaded, quartered, and burned. The head was to be set on a spike and exposed in the most public place... In 1678, "a proclamation was issued ordering 'all Popish societies, convents, seminaries and schools to be immediately dissolved and closed, and all Mass houses and meetings for Popish services to be suppressed. It was the result of carrying out this edict that Oliver Plunkett, Archbishop of Armagh, and Patriarch of Ireland, died a martyrs death for the Faith at Tyburn on July 11, 1681..." At Rome "entering the Irish College in 1646, Oliver proved himself a good scholar and a hard worker and soon won the respect and friendship of both the students and teachers... Father Oliver followed the Oratorians example of working among the poor and unfortunate... while his nights were spent in prayer and study. So great was the impression his zeal and learning made, that a contemporary has left this description of him: 'It is incredible with what zeal he burned for the salvation of souls. In our house itself, and in the city, he devoted himself to devout exercises, frequently visiting the sanctuaries steeped in the blood of the martyrs, and ardently sighing for the opportunity of sacrificing himself for the salvation of Ireland... he frequented the hospitals and employed himself in the most abject ministrations, serving the poor to the edification and wonder of the very officials and assistants of the place... Such selfless devotion, such talents, and great firmness of character, could not go un-noticed by those in authority". He was made Professor in 1657, and lectured in the Roman College with great success in various branches of Theology for 12 years, and "acted as an agent for the Irish Bishops, a task for which his prudence and skill in handling men and situations well fitted him. In 1669, the Archbishop of Armagh died in exile. The Archbishop of Dublin wrote to the Pope begging him to appoint a worthy successor for this See, the first in command of the Catholic Church in Ireland, founded by St. Patrick. "Various prelates were suggested. but Pope Clement IX intervened decisively: 'Why do we spend time discussing the unknown merits of others, when we have in Rome a native of Ireland whose merits are known to us all and whose labours in the city have already added so many wreaths to the peerless glory of "The Island of Saints"? I constitute Oliver Plunkett Archbishop of Armagh and Primate of Ireland by my Apostolic Authority'.  Though kept a carefully guarded secret, when news of the selection of Plunkett for the See of Armagh did leak out to a few, it was received with delight. His fellow countrymen rejoiced, as they were longing to see such an important part of Gods flock in the hands of a pastor who feared no foe, and who would not abandon his flock like a hireling in the hour of danger... In the hall knelt the superior of the hospital his eyes alight with a strange knowledge: 'My Lord', he said slowly to his well-beloved friend: 'You are going to shed your blood for the Faith'. Stooping to embrace him, the Archbishop softly said: no trace of fear on his ascetic face: 'I am unworthy of so great a favor, but help me with your prayers, that this, my ardent wish be fulfilled'...
  
It was very necessary that this appointment be kept secret in those perilous days when bigotry and fanatical hatred of the Church prevailed in so many places, and spies were everywhere. For this reason Father Plunkett... was forced to travel to Belgium instead. There, in Ghent, in the private chapel of the Bishops Palace, on the feast of St. Andrew, Nov. 30, 1669, in a ceremony held behind closed doors, he received Episcopal consecration and became the Archbishop of Armagh... Once he told a friend in a letter: 'I was obliged to conceal myself by assuming the name of Captain Brown and wearing a sword, a wig, and two pistols'... The Archbishop finally reached Ireland, and took possession of his See on the feast of St. Patrick, March 17, 1670... The labour stretching out before him was arduous, enough to test all his physical and spiritual energy, all his intellectual and moral powers. It was a work of reconstruction... There were no longer great and beautiful churches... no schools where children could be taught to love God and grow up as good Catholics. Undaunted... he preached The Word in season and out of season, and administered the Sacraments in places where no priest had been seen for over 50 years, relieved the oppressed and poor, comforted the sick and dying, gathered the children together for instruction, put an end to many abuses and scandals which had crept in, and made himself all things to all men. This can be learned from a letter written by several of his vicars to The Eternal City: 'Since entering upon his office, Archbishop Plunkett has displayed unwearied activity, held councils, suspended the unworthy, instituted examinations for those preparing for the Priesthood, called the Jesuits to conduct schools, confirmed thousands of persons in seven dioceses amid storm and rain, and finally, won a number of nobles from a life of pillage and plunder, and saved thousands and thousands from physical and moral ruin'. The Primate himself, in a letter written to Rome, describes the Confirmations mentioned by his fellow vicars: 'I have confirmed during the past 4 years, 48,655 persons of whom I have kept a list, many of them being up to 60 years of age'.
...The just and fair-minded Berkeley was succeeded as Viceroy in 1672 by Essex... At once renewed persecution began to sweep away the material part of the good the Patriarch had effected. The schools were closed, and by 1673 all the bishops were ordered to leave the country. But the Archbishop of Armagh stood firm: 'They'll have to drag me to the ship with a halter around my neck" he wrote to the Pope, 'for I am resolved not to act like a hireling. We shall not forsake the sheep or the lambs'!... Disguised, using an assumed name, he went about his vast diocese, now hiding in bleak mountains, now offering Mass on wind and snow-swept hillsides or in dark caves, living from hand to mouth in poor huts, suffering from cold, fever, and hunger, fleeing from one dangerous hide-out to another. Yet at all times, he was the shepherd of his flock, offering Mass, administering the Sacraments, preparing students for the Priesthood, instructing the children. Writing at this time to a friend, he says simply: 'I sometimes find it difficult to procure even black bread, and the house where Bishop Brennan and I are, is of straw, and thatched in such a manner that from our beds we can see the stars... but we are determined rather to die of cold and hunger than to abandon our flocks... In 1674 a harsher law went into effect, all the bishops who had not left the country were to be hunted down and imprisoned... There were Judases among the flock who would not hesitate to betray their shepherd for a price. And the Patriarch of Ireland would bring a nice sum". The Oates plot began in 1678. "Macaulay, who is not noted for his partiality towards Catholicism refers to it as follows: 'This Titus Oates, a clergyman of the Church of England, had by his disorderly life, drawn upon himself the censure of his superiors and had been forced to leave his parish. He then began to lead an infamous and vagrant life. Having spent some time in English Catholic seminaries abroad (where he passed himself off as a Catholic), ... expelled from seminaries in both Spain and France... he constructed a hideous tale... about "a Popish plot" to murder the King of England, burn down the city of London and massacre all the Protestants. In these days of bigotry and hatred against the Church, his lying story was taken up and used by certain Protestant leaders in the English government as a weapon against prominent Catholics. The commotion of fear and fanaticism into which England was thrown by this Plot soon spread to Ireland... Throughout this year, Archbishop Plunkett was a fugitive, hotly pursued by spies and soldiers 'night and day', as he described it in a letter to Rome... he was also given kindly shelter by a Protestant family near Dundalk. Then in November news came that his uncle, the aged Bishop of Meath, who had looked after him in his boyhood, lay dying in Dublin. Forgetting his own safety, the Archbishop left his hiding place to assist his uncle in his last moments. Ten days later he was arrested in his place of concealment... The only crime with which he was then charged was that of being in the country contrary to the law which forbade Irish Bishops to remain in Ireland... Even though the jury was Protestant to a man, they condemned the obviously perjured witnesses against him, and threw out the bill in disgust. This should have meant his immediate release. Instead, the cunning Shaftesbury, an English nobleman.. was determined to obtain the death of the holy Archbishop... ordered him to be brought to England. There he was to appear before the King and Parliament. This Earl of Shaftsbury was a small man so given to trickery and double dealing that he was nicknamed: "Little Sincerity". King Charles had once called him to his face: 'The wickedest dog in all of England". 

He was ambitious for more power in the government when some leading Catholics, like the Duke of York, the Kings brother, should have been gotten out of the way. Shaftesbury managed to have the perjured witnesses brought to London and had them testify on oath before the King and Council that there was a universal conspiracy against the Crown in Ireland, of which Plunkett, the Archbishop of Armagh, was the chief promoter. At the end of October... the Archbishop was brought from Dublin to London for his trial before the grand jury... the absurd charges brought against him caused the jury, even though the city was full of 'no Popery' to refuse even to find a bill against him. This again, should have secured the Archbishops freedom. Instead, another jury was found, and in May 1681... as in the rigged trials held by Communists of our times, the Primate was allowed neither counsel to plead for him, nor witnesses for his defense... On June 8th, after only 15 minutes deliberation, "the jury" found the Archbishop guilty of high treason, and condemned him... to be hanged, drawn, and quartered at Tyburn. In a firm voice the Archbishop exclaimed: "Deo Gratias! Thanks be to God!"... The Holy See's efforts to release the Patriarch failed, for the weak King dared not now, as he remarked "pardon anyone"! The final verdict on this mockery of a trial of an obviously innocent man is made in one of the histories of England, which says of it: "A more shameful proceeding never disgraced any country".
It seems the historian forgot that other mockery of a trial of the Archbishop's innocent Master. "Behold I bring Him forth unto you that you may know I find no cause in Him... take Him you and crucify Him: for I find no cause in Him" (Jn. 19: 4,6), when they answered: "Crucify Him, crucify Him". "Will I crucify your King" said Pilate. They answered: "We have no King but Caesar!" (Jn. 19: 15). "Pilate seeing that he prevailed nothing, but that a tumult was made; taking water washed his hands before the people, saying: I am innocent of the blood of this just man; look you to it. And the whole people answering, said: His blood be upon us and upon our children!" (Matt. 27: 25):
"Whom He foreknew, He also predestinated to be made conformable to the image of His Son... and whom He predestinated He called. And whom He called, them He also justified. And whom He justified, them He also glorified" (Rom. 8: 29).       
July 11, 1681: "Along the route... there were huge numbers of spectators... to catch a glimpse of the "traitor". Though only 52 years old, the Patriarch of Armagh looked almost 70. The long imprisonment and the harsh treatment had weakened him... yet there was a peace and a sort of majesty about him... When they arrived at the last place of execution... unhesitatingly, he mounted the steps to the raised platform and from there spoke to the crowds for an hour in words of such forgiveness and charity that many were moved to tears. After this, he knelt and prayed for all his enemies, using the words of the first martyr St. Stephen: "O Lord, lay not this sin to their charge". Then he begged mercy for himself in the words of Psalm 50: "Have mercy on me, O Lord, according to thy great mercy, and according to the multitude of thy tender mercies forgive me my sins...". As he repeated the very dying words of Our Divine Lord Jesus on the Cross: "Into Thy hands I commend my spirit" (Luke 23: 46 from Psalm 30:6), "the bolt was drawn and his soul launched into eternity. The crowds did not remain to watch the gruesome spectacle of the drawing" that is, dragging the body, tied by the feet to a horse-drawn cart, usually while the person was still alive and conscious, through the cobblestone streets littered with horse dung, then disembowelling and quartering him or her before, the beheading ..."The crowd went away quietly, deeply impressed, many saying under their breath: "Surely, this was an innocent man!" Permission was obtained without difficulty... to collect the scattered members of his body and lay them to rest beside these other glorious Tyburn martyrs" ("Shepherd of the Shamrock Isle" from The Benedictine Convent of Perpetual Adoration, Clyde, Missouri, 1956).

Blessed Oliver Plunkett was beatified in 1920 by Pope Benedict XV. His relics and memory are preserved in his memorial Church in Drogheda, Ireland, and at Downside Abbey in England. Blessed Oliver Plunkett was the last of the Tyburn martyrs:   
Shortly after the death of Blessed Oliver Plunkett, Shaftsbury and Oates were thrown into prison.

The first, or one of the first of the Tyburn martyrs was John Houghton, Prior of the Charterhouse in London in 1535. "All who refused to take "The Oath of Supremacy", that is to say, who refused to become apostates, were considered and treated as traitors, and made to suffer death accompanied by every possible cruelty and indignity... Having refused to take the oath... he was dragged to Tyburn. He was scarcely suspended when the rope was cut, and he fell alive on to the ground. His clothes were then ripped off; his bowels were ripped up, his heart and entrails were torn from his body and flung into a fire; his head was cut from his body; the body was divided into quarters and parboiled; the quarters were then subdivided, and hung up in different parts of the city; and one arm was nailed to the wall over the entrance to the monastery... How different, alas, from the means the Catholic religion had been introduced by Pope Gregory and St. Austin (into England where it had made a golden age of 900 years that ended in this - ed.). (...The Protestant Reformation of England & Ireland, P. 65, Ch. 3, by William Cobbet, Preface by Cardinal  Gasquet D.D.).

St. Augustine was sent to England by Pope St. Gregory the Great after he became aware of the existence of England by seeing some English people in Rome. He thought they looked like angels, and he enquired about their origin. He wanted to evangelize such noble looking people himself, but because of his popularity, Rome was in an uproar when he tried to leave. Years later as Pope, he sent St. Augustine, who landed in England with a company of monks and priests, and requested an audience with King Alfred, who readily permitted him to set up centers of relief for the poor and the suffering, schools, and houses of prayer. The people flocked to them from all sides, and the rest is history:

From the 1500s; "It was death for a priest to come from abroad, death to harbour him, death for him to perform his functions in England, death to confess to him, there seemed to be an impossibility of preventing her (Queen Elizabeth I) from extirpating from the land that religion under which England had been so great and so happy for numerous ages, - that religion of charity and hospitality, that religion that made the name of pauper unknown, that religion which had built the churches and cathedrals (Westminster Abbey in London, originally belonged to a Benedictine monastery. An Abbey is a monastery founded by Royal Charter - ed.). which planted and reared the Universities, whose Professors had made Magna Charta and the Common Law, and who had performed all those glorious deeds in legislation and in arms which made England really the envy of the surrounding nations and the admiration of the world ... to teach the Catholic religion, to be taught it, to keep from her Church service, were all great crimes... the gallows, the gibbets, and the racks were in constant use, the jails and dungeons choking with victims. The punishment for keeping away from her Church was 20.00 Pounds (approx. $60.00) a lunar month, which of money of the present day was 250.00 Pounds (1827). Thousands upon thousands refused to go to her Church, and thus she sacked their thousands upon thousands of estates, for, here was, in money of this day, a fine of 3,250 Pounds a year... No Catholic or reputed Catholic had a moments security or peace" (Ibid. P. 282. Ch. 11). 
Death & Taxes   "The consequence of the "liberation" wrought by Freemasons in Italy is this: They clamored for representative institutions. All their revolutions were made under the pretext that these were not granted - the mass of Italian people... are as yet unenfranchised after quarter of a century of Masonic supremacy in the land. The Masons represented the lot of the poor as insupportable under the native princes. But under themselves, the poor man's condition, instead of being ameliorated, has been made unspeakably worse. He is positively ground down, in every little town of Italy, by insupportable exactions. His former burdens are increased fourfold - in many cases tenfold. To find money for all the extravagances of Masonic rule - to make fortunes for the top sawyers, and comfortable places for the rank and file of the sect, a system of taxation, the most elaborate, severe and searching ever yet invented to crush a nation, has been devised. The peasant's rent is raised by Masonic greed wherever a Mason becomes proprietor, as is often the case with confiscated Church lands (the church rented these lands to the poor for little - or nothing if the harvest was bad that year, or if illness caused unemployment -ed.). Land taxes cause rents to rise everywhere. The tenant must bear them. Then every article of the produce of his little holding is taxed as he approaches the city gates to sell it. At home his pig is taxed, his dog, if he can keep one, his fowl, his house, his fireplace, his window light, his scanty earnings, titulo servizio, all are specially, and for the poor, heavily taxed. The consequence of this is, that few Italians can, since Italy became "united", drink the wine they produce, or eat the wheat they grow. Meat, once in common use, is now as rare with them, as it used to be with the Irish. Milk or butter they hardly ever taste. Their food, often sadly insufficient, is reduced to pizzi, a kind of cake made of maize or Indian meal; and vegetables or fruit when in season. Their drink is plain water. They are happy when they can mix it with a little vinnacio, a liquid made after the grapes are pressed, and the wine drawn off, by pouring water on the refuse. Their homes are cheerless and miserable, their children left to live in ignorance, without schooling, employed in coarse labor, and clothed in rags. The Grand Duke of Tuscany had by wise and generous regulations placed hundreds, even thousands of these peasants, happy as independent farmers on their own lands. The crushing load of taxation has caused these to disappear, and their little holdings have been sold by auction to pay taxes, and have passed, of course, into the hands of speculators, generally Freemasons, who, when they become landlords, vie with the worst of their class in Ireland, in greed.

In the states of the Church, where the careful, most Christian and compassionate spirit and legislation of the vicar of Christ prevailed, the peasantry ate their own bread, drank their own wine, and were decently, even picturesquely clad, as all travelers know, before the "liberation" of the Masonic Piedmontese. Not a family was without a little hoard of savings for old age, and for the provision and placing in life of the young. Now, gaunt misery, even starvation is characteristic of these populations after only fifteen years of Masonic rule. The vast revenues of the Church are gone, none know whither. The nation is none the better of them, and the populace in their dire poverty, can no longer go to the convent gate, where before, the poor never asked for bread in vain. The religious, deprived of their possessions are severely repressed, have no longer food to give. They are fast disappearing, and the people already experience that the promises of Freemasonry, like the promises of their real author, are but apples of ashes, given to lure, to deceive and to destroy". ("Grand Orient Freemasonry Unmasked, The Hidden Power Behind Communism", Ch.20, P. 135,136, by Msgr. George Dhillon, Missionary Apostolic, imprimatured in the reign of Pope Leo XIII under the title "The War of Antichrist Against The Church and Christian Civilization". Pope Leo XIII was so impressed by this book, he had it printed and distributed at his own expense. From: Catholic Treasures, Ph: 1-800-257-4893).

"On the Cross, when the Old Law died, soon to be buried and a bearer of death, in order to give way to the New Testament of which Christ had chosen the Apostles as qualified ministers" (Pope Pius XII, "Mystici Corporis": 30). 

"Is this not expressed in an identical manner in the German: "Los Von Rom" or in the English "No Popery"? Mgr. Gay having been assigned by the Council of the Vatican the duty of writing: "A Memorandum On Secret Societies" gave the following striking definition of Freemasonry: "It is evident in a general way, this doctrine of Freemasonry... allows full play to the commission of outrageous perversion. Freemasonry is indeed the abyss of all errors, the well of perdition". This abyss of all errors is justly compared to the 'abysmal well' (Apoc. 9: 1-3) whose emanations darken the light of the sun and poison the air. It is this accursed sect whose perversion was stigmatized by Pope Pius IX when he named it: 'The Synagogue of Satan". Due to it's enormous extension and it's nowadays visible collusion with international Jewish finance. Freemasonry has indeed become "The Synagogue of Satan". As such, it provided funds for the Russian revolution. It carried Communism from East to West, took up the leadership of states and their governments... and in consequence, it is such a world power that... today (1930 –ed.), there are on earth only two great powers, viz: Judeo-Masonry in the service of world Jewry and the Church in the hands of St. Peters successor. These two powers are at war... as though fighting an endless duel, as is clearly expressed in the stone inscription of the Masonic Grand Orient and Supreme Council of France: "The fight taking place between Catholicism and Freemasonry is a fight to the very death, ceaseless and merciless". With such a rallying and definite line of action, one can positively affirm that Judeo-Masonry is the unique enemy of the Church. It can be detected in all anti-Catholic attacks against clergy or laity led either by Freemasons or by even Catholics whose faith has decreased due to either fear, passion, or self-interest" (Msgr. Jouin, "Papacy and Freemasonry" P. 2,3, 1930, With Papal Approbation).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Where Everyone Mattered And Had A Home "The thoughts of the industrious always bring forth abundance". "He that follows justice and mercy, shall find life, justice and glory" (Prov. 21: 5, 21). "The fruit of humility is the fear of the Lord, riches, glory, and life" (Prov. 22: 4).

"The Catholic Church included in it a great deal more than the teaching of religion and of practicing worship and administering the sacraments. It had a great deal to do with the welfare of the people. it provided, and amply provided for all the wants of the poor and the distressed... it contained a great body of land, proprietors whose revenues were distributed in various ways amongst the people at large, upon terms always singularly advantageous to the tenant. It was a great and powerful estate independent of both the aristocracy and the Crown, and naturally siding with the people. But above all things, it was a keeper of the poor, and a provider of hospitality... and held society together by ties of religion, rather than by the tramels and terrors of the law... from the 6th century to the 15th century, 900 years, England enjoyed what is known as the golden age of Christianity. In that golden age, life revolved around the Church, that is, the life of the common people revolved around the monastery in particular. The monasteries possessed land. This was divided up into medium sized farms... and leased to farmers on the most reasonable and secure terms. The farmer would produce each harvest a tithe of what he produced, as rent on land. If he produced little or nothing, he paid little or nothing. If he had a good harvest he gave the tithe. His tenure was of the most secure kind, for he did not deal with a personal landlord who could sell his land or pass it on to an erring heir. The farmer had his lease from the monastery, and was not the victim of any individual and his personal whim. The monks and nuns had vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience. The purpose and meaning of their lives were found in their dedication to the welfare and protection of the common people, because they saw it as Gods will to ensure a truly Christian state. This was the meaning and purpose of their vows. The monasteries looked after the poor, the sick, the widow, and the orphan. There was no need of state welfare, no need of state hospitals, orphanages, poorhouses, or schools. To find God in the needy was the purpose of their lives. This was allied to a life of prayer and sacrifice, without which it would not have been possible for them to live such unselfish lives. A modern day example can be given of the miracles that can be performed when such dedication is applied to the use of land. Over a hundred years ago, the Cistercians were granted a piece of land at the top of a mountain. It was as bare of edible grass as the shell of an egg, and it could only feed snipe and wild birds. Today it contains lush green pasture and tillage lands and produces the finest herds and crops in the country" (in County Waterford, Ireland).

"As time went on the rights of the ordinary people were guaranteed and reinforced by Magna Charta, The Charter of Checks and Balances, represented by the King, the Commons, and the Church. Magna Charta was drawn up by the Catholic Archbishop of Canterbury, and fully accepted by the King and Commons as the best guarantee of fair play for King and Commoner alike. The Church, concerned with no law but God's law, interpreted and handed down by the Pope, was truly the guardian of the common people. The people had proof of this in the martyrdom of St. Thomas A Beckett. Henry II had said: "Who will rid me of this troublesome priest?". What Henry really wanted was to be rid of the curbs Thomas was putting on the King in defense of the peoples rights. Henry, however, did not realize that the martyrdom of Thomas would serve to make the people aware of the importance of the Church in defense of their rights. They showed their awareness in their pilgrimages to the tomb of St. Thomas which often swelled to 50,000 at a time (there were no car's, busses, planes and trains in those days -ed.). In those 900 years, there was no such word as "pauper" in the English language. The word pauper had to be invented after the so-called reforms came which brought an end to the role of the Church as the guardian of the peoples rights. When King Henry VIII became head of the Church in England the most important element in the checks and balances of Magna Charta was eliminated and became fused with that of the King. Instead of there being three elements of checks and balances, there were now only two, and the most important - that which owed allegiance to God alone, was gone. As a result, except for a privileged few, England became one massive pauperized orphanage, with it's mother the Church, driven underground". ("Fatima and the Great Conspiracy" by Deidre Manifold From The Fatima Crusader: 1-800-263-8160).

“In order to begin the “Godly reformation”, that is to say, the work of plunder, the Viceregent set on foot the visitation of monasteries… The object was to find grounds of accusation against the monks and nuns. When we consider what the object was, and the character of the man to whom the work was committed, we may easily imagine what sort of men these deputies were… Think of a respectable, peaceful, harmless, pious family broken in upon, by a brace of burglars, with murder written on their scowling brows… who menaced the victims with charges of high treason, who wrote in their reports, not what was, but what their merciless employers wanted them to write… (Ch. 5, P. 118, 119)… women as well as men, who had committed no crime known to the laws, who had no crime regularly laid to their charge, who had no hearing or defense, a large part who had, within a year been declared by this same parliament to lead most Godly and useful lives, the whole of whose possessions were guaranteed to them by the Great Charter as much as the Kings crown was to him, and whose estates were enjoyed for the benefit of the poor… (Ch. 6, P. 130)… The monks and nuns, who had never dreamed of the possibility of such proceedings, who never had an idea that Magna Charta and all the laws of the land could be set aside in a moment, and whose recluse and peaceful lives rendered them wholly unfit to cope with at once crafty and desperate villainy, fell before these ruffians as chickens fall before a kite. The reports made by these villains met with no contradiction; the accused parties had no means of making a defense; there was no court for them to appear in; they dared not, even if they had the means, to offer a defense or make a complaint; for they had seen the horrible consequences, the burnings, the rippings up, of all those of their brethren who had ventured to whisper any dissent from the dogma or decree of the tyrant. The project was to despoil the people of their property” (The Protestant Reformation In England and Ireland, Ch. 5: 118, 119 & Ch. 6: P. 130, By William Cobbet, 1824. Preface by Cardinal Gasquet. From Tan Books, Ph. 1-800-437-5876). 

"Then shall the just answer Him saying: Lord, when did we see Thee hungry, and fed Thee... and when did we see Thee a stranger and took Thee in... or sick and in prison, and came to thee? And the King answering shall say to them: Amen, I say to you, as long as you did it to one of these My least brethren, you did it to Me. Then He shall say to them that shall be on His left hand: Depart from Me you cursed, into everlasting fire which was prepared for the Devil and his angels. For I was hungry, and you gave Me not to eat..." (Matt. 25: 31-46).

“In thy seed shall all the nations of the earth blessed, because thou hast obeyed My voice” (Gen. 22: 18).
 _________________________________________________________________________________

The Truth About The Spanish Civil War "From the beginning of 1936, the Pope and his Secretary of State, Cardinal Pacelli (later Pope Pius XII -ed.) had perceived the gravity of the situation. The destructive fury of the Reds against everything relating to God, to Christ and to the Church sufficiently demonstrated what Satanic hatred had spawned this revolution... the aging Pope, fully conscious of the peril which was now at the doors, was issuing continual warnings against Bolshevism. Thus on May 12, 1936, speaking to journalists, he said: 'The primary peril... the most widespread, is certainly Communism under all it's forms... for it threatens everything, takes possession of everything, and infiltrates everywhere, overtly and secretly'. Having denounced 'the unbelievable connivance, or at the very least, the silence and tolerance which are an inestimable advantage for the cause of evil, and which have the most disasterous consequences for the cause of good', the Pope continued: 'You will tell people, most beloved sons' that you have seen the common father of all the faithful, the Vicar of Christ profoundly preoccupied and afflicted by this immense peril threatening the world, and which is producing very grave devastation in several regions, and most especially, in the European world... you will tell people, most beloved sons, that the common Father does not cease to point out the peril, which... too many seem to ignore, or whose gravity and immensity they do not want to recognize" (P. 637,638) ... "We can estimate that 20,000 Churches were destroyed and looted... The number of priests assassinated is as high as 6,000 for the secular clergy alone... They were hunted down with dogs, they were followed across mountains, they were relentlessly tracked down in all possible hiding places. They were killed without trial, usually right on the spot, with no other reason than their social function as priests. This revolution was supremely cruel, the massacring took on form of horrible barbarism... over 3,000 lay people perished soley for their political ideas and particularly for their religious ones. At Madrid alone, during the first 3 months, more than 22,000 of these were executed". The Spanish Bishops said: "We do not believe that in the whole history of Christianity, and in so few weeks time, there has ever been such an explosion of hatred against Jesus Christ and His holy religion... we perhaps would not find one form of martyrdom not employed by the Communists, not excepting Crucifixion... The hatred against Jesus Christ and Our lady has reached the point of paroxym. One can imagine the hatred of Hell becoming incarnate in our unfortunate Communists by the hundreds of mutilated Crucifixes, by the representations of Our Lady profaned in bestial fashion... the forms of profanation have been so incredible they cannot be conceived of without presupposing Diabolic suggestion... This letter of the Spanish Episcopate had considerable reprecussions" ("The Whole Truth About Fatima", Vol. 2, The Secret and the Church, Pt.2: Ch.9, P. 650-652, by Frere Michel De La Sainte Trinite).

The Pope Publicly Blesses Franco's Crusade  Masonic historians liken General Franco to Hitler and Mussolini. But General Franco was not like them at all. The Pope was opposed to Hitler and Mussolini. Whereas the Pope blessed General Franco and supported him wholeheartedly, as did the entire Vatican and all the Catholic world, because Franco was a devout Catholic who defended his country and his people from something as bad or worse than Nazism, as the preceding articles show. Franco was not a racist, and he never oppressed any people! He and his soldiers only fought enemy troops. “Franco was not a Fascist… He saved Spain from the worst fate that could befall any nation in the 20th century – conquest by Communism – giving his people instead a generation and a half of peace, security, prosperity, and personal – if not political - freedom in which the Catholic faith was restored and flourished throughout the country.” (The Last Crusader, Ch. “Spring”, P. 40, by Warren Carroll, Ph. D., Founder of Christendom College, President and Professor of History in the 1980s). From: Angelus Press. Hitler and Franco were not the same thing, at all! Even George Orwell of “1984” fame, who fought for the Freemasons and Communists against the Catholic people of Spain in the Spanish war had this to say: "Franco was not strictly comparable with Hitler or Mussolini. His rising was a military mutiny backed up by the aristocracy and the Church, and in the main, especially at the beginning, it was an attempt not so much to impose Fascism as to restore feudalism" ("Homage To Catalonia", P. 48, Ch. 5, by George Orwell). General Franco had Fascists fighting on his side, but he was personally opposed to Facism. Franco was simply a Catholic fighting to defend Catholics.

“Mr. Arthur Bryant, who wrote the preface to the fully evidenced, and authenticated, report on ‘Communist Atrocities in Spain’ remarked on several occasions: ‘Soviet agents obtained such a control of the communications systems that only reports favorable to their cause got into the majority of the world’s newspapers, but, on the other hand, the most outrageous lies against the Franco forces were conjured up and given to the Press of the world without let or hindrance.’ Bryant was so disgusted with what he saw that he wrote: ‘No university lecturer, or anonymous B.B.C. commentator has told the just, compassionate, British people the truth…” about what was done to Catholics, “For no greater crime than that they were found to possess some religious emblem.” (Pawns In The Game, Ch. 15, P. 143, by William Guy Carr, Commander of the Royal Canadian Navy). The book was written 1950 or so. The author lived at the time of the events in question, and his sources were more fresh. Communists and Freemasons are one and the same alliance. The media is simply the mouthpiece of International Freemasonry, and it reflects their line on everything. This is a good example of the Masonic policy of lying, and making things up to suit their party line, as George Orwell also described Big Brother in his novel “1984.” He also wrote in “Homage To Catalonia”:
“Early in life I noticed that no event is ever reported correctly in a newspaper, but in Spain, for the first time, I saw newspaper reports which did not bear any relation to the facts, not even the relationship that is employed in an ordinary lie. I saw great battles reported where there had been no fighting, and complete silence where hundreds of men had been killed. I saw troops who had fought bravely denounced as cowards and traitors, and other who had never seen a shot fired  hailed as heroes of imaginary victories; and I saw newspapers in London retailing these lies and eager intellectuals building emotional superstructures over events that had never happened. I saw, in fact, history being written not in terms of what happened but of what ought to have happened according to various ‘party lines’.” (Homage To Catalonia, Looking Back On The Spanish War, P. 234). Orwell was on the side of the Communists, but it was not Franco’s side of the story that received the ear of the news media, as the foregoing quote from Arthur Bryant shows, but the propaganda of the Communists who held power until Franco defeated them.

“Prior to the July, 1936, the directors of the world revolutionary movement had literally flooded Madrid with agents. Moses Rosenberg arrived as Moscow’s ambassador to Madrid. Anteneff Avseenko arrived in Barcelona. Dimitrov arrived to personally conduct the religious persecutions planned to follow the Communist Coup. During the civil war Rosenberg ruled as Czar of Madrid. Avseenko assumed command of the Catalan Red Army. Rosenberg organized the Chekas (military tribunals not concerned with guilt for wrongdoing, but only with ferreting out good Catholics and putting them to death, as they did in the Russian Revolution) in Spain and saw that they carried out their work of spying out more and more victims. (Pawns in the Game, P. 141, By William Guy Carr).

"If, as in Mexico 1929, the Pope had attempted to find a compromise with the Reds and condemned the crusade, it would have been the end of Catholic Spain... The Spanish Bishops preach the crusade. Once the Pope had spoken, the Spanish Bishops were able to distribute pastoral letters which, by providing a theological and moral justification brought invaluable assistance to the nationalist movement". Sept. 30, 1936, the Bishop of Salamanca published a pastoral letter: "On The Two Cities". But it was especially Cardinal Goma, the Archbishop of Toledo, who became the spokesman for the Church in Spain. Nov. 1936, he furnished the most reasoned and complete justification for the Crusade. In December 1936 , the Cardinal was unofficially representing the Vatican in the provisional government of Franco. In his Christmas message" the Pope said: "A new warning, the gravest and most menacing there has ever been for the whole world, and principally for Europe and for Christian civilization, a terrifying revelation and presage, in its certitude and evidence of what is being prepared for Europe and for the whole world, if immediate and effective recourse is not had to a defense and a remedy"(P. 638-639) ... "At the outbreak of the hostilities, Largo Cabalero had concluded a secret treaty of alliance with the Jewish ambassador of the Soviets, Rosenberg... who with dozens of his Soviet agents, directed the Republican policy at Madrid. In Madrid, even before the International Brigades entered... The U.S.S.R. furnished arms, officers, and instructors. But the active complicity of the liberal and Masonic democracies also greatly assisted" the revolutionaries in Spain. "Already in 1936, with great foresight, General Franco denounced this collusion of International Masonry with Bolshevism ... in league against Catholic Spain... On orders from Geneva and brought by the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Freemason Barcia... in the propositions of non-intervention, the influence of Freemasonry is felt heavily" (P. 636, 637).
"The crusade against such formidable opposition forces was to last 30 months. It was a hard, heroic struggle. Franco conducted it as prudently as he did energetically. Thanks to the rapid and firm support of Rome and the Spanish Bishops, it ended in victory... On April 1, 1939, the Red Army was conquered, and the war against Bolshevism was over. Once more all over Spain, bells rang out, calling the faithful to prayer: 'An immense wave of fervor brought soldiers, former prisoners, and their families to the foot of the altar... the great Spanish cities returned from Stalin and Bakunin to St. Teresa of Avila, and St. Ignatius Loyola'." As for General Francisco Franco? "The following day, after a "Te Deum" at the Church of Santa Barbara, he laid down his sword before the altar, to thank God for having granted him the victory: "Lord, accept with kindness the efforts of this people which was always Thine, who with me, and in your name, heroically vanquished the enemy of truth in this century. Lord God, in your hands reside all right and all power: grant me Thine assistance to lead this people to the full liberty of Empire, for Thy glory, and that of Thy Church. Grant, Lord, that men may know that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the living God'." (P. 637 & 652, "The Whole Truth About Fatima", Vol. 2, The Secret and the Church Pt.2: Ch.9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  "It shall be in the latter days for a testimony forever. For it is a people that provokes to wrath, and lying children, children that will not hear the law of God. Who say... Behold not for us those things that are right; speak unto us pleasant things, see errors for us. Take away from me the way... let the Holy One of Israel cease from before us. Therefore thus said the Holy One of Israel: Because you have rejected this Word, and have trusted in oppression and tumult, and have leaned upon it. Therefore shall this iniquity be to you as a breach that falls... For thus said the Holy One of Israel, if you return and be quiet you shall be saved... therefore, the Lord waits that He may have mercy on you, and therefore, shall be exalted sparing you: because the Lord is the God of judgment: blessed are all they that wait for Him" (Isaias. 30: 8-18). 

“And they sought out all in iniquities, till vengeance came upon them, and put an end to all their sins.” (Ecclesiasticus 47: 31). “When they shall say, ‘peace and security’; and then shall sudden destruction come upon them, as the pains upon her that is with child, and they shall not escape”. (1 Thess. 5: 3).

The Three Days Darkness The Alternative To Fatima?
The terrifying scenario of The Three Days Darkness is prophecied both in Sacred Scripture, and by many Saints and seers authenticated by the Catholic Church. It is in keeping with Divine mercy that God would prefer that the sinner be converted and live, rather than the death of the sinner. Nevertheless, "the soul that sins, the same shall die" (Ezech.18: 20). "But if the wicked do penance for all his sins which he hath committed, and keep all My Commandments, and do judgment and justice, living he shall live and shall not die" (Ibid. 21). The message of Fatima is a call to conversion for the whole world, and may well be the endeavor of The Blessed Virgin to defeat Satan and the forces of evil by peaceful and merciful means, so that God does not have to clean up the world and the Church the way he did in the days of Noah, or in the days of Sodom and Gomorrah. The following are some examples of the prophecies concerning The Three Days of Darkness foretold in Sacred Scripture and in the words of the Saints:

"The great chastisement will come when carriages go without horses, and many accidents fill the world with woe. It will come when thoughts are flying around the earth in the twinkling of an eye. When long tunnels are made for horseless machines (the tunnel linking England to France -ed.), when men can fly in the air and ride under the sea, when ships are wholly made of metal, when fire and water great marvels do, when even the poor can read books, and many taxes are levied for war" (Mother Shipton, 16th century).

"God will punish the world when men have devised marvelous inventions that will lead them to forgetting God. They will have horseless carriages, and they will fly like birds. But they will laugh at the idea of God, thinking they are very clever. There will be signs from Heaven but men, in their pride, will laugh them off. Men indulge in voluptuousness, and lewd fashions will be seen" (Blessed Rembordt, 18th century).

"It will come when the Church authorities issue directives to promote a new cult, when priests are forbidden to celebrate in any other (Vatican II and the new Mass -ed.), when the higher positions in the Church are given to perjurers and hypocrites, when only renegades are admitted to occupy those positions" (Oba Prophecy).

"They must pray above all for the Church of darkness to leave Rome... I saw again that odd looking Church they were trying to build. There was nothing holy about it... People were kneeding bread in the crypt below... but it would not rise, nor did they receive the body of Our Lord, but only bread. Those who were in error through no fault of their own, and who piously and ardently longed for the body and blood of Christ were spiritually consoled, but not by their Communion. Then my guide Jesus said: 'This is Babel' (The Mass in many languages). ("The Life Of Ann Catherine Emmerich", P. 283, Vol. 2, by Rev. Carl E. Schmoeger, C.S.S.R. 1820, as quoted in "Catholic Prophecy", P. 116, by Yves Dupont), both from Tan Books.
On The Use Of Latin:  The prophecies of Oba, and that of Ann Catherine Emmerich obviously refers to the changes of Vatican II and the new Mass said in the common languages of all nations - “the Church of Darkness” and invalid before God. The true Catholic Mass of the Western or Latin Rite, is said in Latin, one of the three sacred languages. Besides being a sacred language, Latin does not change or evolve like most other languages do, therefore, it is perfect for preserving the same meaning and sense of Sacred Scripture and the Mass through the centuries, so that Gods message to us does not get lost in the translation. The move to modernize language in sacred sources comes from an Anti-Christ, Anti-Christian motive to do just that. “Every spirit that dissolveth Jesus, is not of God, and this is Antichrist.” (1 Jn. 4: 3). That was why the Church was reluctant to allow the Bible to be printed in “the vulgar tongue” in the Middle Ages. When the Mass was according to the true Catholic rite said in Latin, someone from China or Africa could go to Mass in England or America, and feel perfectly at home with the same old familiar Mass he was used to back home, which was the same Mass used throughout the world since the time of the Apostles. Similarly, when the bishops and Cardinals from around the world met in Rome, they all spoke Latin, which removed the language barrier between nationalities. The sacred must be separate from and above the profane (not in a haughty way, but in a manner becoming to the dignity thereof): “They shall teach My people the difference between holy and profane, and show them how to discern between clean and unclean.” (Ezechiel 44: 23). The use of Latin achieved this. This is also the reason for the use of archaic language in prayers said in English, and in English translations of Sacred Scripture. Archaic English preserves due reverence, and the sense, meaning and charm of Divine phraseology, which differs even grammatically from current usages, which may miss the subtle nuances and even important meanings of the Sacred Text. Somehow, “Our Father in Heaven, reverenced is your name.” in the “Our Father” or The Lords Prayer, doesn’t ring like “Our Father Who Art In Heaven, hallowed be Thy Name”. The former is less likely to be received well in Heaven, and who doesn’t want to be delivered from evil? Similarly, with the “Hail, Mary full of grace” (Luke 1: 28), prayer. Many translators either missed or ignored the meaning and importance of the word “grace”. Some translators have rendered it “favor”, others have thought it meant “charm”, when it really refers to the fact that the Blessed Virgin was full of sanctifying grace, meaning that she never had either original or actual sin: See: “Index Of Forbidden Books” above. God is perfect and man is not, therefore, Gods word should not be tampered with! There is a place for modernity, and a place where it doesn’t belong. The fashion of a corrupt and degenerate age is especially unsuitable for holy things, which those who are of Gods side would want to preserve, and which those who are of the Devil would want to destroy.

"God will send two punishments; one will be in the form of wars, revolutions and other evils; it shall originate on earth. The other will be sent from Heaven. There shall come over the whole Earth an intense darkness lasting three days and three nights. Nothing can be seen, and the air will be laden with pestilence which shall claim mainly, but not only, the enemies of religion. It will be impossible to use any man-made lighting during this darkness, except blessed candles. He who out of curiosity, opens his window to look out, or leaves his home, will fall dead on the spot. During the three days, people should remain in their homes, pray the Rosary and beg God for mercy... All enemies of the Church, whether known or unknown, will perish over the whole earth during that universal darkness, with the exception of a few whom God will convert. The air will be infected with demons who will appear under all sorts of hideous forms." (Blessed Ann-Marie Taigi, 19th century).

"There will come three days of complete darkness. Only blessed candles made of wax will give some light during this horrible darkness. One candle will last for three days, but they will not give light in the houses of the Godless. Lightning will penetrate your houses, but it will not put out the blessed candles. Neither wind, nor storm, nor earthquake will put out the blessed candles. Red clouds, like blood, will cross the sky, and the crash of thunder will shake the earth to its very core. The ocean will cast its foaming waves over the land, and the earth will be turned into a huge graveyard. The bodies of the wicked and the righteous will cover the face of the earth. The famine that follows will be severe. All plant life will be destroyed as well as three fourths of the human race. This crisis will be sudden and the punishment will be world-wide" (Marie de la Faudais, 19th century).

"The death of the impenitent persecutors of the Church will take place during the three days darkness. He who outlives that darkness and the fear of these three days will think that he is alone on earth because the whole world will be covered with carcasses" (Blessed Caspar Del Buffalo, 19th century).

In Sacred Scripture: "I will show wonders in heaven, and in earth, blood, fire, and vapor of smoke. The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood: before the great and dreadful day of the Lord doth come" (Joel 2: 30,31).

"And because iniquity hath abounded, the charity of many shall grow cold. But he that shall persevere unto the end, he shall be saved. And this Gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in the whole world, for a testimony to all nations, and then shall the consummation come. When therefore you shall see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of by the prophet Daniel, standing in the holy place: he that reads let him understand... And immediately after the tribulation of those days, the sun shall be darkened and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of Heaven shall be moved: and then shall appear the sign of the Son of Man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn: and they shall see the Son of Man coming in the clouds of Heaven with much power and majesty" (Matt. 24: 12-15, 29,30).   

"And a mighty angel took up a stone, as it were a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying: With such violence as this shall Babylon, that great city, be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all... And the woman that you saw, is the great city, which had kingdom over the kings of the earth... Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, mourning and famine, and she shall be burnt with fire; because God is strong who shall judge her... And the fifth angel poured out his vial upon the seat of the beast, and his kingdom became dark" (Apoc. 18: 21, 17: 18, 18: 8, 16: 10).

"If Babylon should mount up to heaven, and establish her strength on high: from me there should come spoilers upon her, saith the Lord... Because the Lord hath laid Babylon waste, and destroyed out of her the great voice ("A voice speaking great things" (Apoc. 13: 5). It could be describing the modern media. -ed) ...Behold, I come against thee, thou destroying mountain, said the Lord, which corrupted the whole earth" (Jer. 51: 53-55, 25).

Note: In the Apocalypse, St. John prophecies Babylon as a kingdom of the future which will be the enemy of the City of God, the Holy Apostolic Roman Catholic Church. When St. John wrote the Apocalypse the ancient Kingdom of Babylon had been destroyed and had disappeared hundreds of years before. The Fathers of the Church have always regarded Babylon as the figure of the “City of the Devil” says Pope Leo XIII in “On Freemasonry”, quoting St. Augustine’s famous work “The City of God”.

“… All the proud, and all that do wickedly shall be stubble: the day that comes shall set them on fire, saith the Lord of Hosts, it shall not leave them root, nor branch. But unto you that fear My name the Sun of justice shall arise, and health in His wings: and you shall go forth and shall leap like the calves of the herd. And you shall tread down the wicked when they shall be ashes under the sole of your feet in the day that I do this, saith the Lord of Hosts.” (Malchias 4: 1-3). Nothing like this has ever happened. Therefore, this prophecy remains to be fulfilled. Indeed, the empire of evil is so entrenched the world over, that the restoration of the reign of God would seem to require this, short of a mass and miraculous conversion, which is hardly likely given the wickedness of that genre, and the enormity of their crimes: “Thus saith the Lord: For three crimes of Israel, and for four I will not convert him: because he hath sold the just man for silver, and the poor man for a pair of shoes” (Amos 2: 6).
     ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1984:  "In Cardinal Ratzinger's declaration to Vittorio Messori... After stating that he had read the third secret, the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith answered the journalist, who asked why this secret was still not revealed: 'Because, according to the judgment of the Popes, it adds nothing to what a Christian must already know from Revelation: a radical call to conversion, the absolute gravity of history, dangers threatening the life and faith of the Christian, and therefore, the world. And also the importance of the "last times"... But the things contained in this third secret correspond to what is announced in Scripture, and are confirmed by many other Marian apparitions, beginning with the Fatima apparitions themselves in their known contents. Conversion and penance are essential conditions for salvation. To publish the third secret would mean exposing the Church to the danger of sensationalism, exploitation of the content'." (The Whole Truth About The Third Secret", p.771, pt. 3, ch.7, by Frere Michel De La Saint Trinite). From The Fatima Crusader Ph. 1-800-263-8160.

In 1996:  An Eastern Rite of the Catholic Church, in a 1997 newsletter of the Eparchy of New Westminster, Summer edition, carried the following story from "Challenge Magazine" 1996: "The much discussed 'third secret of Fatima' is not sensational or Apocalyptic, said Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger... to all the curious, I would say I am certain that the Virgin does not engage in sensationalism. She does not create fear, she does not present Apocalyptic visions, but guides people to her Son. That is what is essential... The Church is opposed to sensationalism and this expectation of unheard things. It would be a perversion to give in to such pressures by publishing 'the third secret' he said. 'Instead, the intention and centrality of the mission of the Church is to guide people towards those things that are truly important' he said".

"Catholicism has no more fear of a well sharpened stiletto than monarchies have, but these two bases of the social order can fall together by corruption. Let us then never cease to corrupt.. the blood of the Martyrs is the seed of Christians. Let us then not make martyrs, but let us popularize vice... let us cause them to draw it in by their five senses... Make vicious hearts and you will have no more Catholics. Keep the priest away from labor, from the altar, and from virtue... He will become ambitious, intriguing, and perverse. You will thus have accomplished your task better than if you blunted your stiletto on the bones of some poor wretches... It is corruption en masse we have undertaken; the corruption of the people by the clergy, and the corruption of the clergy by ourselves; the corruption which ought, one day enable us to put the Church in her tomb... In order to destroy Catholicism it is necessary to commence by suppressing woman... but since we cannot suppress woman, let us corrupt her with the Church" ("Letter Of Piccolo Tigre", "Alta Vendita", the Masonic blueprint plan for the destruction of the Church and Catholics, obtained by the Italian police in a raid on a Lodge in Rome and handed over to Pope Gregory XVI, and  published by the encouragement of Pius IX, by Cretineau-Joly. "Grand Orient Freemasonry Unmasked, The Hidden Power Behind Communism", Ch. 15, P. 103, by Msgr. Dhillon.).

  “One priest informed me that the Pope was surrounded by picked “specialists”, “experts”, “advisors” to such an extent that he was a little better than a prisoner in his own house. Another priest informed me of the eternal surveillance exercised over the Pope… they give him no freedom of action even in the privacy of his own chambers… Those who exercise this surveillance are all hand-picked members of a certain (Masonic –ed.) order”. (“Red Fog Over America” by William Guy Carr, Commander of The Royal Canadian Navy, 1955).

“I came not to destroy souls, but to save” (Luke 9: 56).

St. Cyprian was a magician before he was converted. He was a high priest of Satan and was approached to obtain a spell to make a good Christian sin. The young virgin in question placed herself under the protection of the Blessed Virgin, and all of Cyprians sorcery was of no avail. Cyprian spoke to the Devil reproaching him that he had no power where the God of the Christians was concerned, and so he left idolatry and became Christian. Not only that, but he was ordained a priest, made a bishop, he died a martyr, and is a Doctor of the Church.

 “God our Savior who will have all men to be saved, and to come to the knowledge of the truth”. (1 Tim. 2: 3,4).

The Roman Rite Mass did not originate with Pope Gregory The Great in the 6th century. Like the work of Pope Damasus in the 4th century who codified Sacred Scripture by the industry of St. Jerome, who merely gathered all the parchments together, translated them and put them in order, to produce The Bible, Pope Gregory merely formatted what was handed down from the Apostles as conveyed to them by Christ Himself through the rites of the Old Testament: "Jesus took bread, blessed and broke; and gave to His disciples and said: Take ye and eat. This is My body. And taking the chalice He gave thanks, and gave to them saying: Drink ye all of this. For this is My blood of the New Testament, which shall be shed for many unto the remission of sins" (Matt. 26: 26-28).  "Do this for a commemoration of Me" (Luke 22: 19), said Jesus instituting the new rites fulfilling the Old at the time of Passover which itself foreshadowed the sacrifice, redemption, and the liturgy of the New Testament, The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, "the continual sacrifice" (Dan. 11: 31) foretold by the prophet Daniel.

Learn the truth by what the Devil most hates: “In the entire practice of genuine Satanism, the principle is to do everything backwards. The crucifix is always there, but hung upside down. A black Mass consists of taking the Roman Mass and saying it backwards. By the way, Satanists parody the Roman Mass, not the Novus Ordo (the Vatican II Mass). They don’t believe the Novus Ordo is a real Mass.” (The Kingdom of Darkness, P. 17, by Fr, Malachi Martin, S.J.), from Triumph Communications. The Devil communicates with his followers and lets them know what he hates most, and what his wishes are. When you know what’s holy, you know what isn’t, and what is unholy.

 “All organs of the press are bound together by professional secrecy… for not one of them is ever permitted to practice literature unless his whole past has some disgraceful sore or other… These sores would immediately be revealed (if he stepped out of line –ed.) … So long as they remain the secret of a few, the prestige of the journalist attracts the majority of the country” (“Waters Flowing Eastwards”, Ch. 4, Protocol 12, P. 146, by L. Fry, From Omni/C.B.C. Books: 661-274-2240). Married to Russian aristocrat massacred by the Antichristian Communists, collaborator with Msgr. Jouin who was commended by 2 Popes. Quoted by Fr. Denis Fahey, C.S.Sp., in his highly esteemed and approved works. 

   Pope Paul IV, Bull “Cum ex Apostolatus Officio”, Feb. 15, 1559: “6. In addition, [by this Our Constitution, which is to remain valid in perpetuity, We enact, determine, decree and define:] that if ever at any time it shall appear that any Bishop, even if he be acting as an Archbishop, Patriarch or Primate; or any Cardinal of the aforesaid Roman Church, or, as has already been mentioned, any legate, or even the Roman Pontiff, prior to his promotion or his elevation as Cardinal or Roman Pontiff, has deviated from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy: (i) the promotion or elevation, even if it shall have been uncontested and by the unanimous assent of all the Cardinals, shall be null, void and worthless; (ii) it shall not be possible for it to acquire validity (nor for it to be said that it has thus acquired validity) through the acceptance of the office, of consecration, of subsequent authority, nor through possession of administration, nor through the putative enthronement of a Roman Pontiff, or Veneration, or obedience accorded to such by all, nor through the lapse of any period of time in the foregoing situation; (iii) it shall not be held as partially legitimate in any way…
   (vi) those thus promoted or elevated shall be deprived automatically, and without need for any further declaration, of all dignity, position, honour, title, authority, office and power… 7. Finally, [by this Our Constitution, which is to remain valid in perpetuity, We] also [enact, determine, define and decree]: that any and all persons who would have been subject to those thus promoted or elevated if they had not previously deviated from the Faith, become heretics, incurred schism or provoked or committed any or all of these, be they members of anysoever of the following categories: (i) the clergy, secular and religious; (ii) the laity; (iii) the Cardinals [etc.]… shall be permitted at any time to withdraw with impunity from obedience and devotion to those thus promoted or elevated and to avoid them as warlocks, heathens, publicans, and heresiarchs (the same subject persons, nevertheless, remaining bound by the duty of fidelity and obedience to any future Bishops, Archbishops, Patriarchs, Primates, Cardinals and Roman Pontiff canonically entering).

         “the peoples of the world do not deserve the name of men but of beasts”. “God created them in the form of men for the glory of Israel. But Akum were created for the sole end of ministering unto them day and night. Nor can they be relieved of this service. It is becoming to the son of a king (an Israelite) that animals in their natural form, and animals in the form of human beings should minister to them”. (Talmud (The religious code of the Synagogue), Babas Metzia, Fol. 114, & Midrasch Talpioth fol. 225d, from “The Talmud Unmasked”, Ch. 2, P. 50, by Fr. I.B. Pranitis. Imprimatur from the highest authorities of the Catholic Church in Russia, 1898.).   

See how this contradicts what God said:

“If a stranger dwell in your land and abide among you, do not upbraid him: But let him be among you as one of the same country: and you shall love him as yourselves: for you were strangers in the land of Egypt. I Am the Lord your God”. (Leviticus 19: 33).

“By the death of our Redeemer”, says Pope Pius XII in his encyclical “Mystici Corporis”, “the New Testament took the place of the Old Law which had been abolished; then the Law of Christ together with its mysteries, enactments, institutions, and sacred rites was ratified for the whole world in the blood of Jesus Christ... was there effected a transfer from the Law to the Gospel, from the Synagogue to the Church, from many sacrifices to one Victim, that, as Our Lord expired, that mystical veil which shut off the innermost part of the Temple and its sacred secret was rent violently from top to bottom. On the Cross then the Old Law died, soon to be buried and a bearer of death” (Ibid. 29,30).

“Whoever believes that Jesus is the Christ, is born of God. And everyone who loves Him who begot, loves Him also who is born of Him” (1 Jn. 5: 1).

The Ten Commandments:
1). I Am the Lord thy God, thou shalt not have strange Gods before Me.
2). Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain. 
3). Remember that thou shalt keep holy the Sabbath day. 
4). Honor thy father and thy mother. 
5). Thou shalt not kill.
6). Thou shalt not commit adultery.
7). Thou shalt not steal.
8). Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.
9). Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife (or husband).
10). Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s goods.

 “They suborned men to say, they heard him speak words of blasphemy against Moses and against God. And they stirred up the people, and the ancients, and the scribes, and running together, they took him, and brought him to the council… You stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, you always resist the Holy Ghost, as your fathers did, so do you also. Which of the prophets have not your fathers persecuted? And they have slain them who foretold the coming of the Just One; of Whom you have been now the betrayers and murderers; who have received the law by the disposition of angels, and have not kept it” (Acts 6:11 & 7: 51-53).

"With regard to ourselves, who have been neither condemned nor convicted... if they who have been so guilty would even now allege charges by reason of which they iniquitously cast us out, not telling us of the accusations, nor making charges against us, the accusers not appearing, let us have an impartial judge, and we will submit ourselves to his sentence and prove ourselves guiltless of what is brought against us, as indeed, we are. Their recent deeds are against all propriety and every law... neither the Scythians not the Sauromites have never given sentence for one party alone, in the absence of the accused, who was refusing, not judgement, but hatred, demanding a thousand judges, declaring himself innocent, ready to clear himself of charges in the face of the world, showing that he is blameless in everything". (St. John Chrysostom, Bishop of Constantinople: Letter to Innocent, Pope of Rome, 404 A.D., from "Leaves from St. John Chrysostom",Ch. Pt. III,. 280, 281, by Mary H. Allies. Imprimatur: Henry Edward, Cardinal Archbishop, Westmonastrii, Nov. 1888, Printed by Burns & Oates, London).

Pope Pius XI condemning Ecumenism, that is, interfaith gatherings, like the abomination of Assisi 1986: “The Apostolic See can by no means take part in these assemblies, nor is it in any way lawful for Catholics to give such enterprises their encouragement or support. If they did so, they would be giving countenance to false Christianity quite alien to the one Church of Christ. Shall we commit the iniquity of suffering the truth, the truth revealed by God, to be made a subject for compromise? For it is indeed a question of defending revealed truth” (Pope Pius XI, encyclical Mortalium Animos).

“Bear not the yoke with unbelievers. For what participation hath justice with injustice? Or what fellowship hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? Or what part hath the faithful with the unbeliever? And what agreement has the Temple of God with idols? For you are the Temple of the living God; as God saith: I will dwell in them, and walk among them; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. Wherefore, go out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing: And I will receive you; and I will be a Father to you; and you shall be My sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty” (2 Cor. 6: 14-18).

“He that believes in the Son has life everlasting; but he that believes not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abides on him” (Jn. 3: 36).

“Who is a liar, but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is Antichrist, who denies the Father and the Son. Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father. He that confesses the Son, hath the Father also”. (1 Jn. 2: 22,23).

By this is the Spirit of God known. Every spirit which confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh, is of God: And every spirit that dissolveth Jesus, is not of God: and this is Antichrist”. (1 Jn. 4: 2,3).

“Whosoever revolts and continues not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that continues in the doctrine, the same has both the Father and the Son” (2 Jn. 1: 9).

 ¨  “Armagedon”, That Is, The Hill Of Robbers:  Footnote to the Apocalypse 16: 16. “As Pope Leo I rightly referred to a certain bogus “ecumenical council” as the Robber Council, so likewise what now confronts us is nothing more or less than a Robber Church”. (The Robber Church, Pt. 1, by Patrick Henry Omlor).

“Adulterers, know you not that the friendship of this world is the enemy of God? Whosoever therefore will be a friend of this world, becomes an enemy of God.” (James 4: 4).

“Contend earnestly for the Faith once delivered to the saints. For certain men are secretly entered in, (who were written of long ago unto this judgment) ungodly men, turning the grace of our Lord God into riotousness, and denying the only sovereign Ruler, and our Lord Jesus Christ”. (Jude 1: 4).

“There is a ring of priests in the Archdiocese of Chicago which has been practicing Satanic pedophilia amongst themselves and killing any dissident member…” (Fr. Malachi Martin, S.J., “The Kingdom of Darkness”, Pt. 3: The Smoke of Satan, P. 66, order from: The Fatima Crusader 1-800-263-8160). 

“Because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privately to spy on our liberty, which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into servitude. To whom we yielded not by subjection, no not for an hour, that the truth of the Gospel might continue with you” (Gal. 2: 4,5).

“But though We, or an angel from Heaven, preach a Gospel to you besides that which We have preached to you, let him be anathema” (Galatians 1: 8). “Anathema” means cursed by God.

“Know you not that the unjust shall not possess the Kingdom of God? Do not err: neither fornicators, not idolaters, nor adulterers, nor the effeminate, nor liers with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor railers, nor extortioners shall possess the Kingdom of God. And such some of you were; but you are washed, but you are sanctified, but you are justified in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, and the Spirit of our God”. (1 Cor. 6: 9-11).

“Promising them liberty, whereas they themselves are the slaves of corruption. For by whom a man is overcome, of the same also he is the slave. For if, flying from the pollutions of the world, through the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they be again entangled in them and overcome: their latter state is become unto them worse than the former. For it had been better for them not to have known the way of justice, than after having known it, to turn back from that holy commandment which was delivered to them” (2 Peter 2: 19-21).

“He that commits sin is of the Devil… Whoever is born of God commits not sin… In this the children of God are manifest and the children of the Devil” (1 Jn. 3: 9, 10).

“What does it profit a man, if he gains the whole world, and suffers the loss of his own soul?” (Matt.16: 26 ) – Time flies and everyone dies!

“The earth is the Lords and the fullness thereof: the world, and all they that dwell therein” (Psalm 23: 1).

“Provide out of all the people able men, such as fear God, in whom there is truth, and who hate avarice, and appoint them rulers” (Ex. 18: 21).
                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
“Behold, I Am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world” (Matt. 28: 20).

“Know you not what Scripture said of Elias when he called on God against Israel? ‘Lord, they have slain Thy prophets, they have dug down Thy altars; and I am left alone, and they seek my life’. But what saith the Divine answer to him? ‘I have left Me 7,000 men that have not bowed their knees to Baal’. Even so, then at this present time also, there is a remnant saved according to the election of grace… but the election hath obtained it; and the rest have been blinded” (Rom. 11: 2-7).

“He will raise up the innocent man against the hypocrite, and the just man will hold on his way, and he that has clean hands will be stronger and stronger” (Job. 17: 8,9).   

“Neither is there salvation in any other. For there is no other Name under Heaven given to men, whereby we must be saved” (Acts 4: 12).
                                                                                                                                                                                                       
“If even the priests of the Old Law had to abstain from the use of Marriage during their service in the Temple, for fear of being declared impure by the Law just as other men, is it not much more fitting that the ministers of Jesus Christ, who offer every day the Eucharistic Sacrifice, possess perfect chastity… our Redeemer so loved the flower of unimpaired modesty that not only was He born from a virginal womb, but was even cared for by a virgin nurse… (virginity being) the image of God corresponding to the sanctity of the Lord” (Pope Pius XII encyclical “Holy Virginity”).

* The Society of St. Pius X: Their critics are driven by a heretical notion of obedience and a profound ignorance of the nature of Eccliastical authority and discipline. Archbishop Lefebvre quite rightly saw the need to save the Catholic priesthood, and therefore, valid sacraments from extinction, which the changes to the rite of ordination were designed to effect by the enemies of Jesus Christ, the political agents of the New World Order, who took control of the Church by infiltrating the priesthood and rising up the ranks.
* Sede Vacantists: Are so-called because they, based on the principles expounded by Pope Pius XII in "Mystici Corporis", and in many other places throughout the history of the Church, conclude that the Popes, Bishops and Vatican II teaching what the Church has previously condemned by its infallible authority, and what contradicts the Bible, the word of God, are therefore heretical, and since heresy severs from the Church (as shown above), heretical ministers are not members of the Church and their offices or See's are or became vacant thereby, hence, the name: "sede vacantists" which means "vacant seat". Like Archbishop Lefebvre, the bishops and priests of this class picked up the slack and did what needed to be done to get the Church back on its feet after this massive assault at Vatican II, or rather, a crucifixion of the Mystical Body.

Prayer to St. Michael from Exorcism (Approved 18 May 1890.)                    
NOTE: In 1902 the Congregation of Rites issued a decree approving a new version of the prayer. The passages indicated in bold face below were removed.

O GLORIOUS ARCHANGEL St Michael, Prince of the heavenly host, defend us in battle, and in the struggle which is ours against the principalities and Powers, against the rulers of this world of darkness, against spirits of evil in high places. (Eph 6.) Come to the aid of men, whom God created immortal, made in his own image and likeness, and redeemed at a great price from the tyranny of the devil, (Wis 2, 1 Cor 6.)
Fight this day the battle of the Lord, together with the holy angels, as already thou hast fought the leader of the proud angels, Lucifer, and his apostate host, who were powerless to resist thee, nor was there place for them any longer in Heaven, But that cruel, that ancient serpent, who is called the devil or Satan, who seduces the whole world, was cast into the abyss with all his angels, (Apoc 12.)
Behold, this primeval enemy and slayer of man has taken courage, Transformed into an angel of light, he wanders about with all the multitude of wicked spirits, invading the earth in order to blot out the name of God and of his Christ, to seize upon, slay and cast into eternal perdition souls destined for the crown of eternal glory. This wicked dragon pours out, as a most impure flood, the venom of his malice on men of depraved mind and corrupt heart, the spirit of lying, of impiety, of blasphemy, and the pestilent breath of impurity, and of every vice and iniquity.
These most crafty enemies have filled and inebriated with gall and bitterness the Church, the spouse of the Immaculate Lamb, and have laid impious hands on her most sacred possessions.
In the Holy Place itself, where has been set up the See of the most holy Peter and the Chair of Truth for the light of the world, they have raised the throne of their abominable impiety, with the iniquitous design that when the Pastor has been struck, the sheep may be scattered.
Arise then, O invincible prince, bring help against the attacks of the lost spirits to the people of God, and bring them the victory.

The Church venerates thee as protector and patron; in thee holy Church glories as her defence against the malicious powers of this world and of hell; to thee has God entrusted the souls of men to be established in heavenly beatitude.
Oh, pray to the God of peace that He may put Satan under our feet, so far conquered that he may no longer be able to hold men in captivity and harm the Church. Offer our prayers in the sight of the Most High, so that they may quickly conciliate the mercies of the Lord; and beating down the dragon, the ancient serpent, who is the devil and Satan, do thou again make him captive in the abyss, that he may no longer seduce the nations.

From: TraditionalMass.Org. & MostHoly FamilyMonastery.Com.
                                                      ---------------------------------------------------------------
It would be a grave error, on the other hand, to say that Christ has no authority whatever in civil affairs, since, by virtue of the absolute empire over all creatures committed to Him by the Father, all things are in His power… If the Kingdom of Christ, then, receives, as it should, all nations under its sway, there seems to be no reason why we should despair of seeing that peace which the King of Peace came to bring on earth – He who came to reconcile all things, who came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, Who, though Lord of all, gave Himself to us as a model of humility, and with His principal law united the precept of charity, Who said also: ‘My yoke is sweet and My burden light’. Oh, what happiness would be ours if all men, individuals, families, nations, would but let themselves be governed by Christ!” (Pope Pius XI in “On the Kingship of Christ”: Quas Primas).

Why Was “Religious Liberty” Condemned By The Church: “All the gods of the gentiles are Devils” (Psalm 95: 5), and “The things the heathens sacrifice, they sacrifice to Devils and not to God” (1 Cor. 10: 20). The Religious Liberty of Vatican II was condemned by several Popes, most notably by Pope Pius IX in “Quanta Cura”, by the Fathers of the Church as well as by Sacred Scripture. It is not about liberty for Catholics to be Catholics, since persecuting secular authorities don’t care what the Church says. Only Catholics heed what the Church says. It is about putting the true religion on the same level with false religions, and allowing false religions to proselytize in Catholic nations. This was also condemned by Pope Leo XIII in “On Human Liberty”. See page 34. “Justice therefore forbids, and reason itself forbids, the State to be godless; or to adopt a line of action that would end in godlessness – namely, to treat the various religions, as they call them, alike, and to bestow upon them promiscuously equal rights and privileges …  that religion must be professed which alone is true, and which can be recognized without difficulty, especially in Catholic States, because the marks of truth are, as it were, engraved upon it” (Pope Leo XIII in “Human Liberty”, in “A Light In The Heavens”.
“These are the precepts and judgments, that you must do in the land, which the Lord the God of thy Fathers will give thee, to possess it all the days that thou shalt walk upon the earth. Destroy all places in which the nations, that you shall possess, worshipped their gods upon high mountains… Overthrow their altars, and break down their statues, burn their groves with fire, and break their idols in pieces: destroy their names out of those places. You shall not do so the Lord your God… If there arise in the midst of thee a prophet or one that saith he dreamed a dream, and he foretell a sign and a wonder. And that come to pass which he spoke, and he say to thee: Let us go and follow strange gods, which thou knowest not, and let us serve them. Thou shalt not hear the words of the prophet or dreamer: for the Lord your God trieth you, that it may appear whether you love Him with all your heart of not. Follow the Lord your God, and fear Him, and keep His Commandments… And that prophet or forger of dreams shall be slain: because he spoke to draw you away from the Lord your God” (Deut. 12: 1-4 & 13: 1-5). So much for Ecumenism and Religious Liberty with God! However, one must look at history to see how the Church applied this teaching of Holy Scripture. They did not send in missionaries with guns blazing. Whether they used only friendly persuasion as St. Francis Xavier did in China in the 1600s, or smashed idols and overturned altars as St. Martin of Tours did in the 4th century in France, it was only to commence to teach people who were willing to hear.
In the spirit of Ecumenism and Religious Liberty, the Vatican II Antipopes ordered Catholic nations, such as Italy and Colombia to remove the designation of State religion for the Catholic faith from their national Constitutions. Those were acts of formal apostasy. What else is to be expected of Freemasons wearing miter and cope? In opposition to them, the following is what true Popes say on the matter: “If we ordain that the whole Catholic world shall revere Christ as King, We shall minister to the need of the present day, and at the same time provide an excellent remedy for the plague which now infects society. We refer to the plague of secularism, its errors and impious activities. This evil spirit, as you are well aware, venerable brethren, has not come into being in one day… the feast of the Kingship of Christ will draw attention to the evils which secularism has brought upon society, in drawing men away from Christ, and will also do much to remedy them. While nations insult the beloved Name of our Redeemer by suppressing all mention of it in their conferences and parliaments, we must all the more loudly proclaim His kingly dignity and power, all the more universally affirm His rights… not only private individuals but also rulers and princes are bound to give public honor and obedience to Christ. It will call to their minds the thought of the last judgment, wherein Christ, Who has been cast out of public life, despised, neglected, and ignored, will most severely avenge these insults; for His Kingly dignity demands that the State should take account of the Commandments of God and of Christian principles, both in making laws and in administering justice, and also in providing for the young a sound moral education.” (Pope Pius XI, encyclical “On The Kingship of Christ”, Quas Primas). Nowhere is it more evident than in the present, that if the Kingdom of God does not reign over the world, the Kingdom of Satan will! God “makes a man that is a hypocrite to reign for the sins of the people” (Job 34: 30).

“It is to the Catholic Church that we must ascribe the merit of having propagated and defended Christian philosophy, without which the world would still be buried in the darkness of pagan superstitions and in the most abject barbarism. It has preserved and transmitted to all generations the precious treasure of literature and of the ancient sciences. It opened the first schools for the people and crowded the universities, which still exist… It has inspired the loftiest, the purest, and the most glorious literature, while it has gathered under its protection men whose genius in the arts has never been eclipsed”. (Pope Leo XIII in “Review Of His Pontificate” from “A Light In The Heavens”).




Posted by at 1 comment:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)